Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] New clang builder"
2011 Sep 07
5
[LLVMdev] Llvm build master status?
Hello Daniel,
osuosl build master (google1) is moved to another place or just down?
Thanks
Galina
2011 Jul 08
3
[LLVMdev] LLVM on ARM testing.
On 07/ 4/11 01:39 AM, Eli Friedman wrote:
> For the JIT failures, it would be nice if you could track down the SVN
> revision when it started failing. (We have an ARM buildbot at
> http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/clang-native-arm-cortex-a9 ,
> but the JIT was already broken when it was set up.)
I've used my i.MX53 board to get this, but I'm returning it today back
to
2011 Sep 07
0
[LLVMdev] Llvm build master status?
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 17:08, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Daniel,
>
> osuosl build master (google1) is moved to another place or just down?
>From IRC:
[12:07pm] DannyB_: hi folks
[12:07pm] DannyB_: for security reasons, google1 and google2 (google1
is the main llvm build master)
[12:07pm] DannyB_: will be down for a few weeks
[12:08pm] DannyB_:
2011 Jul 08
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM on ARM testing.
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Karel Gardas <karel.gardas at centrum.cz> wrote:
> On 07/ 4/11 01:39 AM, Eli Friedman wrote:
>>
>> For the JIT failures, it would be nice if you could track down the SVN
>> revision when it started failing. (We have an ARM buildbot at
>> http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/clang-native-arm-cortex-a9 ,
>> but the JIT was
2011 Sep 14
0
[LLVMdev] Llvm build master status?
Hello everyone,
May be google1 build master cold be moved to lab.llvm.org machines?
Do anybody use it?
Thanks
Galina
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 6:40 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
>> I am working on it, but it may not happen until this weekend
>
> thanks a lot for working on this.
>
> Best wishes, Duncan.
>
>>
>> On Wed,
2011 Sep 07
3
[LLVMdev] Llvm build master status?
Hi Daniel,
> I am working on it, but it may not happen until this weekend
thanks a lot for working on this.
Best wishes, Duncan.
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:41 AM, Duncan Sands<baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>>> [12:07pm] DannyB_: for security reasons, google1 and google2 (google1
>>> is the main llvm build master)
>>>
2011 Jun 15
2
[LLVMdev] Inconsistency between LLVM Jit and pandaboard
Hi all,
I'm one of the developers of the Jade project, a Jit decoder running with
LLVM 2.9. We are currently testing our decoder on a
pandaboard<http://pandaboard.org/> based
on an OMAP 4430 and the Jit compilation seems to crash once there is a call
to a function in the LLVM IR. We have already tested this issue with lli in
its 2.9 version, and this bug still stays the same. LLVM
2011 Sep 14
1
[LLVMdev] Llvm build master status?
google5 is up, i'm just working on copying the buildmaster config.
If you want to move it to lab.llvm, that's fine too.
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> May be google1 build master cold be moved to lab.llvm.org machines?
> Do anybody use it?
>
> Thanks
>
> Galina
>
>
>
> On
2011 Oct 10
4
[LLVMdev] New buildmaster is up and running
Hello everyone,
LLVM buildmaster is up and running as lab.llvm.org:8011.
Daniel Berlin is working on getting the current buildslave passwords
from the old buildmaster, but this may not be possible.
I'd suggest changing buildslave passwords anyway, just in case.
Buildslave owners, please contact me directly with your new passwords
and I'll update the master as soon as I can.
Thanks
2011 Oct 08
1
[LLVMdev] Llvm build master status?
Hi Danny,
Could you send me the local.cfg from the original buildmaster with the
buildslave names and passwords, please?
Thanks
Galina
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Daniel Berlin <dannyb at google.com> wrote:
> Sure, i'm fine with it :)
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> wrote:
>> Danny,
>>
>> lab.llvm.org
2011 Jul 03
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM on ARM testing.
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Karel Gardas <karel.gardas at centrum.cz> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I asked here for kind of reference GCC version which LLVM development
> team is using for *native* testing on ARM hardware. (no cross
> compilation!) last week or so. I've been curious myself how the
> situation looks and so I tested LLVM 2.9 as a reference point and LLVM
>
2011 Oct 07
3
[LLVMdev] Llvm build master status?
Hi,
it seems the LLVM buildmaster is until today not up again. Especially
for the upcoming release I think it is very necessary to have it running
again.
@Daniel Berlin: Any progress on the Google machines? Can you give an update?
In case the Google machines still take a while, I would like to follow
Galina's proposal. I would volunteer to set up a buildbot on the
lab.llvm.org machines.
2011 Oct 07
3
[LLVMdev] Llvm build master status?
Danny,
lab.llvm.org has offered to host the buildbot master and therefore would relieve you of your duty to keep updating it. Are you ok with this?
Thanks,
Tanya
On Oct 7, 2011, at 7:19 AM, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> The machine exists, it is running, i have not had time to put buildbot
> back on it and download the llvm config.
> If you want to set up the buildbot config on it, i'm
2011 Oct 07
0
[LLVMdev] Llvm build master status?
The machine exists, it is running, i have not had time to put buildbot
back on it and download the llvm config.
If you want to set up the buildbot config on it, i'm happy to give you access.
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 6:15 AM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it seems the LLVM buildmaster is until today not up again. Especially for
> the upcoming release I
2011 Oct 08
0
[LLVMdev] Llvm build master status?
Sure, i'm fine with it :)
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> wrote:
> Danny,
>
> lab.llvm.org has offered to host the buildbot master and therefore would relieve you of your duty to keep updating it. Are you ok with this?
>
> Thanks,
> Tanya
>
> On Oct 7, 2011, at 7:19 AM, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
>> The machine exists,
2009 Aug 07
3
[LLVMdev] FW: buildbot failure in llvm on llvm-i686-linux
These URLs don't work for me. How do I know what is broken?
It builds fine on my x86 linux box.
-----Original Message-----
From: buildbot at google1.osuosl.org [mailto:buildbot at google1.osuosl.org]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 5:12 PM
To: Sanjiv Kumar Gupta - I00171
Cc: llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: buildbot failure in llvm on llvm-i686-linux
The Buildbot has detected a new
2009 Aug 07
0
[LLVMdev] FW: buildbot failure in llvm on llvm-i686-linux
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 9:18 AM, <Sanjiv.Gupta at microchip.com> wrote:
> These URLs don't work for me. How do I know what is broken?
> It builds fine on my x86 linux box.
Why don't the URLs work for you?
In this case the problem was just because llvm.org went down. When an
"svn" step fails; i.e., the line after "BUILD FAILED:", the problem is
usually
2010 Feb 12
1
[LLVMdev] Unable to connect to google1.osuosl.org
I am unable to connect to build master at:google1.osuosl.org:9990 from my buildslave.
See attached twisted9.0.0 log.
2010-02-12 09:50:03-0800 [-] Log opened.
2010-02-12 09:50:03-0800 [-] twistd 9.0.0 (C:\Python26\python.exe 2.6.2) starting up.
2010-02-12 09:50:03-0800 [-] reactor class: twisted.internet.win32eventreactor.Win32Reactor.
2010-02-12 09:50:03-0800 [-] Starting factory
2009 Aug 07
1
[LLVMdev] FW: buildbot failure in llvm on llvm-i686-linux
On Aug 7, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Daniel Dunbar wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 9:18 AM, <Sanjiv.Gupta at microchip.com> wrote:
>> These URLs don't work for me. How do I know what is broken?
>> It builds fine on my x86 linux box.
>
> Why don't the URLs work for you?
>
I suspect the corporate firewall is blocking outgoing connections on
port 8011.
-jim
> In
2011 Oct 10
0
[LLVMdev] New buildmaster is up and running
Hi Galina,
> LLVM buildmaster is up and running as lab.llvm.org:8011.
...
> Buildslave owners, please contact me directly with your new passwords
> and I'll update the master as soon as I can.
should build slaves now use the osuosl configuration? For example
osuosl/Config.py has
def getBuildmasterHost():
return 'google1.osuosl.org'
which is surely wrong now. On