similar to: [LLVMdev] Can not compile using llvm-gfortran

Hi, I have installed llvm and llvm-gfortran on Pentium4 machine using 32-bit Ubuntu, it works fine. I recently installed them on AMD64-Ubuntu 8.04, llvm-gfortran gave me following errors $ llvm-gfortran -Wall hello.f95 -o hellof /home/jli127/LLVM/llvm-gcc/install/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.2.1/../../../../lib64/libgfortran.a(error.o): In function `_gfortrani_gfc_itoa':

Hi, > I have installed llvm and llvm-gfortran on Pentium4 machine using 32-bit > Ubuntu, it works fine. I recently installed them on AMD64-Ubuntu 8.04, > llvm-gfortran gave me following errors > > $ llvm-gfortran -Wall hello.f95 -o hellof this works here on x86-64 ubuntu 8.10. I took a look in my libgfortran.a and it doesn't reference any of the symbols you mention. >

Hi Duncan, Thanks for your answers. Compiling .s file is OK after adding the -lgfortran -lgfortranbegin. I replace my Ubuntu 8.04 and by Ubuntu 8.10. And I checked all new packages installed by 'apt-get' are amd64 version. However after compiling the llvm-gfortran, I got the same error. Here is my configure arguments $ ../llvm-gcc4.2-2.3.source/configure --prefix=`pwd`/../install

Hello, we re-distribute R with our open-source platform http://www.ok-sat-library.org/ where we use R mainly for evaluation of computational experiments. Due to the various platforms, we build everything from source, and that works fine. Until now, that is: there are circumstances (for example in computer-science computer labs) where no Fortran-compiler is provided, and the users (students)

Hello folks, I want to compile some fortran code to IR, but llvm-gfortran 4.2-2.9 does compile my fortran code. gfortran 4.2.1 fail with the same error. but gfortran 4.4.6 and ifort compiles fine. Attached is the file causing error. Error message is m_List.F90: In function 'exporttostring_': m_List.F90:925: error: conversion to non-scalar type requested I wonder if there any way I can

Hi, in trying to build an llvm-gfortran on linux from today's gcc4 SVN, I get the following link errors that didn't show up on OS X. This is also using LLVM CVS from this morning. They appear to mostly be related to CodeWarrior compatibility code, but a couple are less obvious. What's the best way to fix this? I'm stuck without my powerbook for at least three weeks and I'd

On 9/9/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Steven Bosscher wrote: > > You wrote: > >> The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with gfortran at > >> all, > > Actually, the entire suite compiles flawlessly with gfortran. > > See http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranResults > > Was that true of GCC 4.0.1?

We're finding that several of the packages we need don't compile using the version 4.1.2 of gfortran that comes with CentOS 5.4. So, I've built the latest version of gfortran (e.g. 4.4.2) but I've done it so that all the new version's files go in /share/apps/gnu so that they don't interfere with the standard gcc distribution (building gfortran requires building some parts

You wrote: > The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with gfortran at > all, Actually, the entire suite compiles flawlessly with gfortran. See http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranResults Gr. Steven

On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Yuanfang Chen <tabloid.adroit at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello folks, > I want to compile some fortran code to IR, but llvm-gfortran 4.2-2.9 does > compile my fortran code. gfortran 4.2.1 fail with the same error. but > gfortran 4.4.6 and ifort compiles fine. Attached is the file causing > error. Error message is > m_List.F90: In function

Hello, gfortran-4.4 is not in the synaptic package manager. Effort to search for it on the web is not fruitful. I tried to install gcc-4.4 in place of it. That does not solve my problem either. Another machine that has gfortran-4.4 runs my code without error. Attempt to run the same code with gcc-4.4 failed. I equally tried running the same code with gfortran-4.3 but that resulted in error. Any

On 9/9/06, Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc at gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/9/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Steven Bosscher wrote: > > > You wrote: > > >> The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with gfortran at > > >> all, > > > Actually, the entire suite compiles flawlessly with

Hi, in a thread this afternoon about compiling the Fortran SPEC2000 to LLVM bytecode, Chris mentioned that it should be possible to compile to LLVM with the gfortran front end, although no one has necessarily tried it. I was surprised (and happy) to hear this, as under the impression that it would require a "complete rewrite of the gfortran backend" [1]. Now, I probably misinterpreted

On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Michael McCracken wrote: > Hi, in a thread this afternoon about compiling the Fortran SPEC2000 to > LLVM bytecode, Chris mentioned that it should be possible to compile > to LLVM with the gfortran front end, although no one has necessarily > tried it. Yup. > I was surprised (and happy) to hear this, as under the impression that > it would require a

On 9/9/06, Michael McCracken <michael.mccracken at gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/9/06, Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 9/9/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > > On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Steven Bosscher wrote: > > > > You wrote: > > > >> The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with

Hi, I replaced my Rtools today as posted at http://www.murdoch-sutherland.com/Rtools/Rtools.exe Trying to build R-devel_2007-12-13.tar.gz without modifying MkRules gives the gfortran command not found error below. I am wondering if gfortran.exe is missing from (recent?) Rtools.exe or I am doing something wrong. Thanks to hints at Duncan's site, I worked around the error by adding

On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 05:38:30PM -0700, Bill Wendling wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.msbb.uc.edu> wrote: > > Chris and Bill, > > I have tested the proposed patch from... > > > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2008-August/016490.html > > > > under i686-apple-darwin9 and it solves the problems

Hi Ashay, Do you need specifically llvm-gfortran that is based on gcc 4.2? Since that, DragonEgg has been introduced - a powerful plugin to gcc that makes it possible to utilize regular gcc compilers as frontends to llvm: http://dragonegg.llvm.org/ It generates Fortran90 programs for me very well. - D. 2011/9/1 Ashay Rane <ashay.rane at tacc.utexas.edu>: > Hello, > I have been

Does anyone know if the issue with building the gfortran front-end on Darwin will be addressed for llvm 2.4? The last time a checked a few weeks back, llvm-gcc-4.2 svn was still producing the linkage error... > Undefined symbols: > "_create_init_utf16_var", referenced from: > _darwin_build_constant_cfstring in libbackend.a(darwin.o) I believe the analysis of this was

Hi all, I am having a look at llvm-gfortran; it compiles OK, but I do not know how to using the JIT as described in http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#tutorial. With llvm-gcc I managed to invoke the lli properly, but with llvm-gfortran compiled programs, it fails with the following message: philou at tleilax:~/gcc/llvm/install/bin$ lli ./main.bc 'main' function not found in