similar to: [LLVMdev] Fail when building llvm2.9 using MinGW64

Chen, see http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#pf_12 ...Takumi ps. Excuse me, PE+ (aka pep) means "Executable file format for WIndows x64". 2011/5/16 陈晓宇 <xychen0921 at gmail.com>: > The stack trace: > > Starting program: > C:\MinGW\msys\1.0\home\xchen\llvm-obj\lib\Target\CellSPU/../.. > /../Debug/bin/tblgen.exe -I

Chen, 2011/5/13 陈晓宇 <xychen0921 at gmail.com>: > ../llvm2.9/configure --prefix=/home/AutoESL/llvm-obj >                             --host=x86_64-w64-mingw32 >                             --disable-multilib Please try with "--build=x86_64-w64-mingw32", not "--host". If you would still have any troubles, make sure your x86_64-w64-g++.exe can generate correct

AutoESL is a high-tech startup company providing innovative platform-based communication-centric SystemC/C-to-RTL synthesis technologies (see more in the "About Us" section). Currently AutoESL has several engineering positions open in its headquarter in Los Angeles, California and its R&D center in Beijing, China. Please e-mail your resume to recruiting at autoesl.com for immediate

AutoESL (www.autoesl.com) is the leading provider of high-level synthesis for FPGAs and ASICs. The company was founded in 2006 based on advanced technology that was nurtured, developed, and exclusively licensed from UCLA. AutoESL has now deployed this solution at many leading edge system and semiconductor companies. (see more in the "About Us" section). Currently AutoESL has several

I had llvm 2.9 installed on ununtu. I tried to build clang but got following error. I have llvm 2.9 and clang is latest version ( I don't know, I got from svn). I am wondering is it because of version problem ? Does clang work with 2.9 llvm ? llvm[3]: Compiling ClangASTNodesEmitter.cpp for Debug build In file included from

Hi all I had build llvm 2.8 on my Linux system, when i run "opt -version " command , it shows llvm2.8. I want replace llvm 2.8 with 2.9, i used "rpm -qa llvm" and "make unistall" and  "make clean" and then build llvm 2.9 but when run "opt -version" i get llvm 2.8 yet. and when want use "opt" i get error. how can i replace llvm 2.8 with

Hello I am new to LLVM and would like to cross-compile LLVM 2.9 on x86 (Ubuntu) to ARM using Code Sourcery LIte toolchain for ARM EABI (2011.03-41). This is the command I used to configure: ./configure --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu --host=arm-none-linux-gnueabi --target=arm-none-linux-gnueabi followed by: make -C llvm.2.9 ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=0 I encountered the following errors: configure:error:

Hi Devang, You recently mentioned that the pass manager now allows a ModulePass to require a FunctionPass. I just tried it but ran into errors. Could you please take a look to see if I did anything wrong? Thanks! Basically I changed the HelloWorld sample pass to be a ModulePass and tried to use the LoopInfo pass inside the runOnModule routine. See below for the source code and error messages.

Hi Rich, Does that means that all the functions provided by virt-resize will be migrated to virt-builder? Does the command virt-resize will totally be abandoned? We may need to modify all the virt-resize test cases if so. -- Thanks & Best regards, Chen Xiang Hua Raycom office Beijing (NAY), Red Hat Inc. Red Hat Telephony: 86 10 62608040 internal extension: 8388040 Team: Virt QE IRC:

With reference to the previous query, I think, i miscalculated the offset, just recalculating. 1. without instruction combining coupling member variable, is at:   %struct._FRAME_DATA* %2, i32 0, i32 5   where "%2" is defined as:   %arrayidx3 = getelementptr inbounds i16* %Data, i32 1024, !dbg !446   %2 = bitcast i16* %arrayidx3 to %struct._FRAME_DATA*, !dbg !446 i.e. at 5 offset in

I think, finally, I want to conclude on this.   The problem I see is that if I comment the case for "simplificaiton of bitcast to gep of original struct in instruction combining", wherein there is a case for if the offset by which GEP moves the pointer is non-zero.   If I disable this code, then structure elements size, I get is

Dear All, I'm using LLVM2.9 for profiling basic block frequency. I'm using following commands. rdpatel55 at ubuntu:~$ llvm-gcc -emit-llvm -O0 -c -o adpcm.bc adpcm.c rdpatel55 at ubuntu:~$ llvm-gcc -emit-llvm -O0 -c -o rawcaudio.bc rawcaudio.c rdpatel55 at ubuntu:~$ llvm-link -o main.bc rawcaudio.bc adpcm.bc rdpatel55 at ubuntu:~$ opt -q -f -insert-edge-profiling -o main.inst main.bc

Hi uRsers, when inverting a 2 by 2 matrix using solve, I encountered a error message: solve.default(sigma, tol = 1e-07) : system is computationally singular: reciprocal condition number = 1.7671e-017 and then I test the determinant of this matrix: 6.341393e-06. In my program, I have a condition block that whether a matrix is invertible like this: if(det(sigma)<1e-7) return NULL;

Hi All,   While collecting type information for "anonymous types", I had below observation.   For the example with anonymous types, given below struct test {   struct {     union {       Char a[4];     };   };   struct {     int b;     char c;   }; };   LLVM 2.6 defines the types as %struct.anon1 = type { %union.anon0} %struct.anon2 = type { i32, i8} %struct.test = type {

Esentially, I'm working on a translator someone started building for llvm2.9 that translates an optimized .lln file to another intermediate language, and I'm porting it to 3.1. There is a new intrinsic that pops up in our test cases' lln files that never used to, llvm.lifetime.start. I looked up the description: "The 'llvm.lifetime.start' intrinsic specifies the start of

This fixes a bug in SmallVectorImpl<>::insert, which were not behaving correctly on inserting an empty range into an empty vector: #include <llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h> #include <cassert> int main() { llvm::SmallVector<int, 1> v, w; llvm::SmallVector<int, 1>::iterator it = v.insert(v.end(), w.begin(), w.end()); assert(it == v.end()); } The insert function(s)

Hi All,   Further exploring the problem I could find that, there is a address offset calculation problem, with the GEP bitcast handling code in instruction combining. Below is table which shows address offset calculation for the struct elements (described earlier).   Type Variable Actual Size(in bytes) pass fail llvm2.9 Address(pass) Size-pass (in bytes) Address (fail) Size -fail (in bytes) with

Hi Pankaj, are you testing this on valid bitcode? The bitcode you sent me did not pass the verifier, i.e. was not valid. Optimizers can be expected to do strange and wrong things if passed invalid bitcode. That is not a bug in LLVM: it is user error if a user doesn't use valid bitcode. Ciao, Duncan. > I think, finally, I want to conclude on this. > The problem I see is that if I

Hi Everybody, I'm working a project which requires assembly code for mips1 architecture for simulation purpose. I checked the latest LLVM3.2 version and found that the backend has been removed. I tried to replace the MIPS backed in LLVM3.2 by the old one in LLVM2.9 (which contains mips1) and adjust some routines to get the backend compiled. However, when llc is used to generate the assembly,

Hi All,   I was searching for, extracting information about 'typedefed struct types' from 'module'. I have 'struct' typedefed in a .h file. I try to use this structure instance inside a function.   My .ll file rightly defines this type in the beginning so that it can be used later. (for example below) %struct.DEBLOCK_UNIT = type { i8*, i8*, i8*, i8, i32, i32,