similar to: [LLVMdev] Change the return type of a function

On 5/7/11 2:01 PM, Gokul Ramaswamy wrote: > Hello All, > > I want to change the return type of a function in a Pass(in a > module Pass). I dont want to change any of the arguments of that function. > Assume that, I can handle the returning values properly inside the > function. Please guide me how to do this ? You need to do the following steps: 1) Create a new function

Thanks John for the reply. Ya, I took a similar approach. I cloned the entire function using CloneFunctionInto() in Cloning.h. Now, I am facing a new Problem. I am not able to understand the concept of ValueToValueMap. I am trying to figure it out by testing it. But I am getting errors like "Referring to an argument in another function!". I am not able to get good examples nor good

Hi Gokul Ramaswamy, > I am new to LLVM. So please help me out. Here is what I am trying to > achieve: > > If there are 2 statements in a source program - > S1; > S2; > > and I know these is no data and control dependency between them and > both take large amount of time to execute. So I want to execute them > in parallel. >

Hi All, I am new to LLVM. So please help me out. Here is what I am trying to achieve: If there are 2 statements in a source program - S1; S2; and I know these is no data and control dependency between them and both take large amount of time to execute. So I want to execute them in parallel. So as S1 starts executing, I want to launch another thread and

Hi Duncan Sands, As I have understood, GOMP and OpenMP provides support for parallelizing program at source program level. But I am at the IR level. That is I am trying to parallelize the IR code. This is the case of automatic parallelization. The programmer writing the code does not have any idea of parallelization going behind the hood. So my question is instead of support at the source

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Gokul Ramaswamy <gokulhcramaswamy at gmail.com > wrote: > Hi Duncan Sands, > > As I have understood, GOMP and OpenMP provides support for > parallelizing program at source program level. But I am at the IR level. > That is I am trying to parallelize the IR code. This is the case of > automatic parallelization. The programmer writing the

Hi all, I am trying to extend a FunctionType to include new parameters. In particular, I want to ensure that the main function has been declared with both argsc and argsv. However there seems to be no easy way to accomplish this: llvm::Function::getFunctionType() returns a a reference to a const object, while modifying only the argument list yields an error during verification since the

On 03/22/2011 01:56 PM, Reid Kleckner wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Gokul Ramaswamy > <gokulhcramaswamy at gmail.com <mailto:gokulhcramaswamy at gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hi Duncan Sands, > > As I have understood, GOMP and OpenMP provides support for > parallelizing program at source program level. But I am at the IR > level. That

I updated dsa to mainline cvs. Poolalloc is broken, however. On Mar 6, 2007, at 3:39 AM, Ryan M. Lefever wrote: > What versions of llvm and llvm-poolalloc should I check out of cvs, in > order to use DSA? In a previous post John Criswell suggested checking > llvm and llvm-poolalloc out of cvs using the -r release_19 flag. > However, there were several post later that said that

What versions of llvm and llvm-poolalloc should I check out of cvs, in order to use DSA? In a previous post John Criswell suggested checking llvm and llvm-poolalloc out of cvs using the -r release_19 flag. However, there were several post later that said that changes should not be made to the release_19 branch. At any rate, I've not seen any update on which versions of llvm and

Hi, The poolalloc library fails in TransformFunctionBody.cpp, line 746 --- Value *ArgVal = ConstantAggregateZero::get(PoolAllocate::PoolDescPtrTy); --- opt -load /path_to_lib/libpoolalloc.dylib -poolalloc constaggr.bc -o opt.bc -f triggers the problem (bc file attached). Assertion failed: ((isa<StructType>(Ty) || isa<ArrayType>(Ty) || isa<VectorType>(Ty)) &&

I'm starting to play around with poolalloc for the first time. I tried to build it as follows: 1) Clone llvm's git repo, and build it with cmake + ninja. 2) cd .../llvm/projects 3) git clone git at github.com:llvm-mirror/poolalloc.git When I went to re-run ninja, (or even CMake by itself), I get errors like the following (truncated for brevity). Any suggestions for whether I'm

Dear Christian, First, I've never used CMake to build poolalloc. I've always used the autoconf-based build system. It is possible that the CMake files for poolalloc are broken. I recommend using the autoconf-based build system. Second, you'll be pleased to know that someone (I think Will Dietz) has gotten DSA working with mainline LLVM. The DSA code compiles, but not the

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 5:10 PM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> wrote: > On 2/28/11 10:04 AM, Frits van Bommel wrote: >> I don't think a full clone is necessary, since he wants to replace the >> function. He only needs to create the new function and splice in the >> body of the old one. > > That is exactly what MakeFunctionClone() does.  It creates a

Hi Will, John Criswell thought that perhaps you've gotten DSA (but not poolalloc) working with the mainline LLVM code. If that's true, is that something you intend to share? I for one would love to be able to use it. - Christian On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 12:06 PM, John Criswell <jtcriswel at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Christian, > > First, I've never used CMake to

Hello, today I download poolalloc from " https://github.com/llvm-mirror/poolalloc". and I compiled it with LLVM3.3. Then when I excute "make",I get the error: AddressTakenAnalysis.cpp:18:30:fatal error:llvm/IR/CallSite.h: No such file or directory. ​I correct the path of callsite.h to "llvm/Support/Callsite.h". there is another error: AddressTakenAnalysis.cpp:In

> On 1/26/11 3:06 PM, songlh at cs.wisc.edu wrote: >>> [snip] >>> -- John T. >> Sorry, I am asking the second question. >> " >> how to determine, within an LLVM pass, what the >> possible target(s) of an indirect function call might be? > > There are at least two solutions. > > The first is to use the CallGraph analysis pass. It

Hello, Iam getting the following error whem adding new task in redmine -- Internal error An error occurred on the page you were trying to access. If you continue to experience problems please contact your redMine administrator for assistance. Please advise. Thanks in advance. Regards, Gokul -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

On 2/28/11 10:04 AM, Frits van Bommel wrote: > 2011/2/28 John Criswell<criswell at illinois.edu>: >> On 2/28/11 6:31 AM, Gabriel Rodríguez wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I am trying to extend a FunctionType to include new parameters. In >> particular, I want to >> ensure that the main function has been declared with both argsc and argsv. >>

2011/2/28 John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu>: > On 2/28/11 6:31 AM, Gabriel Rodríguez wrote: > > Hi all, > > I am trying to extend a FunctionType to include new parameters. In > particular, I want to > ensure that the main function has been declared with both argsc and argsv. > However > there seems to be no easy way to accomplish this: >