similar to: [LLVMdev] clarification question

Hi All, I am trying to check if a Value type is a int32 pointer by using if(T == Type::getInt1PtrTy(Context, AS)) ... I am trying to understand the AS (address space). How do I get it? Thanks. George * * -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110606/775e4f09/attachment.html>

On 6 June 2011 17:08, George Baah <georgebaah at gmail.com> wrote: > if(T == Type::getInt1PtrTy(Context, AS)) ... Hi, You don't need to care about address spaces to check for an int32*: if (T->isPointerTy()) { const Type* intT = cast<PointerType>(T)->getElementType(); if (intT->isIntegerTy() && intT->getPrimitiveSizeInBits() == 32) cout <<

Oh I see what you mean but I don't think that is the value that I want. In the code, I know that %N = load i32* %k, align 4 %p = getelementptr inbounds [10 x [20 x i32]]* %3, i32 0, i32 %M, i32 %N So I analyze the GEP and know that %N is a pointer to an int32, which is the array index. I want to get that index so I can insert a check to see if it violates the array bounds. So the final code

That's because instructions have a location associated with them, not a compile unit. -eric On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 12:46 PM, George Baah <georgebaah at gmail.com> wrote: > I used DILocation instead of DICompileUnit and it works. Hmmm, interesting. > > George > > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:33 AM, George Baah <georgebaah at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Here is

Hmmm, but it has a getDirectory function. -G On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > That's because instructions have a location associated with them, not > a compile unit. > > -eric > > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 12:46 PM, George Baah <georgebaah at gmail.com> wrote: > > I used DILocation instead of DICompileUnit and

Here is the code. I am running on llvm 3.1 on Lion (Mac 10.7.4) *string getFileDirectory*(*const* Instruction &I){ MDNode *MD = I.getMetadata("dbg"); DICompileUnit compileUnit(MD); return compileUnit.getDirectory().str(); } George On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com>wrote: > Without knowing the code that you've written

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:48 PM, George Baah <georgebaah at gmail.com> wrote: > Oh I see what you mean but I don't think that is the value that I want. > In the code, I know that > %N = load i32* %k, align 4 > %p = getelementptr inbounds [10 x [20 x i32]]* %3, i32 0, i32 %M, i32 %N > So I analyze the GEP and know that %N is a pointer to an int32, which is the > array

We do not promise API stability for non-C languages; this is an API break as follows: instead of calling 'NBDKit.register_plugin model plugin' with a static model, you can now add .thread_model :(unit -> thread_model) to plugin or default to PARALLEL. Since all existing OCaml plugins will have already thought about thread models, they can convert their existing model into the new

You should probably think of the DIFooBar constructors like reinterpret-casts, not "go find the thing I actually want" functions. If you hand DICompileUnit() a node that is not a compile-unit metadata node, it's not going to tell you that you goofed. If you _did_ have a CU metadata node, then DICompileUnit's getDirectory() would work just fine. But you don't. --paulr

I used DILocation instead of DICompileUnit and it works. Hmmm, interesting. George On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:33 AM, George Baah <georgebaah at gmail.com> wrote: > Here is the code. I am running on llvm 3.1 on Lion (Mac 10.7.4) > > *string getFileDirectory*(*const* Instruction &I){ > > MDNode *MD = I.getMetadata("dbg"); > > DICompileUnit

I'm building tool-chain for processor without integer MUL. So, I've defined __mulsi3 for integer multiplication (int32). Now I've got a problem with int64 multiplication which is implemented in libgcc2.c. Segfualt due to infinite recursion in i64 soft multiplication (libgcc2, __muldi3). LLVM-GCC (for my target) misoptimizes code if -O2 is passed. It promotes i32 multiplication to

Yeah, It looks like I am doing exactly what's in Dwarf*.cpp files, yet I am getting blanks. George On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:00 AM, George Baah <georgebaah at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > How does one get the directory of the compilation unit in llvm? > > I am using

I mean an llvm Pass that transforms switch statements into if statements. For example, if I have code with switch statements then running the pass will convert all switches to ifs in the bytecode. George On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "George Baah" <georgebaah at gmail.com> > >

Hi Arushi, > I got this from C code compiled by llvm-gcc. > > There is a consistent prototype for the function > > TypHandle Cyclotomic ( hdRes, n, m ) > TypHandle hdRes; > long n, m; > > the call looks as follows, > hdI = ProdCyc( hdI, Cyclotomic( HdResult, n, 1 ) ); I bet the call occurs before the function is defined.

On 10/3/20 1:50 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > --- > plugins/ocaml/NBDKit.mli | 7 +++++++ > plugins/ocaml/NBDKit.ml | 4 ++++ > plugins/ocaml/bindings.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/plugins/ocaml/NBDKit.mli b/plugins/ocaml/NBDKit.mli > index ececd5fd..8abfeb49 100644 > --- a/plugins/ocaml/NBDKit.mli > +++

Hi Folks, Is a java frontend still being developed for llvm? George -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120726/95b28fc7/attachment.html>

Hi Guys, I am using the Postdom pass and I would like to get the root of the tree. However, everytime I try to get the root, I get a segfault. I don't know why the environment can't find DominatorTreeBase. Below is the code that generates the Segfault. In my .h file I include Dominators.h PDT.getRootNode(); //PDT is a reference to a PostDominatorTree dyld: lazy symbol binding

Without knowing the code that you've written and the IR that you're running on I'm not sure what I can do to help you. -eric On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:32 AM, George Baah <georgebaah at gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, It looks like I am doing exactly what's in Dwarf*.cpp files, yet I am > getting blanks. > > George > > On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Eric

There is also the LowerSwitch pass that converts switch instructions to a sequence of branches. On May 6, 2013, at 1:24 PM, George Baah <georgebaah at gmail.com> wrote: > I mean an llvm Pass that transforms switch statements into if statements. For example, if I have code with switch statements then running the pass will convert all switches to ifs in the bytecode. > > George

Thank you very much guys, I really appreciate your help. George On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Frits van Bommel <fvbommel at gmail.com>wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:57 PM, George Baah <georgebaah at gmail.com> wrote: > > I did M.getOrInsertFunction and called the exit function with . > > > > IRBuilder<> builder = IRBuilder<>(...); > >