similar to: [LLVMdev] ReplaceInstWithInst appears to invalidate BB iterator?

Hello, I have a call to ReplaceInstWithInst(Instruction *From, Instruction *To) inside of a for loop iterating through a BasicBlock::iterator. On the very next pass after I replace the instruction, the iterator appears to be invalidated. Is this supposed to happen or am I doing something silly? Is there a more appropriate way to do this? Thanks, -Justin

Hi, In my source code, I have the following declaration char a[30]; When I'm running the following (Assuming that I is an instruction pointer pointing to the instruction to be replaced, i.e. %a = alloca [30 x i8], align 1): ArrayType* arr = ArrayType::get(IntegerType::get(getGlobalContext(), 8), 10); AllocaInst* pa = new AllocaInst(arr, "blah"); BasicBlock::iterator ii(*I);

Hello everyone, I wanted to copy a function from one file to another. The file that I wanted to copy the function into contains a function with the same name and same number of instructions. I decided to just replace the instructions with those of the other function. I am doing all of this from within a function pass. *1.* I created a function pass in which I extract a function using

Hi, Thanks both of you for the help. I just missed that Create function had many optional arguments... sorry for that. However my problem wasn't coming from here (IRBuilder CreateCall function still return a pointer to CallInst so I just added 2 times the call?). I didn't wanted to detail the all issue previously because I knew I had a problem with my syntax. So here's my problem: I

What are the rules regarding iterator stability for SmallPtrSet? I'm running into a problem where erasing an element seems to invalidate iterators that are not pointing at the erased element. Specifically, the set is in small mode, I advance an iterator to the last element in the set (not end(), but one before) and then erase the second-to-last element. I understand that the last element

On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, David Greene wrote: > What are the rules regarding iterator stability for SmallPtrSet? > I'm running into a problem where erasing an element seems > to invalidate iterators that are not pointing at the erased element. Interesting question. > Specifically, the set is in small mode, I advance an iterator to the last > element in the set (not end(), but one

On May 27, 2008, at 2:01 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > On May 27, 2008, at 1:40 PM, Mike Stump wrote: >> >> From n2461: >> >>> 8 The insert members shall not affect the validity of iterators and >>> references to the container, and the erase members shall invalidate >>> only iterators and references to the erased elements. >> >> Pretty

Hi everyone, I am trying to replace the call of a certain function with a call to another function. It would for example replace the following: %call = tail call noalias i8* @func(i64 10) by %call = tail call noalias i8* @other_func(i64 10) I managed to declare other_func correctly but I am having troubles to understand how I should proceed to do the replacement. I tried to use

Hello, I'm trying to registrate a Nuance Server in Asterisk (using SIP) with no success. It seems that Nuance does not send any secret/password (there is no way to define it!), this is the list of parameters that Nuance provides for registration: audio.sip.UserAgentURI=sip:user@domain audio.sip.UserAgentPort=<port> audio.sip.ProxyServerURI=sip:<IP>:<port>

LLVM is built in Release mode. The version is 6.0.0. I think that a similar code worked on verison 3.9.0. It is probably a null pointer dereference occurring in eraseFromParent(). I checked and reconfirmed that the instruction had no uses. Perhaps I should rebuild LLVM. Thanks. On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 9:03 PM, mayuyu.io <admin at mayuyu.io> wrote: > Hmmmm that’s strange. Do you get an

Dragon NaturallySpeaking 9.0 Preferred installs and runs. However, DNS 9.5 installs well but does not. The output is as follows. I have been told that there is an oleacc function that has not been implemented in wine, but does anyone else have any suggestions? susan at ubuntu:~/.wine/drive_c/Program Files/Nuance/NaturallySpeaking9/Program$ wine natspeak Xlib: extension "GLX" missing

Please keep replies on the list. Now you've missed "InputIterator must be a random-access iterator pointing to contiguous storage (e.g. a std::vector<>::iterator). Checks are made for random-accessness but not for contiguous storage as that would incur runtime overhead." from CallInst's constructor (although that comment should be on Create()). Function::arg_iterator

hi this is my first post having switched to mint so I am clueless but I need to install dragon naturally speaking 11 on my lenovo g560 i used this tutorial http://appdb.winehq.org/appview.php?versionId=3227 it went pretty well until it said it was "Replacing default with C:/program"(i can see that that could be a problem but i don't know how to stop it) i was runing it in a terminal

Hi, How can I integrate Asterisk to Nuance TTS engine instead of Cepstral? Has anybody done this? How is the architecture and can Java AGI be used to communicate between them? regards, Vela Sivasankaran -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20091021/56254a0e/attachment.htm

Hello Luca, Thank you for your response. I?m familiar with speech recognition and TTS, but new to MRCP. Yes, the 100k options is used for names in a directory listing. In the pre-MRCP support, Nuance ASR used API events/methods for the application to tell ASR when the prompt was playing and when it stopped. If ASR detected speech, it would signal an event so we would stop playing the prompt.

On May 23, 2008, at 10:19 AM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > On May 23, 2008, at 4:10 AM, Nicolas Capens wrote: > >> I updated from 2.2 to the latest SVN head and I now get a debug >> assert in BranchFolder::RemoveBlocksWithHash: “vector iterators >> incompatible”. I’m using Visual C++ 2005. I think this is the >> culprit code: >> >>

I am trying to change this define void @main(float* noalias %arg0, float* noalias %arg1, float* noalias %arg2) { entrypoint: %0 = bitcast float* %arg1 to <4 x float>* intothis define void @main(float* noalias %arg0, float* noalias %arg1, float* noalias %arg2) { entrypoint: %0 = getelementptr float* %arg1, i64 0 %1 = bitcast float* %0 to <4 x float>* I must be close but

Hi, I have the following instruction in my IR- %call2 = call i8* @strcpy(i8* %1, i8* %2) #2 I intend to change call to strcpy with strncpy. I have included the following code in runOnFunction, so that when it is strcpy's turn to be invoked, strncpy is invoked instead. Assuming I* is the strcpy instruction, CallInst* x=new

Hi,I have the following instruction in my IR-%call2 = call i8* @strcpy(i8* %1, i8* %2) #2I intend to change call to strcpy with strncpy. I have included the following code in runOnFunction, so that when it is strcpy's turn to be invoked, strncpy is invoked instead.Assuming I* is the strcpy instruction,CallInst* x=new

Hi, I have a question about the modify of instruction: Say I want to modify %a = getelementptr %struct %S, long 0, ubyte 1 into %a.f0 = getelementptr int* %S.f0, long 0 There are 3 ways I can think of to implement, but I'm not sure what should I do. 1. I can use new GetElementPtr to create a new instruction and use ReplaceInstWithInst() function to replace the old one. 2. I can use new