Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Target-dependant tests in generic directories"
2011 Sep 20
2
[LLVMdev] Clang build "clang-native-arm-cortex-a9" is broken
The host c++ standard library is missing <utility>, it appears.
On Sep 20, 2011, at 11:22 AM, Galina Kistanova wrote:
> Please use the correct link :
> http://63.145.236.72:8011
> and ignore the previous.
>
> Also log for broken build is here:
>
> make[1]: Entering directory
>
2010 Nov 23
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM unit and regression tests, enabled targets and conditions
Hello everyone,
I'm wrestling with the LLVM unit and regression tests now and would
like to discuss some changes to make.
I will be preparing patches, but any input/ideas are welcome.
I leave "where the tests should run" question out for the scope yet.
Let's review what kind of tests we have and how to handle them
correctly.
We have 3 types of unit and regression tests:
1.)
2011 Sep 20
1
[LLVMdev] [cfe-commits] Clang build "clang-native-arm-cortex-a9" is broken
Yeah. That code has been there since r91421 and wouldn't have failed recently otherwise. Did something change on the host?
-eric
On Sep 20, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Jim Grosbach wrote:
> The host c++ standard library is missing <utility>, it appears.
>
>
> On Sep 20, 2011, at 11:22 AM, Galina Kistanova wrote:
>
>> Please use the correct link :
>>
2011 Sep 20
0
[LLVMdev] Clang build "clang-native-arm-cortex-a9" is broken
Please use the correct link :
http://63.145.236.72:8011
and ignore the previous.
Also log for broken build is here:
make[1]: Entering directory
`/home/buildslave/zorg/buildbot/osuosl/slave/clang-native-arm-cortex-a9/llvm/lib/Support'
llvm[1]: Compiling APFloat.cpp for Release+Asserts build
llvm[1]: Compiling APInt.cpp for Release+Asserts build
In file included from APFloat.cpp:15:
In file
2017 Mar 14
2
LLVM Lab SVN mirror is behind
The SVN mirror is back up and running.
Please let me know if you would see any issues.
Thanks for your patience.
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com>
wrote:
> A quick update.
>
> The SVN mirror got corrupted by r297634. Svnsync does not like huge
> commits.
> I'm in the middle of restoring and synch-ing up the mirror. Too soon to
2011 Oct 27
2
[LLVMdev] How to add builder info. Need advice
Hello everybody,
I want to put some kind of instruction on how to add new slave to llvm master.
I think it should be somewhere on llvm.org, but not sure on exact place.
Any comments/suggestions will be appreciated.
Thanks
Galina
If you want to add your build configuration to the LLVM buildbot infrastructure.
1. Check the existing build configurations to make sure the one you
are
2011 Sep 21
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-commits] Clang build "clang-native-arm-cortex-a9" is broken
I have tracked it down to the real reason.
The revisions 139934-139937 has changed the order in which configure
chooses a compiler. Clang is checked first, then llvm-gcc, and then
gcc.
I can see the reason for this change.
However, in this particular case it has broken the build because
Ubuntu includes clang 2.8 which doesn't know where includes are.
I have removed clang from the host to
2011 Sep 20
3
[LLVMdev] Clang build "clang-native-arm-cortex-a9" is broken
Hello everybody,
Just a short note that clang build "clang-native-arm-cortex-a9" is
broken and the very last successful build was for revision 139932.
All newer revisions fail.
The builder is available here:
http://172.16.0.135:8011/waterfall
Thanks
Galina
2011 Oct 27
0
[LLVMdev] How to add builder info. Need advice
Put it in the llvm/docs directory and link to the main documentation page? Maybe add a link the main buildbot page too.
-Tanya
On Oct 26, 2011, at 5:54 PM, Galina Kistanova wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I want to put some kind of instruction on how to add new slave to llvm master.
> I think it should be somewhere on llvm.org, but not sure on exact place.
>
> Any
2020 Oct 08
2
[cfe-dev] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
Hi Paula,
This error is fine. The buildbot has tested the worker version. 0.8.x
apparently does not have that method.
The error gets handled gracefully on the server side. At least it seems so
so far.
That should not prevent your bot from connecting.
Thanks
Galina
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 2:11 PM Paula Askar <paulatoth at google.com> wrote:
> Hey Andrzej,
>
> What are you seeing
2017 Nov 09
2
Problem with 'sed' on one Windows bot?
Thanks, Galina. It doesn't explain why the test worked on some bots but not this one, but Justin's workaround is okay with me.
--paulr
From: Galina Kistanova [mailto:gkistanova at gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2017 10:09 AM
To: Robinson, Paul
Cc: Davide Italiano; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Problem with 'sed' on one Windows bot?
There is nothing
2013 Jan 14
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM master will be unavailable tonight
Hello everyone,
I have migrated the buildmaster to the PostgreSQL.
All the data has been preserved and all builds are valid (none of the
builds has been affected by the migration and restart).
I have tested and watched it over the weekend, and it seems everything
works fine.
The response time of the WebUI is fine.
Please let me know if you will see or notice anything odd.
Thanks
Galina
On
2018 Mar 12
2
New LLD performance builder
Disabling swap and having a single CPU in the shield group didn't change
much, besides cpu-migrations and context-switches, which now are 0
obviously.
That clustering remains the same. It is also stable to the number of runs
(I have changed the test to run 20 times in the middle of that range on the
right).
http://lnt.llvm.org/db_default/v4/link/graph?highlight_run=426&plot.9=1.9.6
2015 Feb 18
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Raise minimum required CMake version to 3.0
Galina and Takumi,
Are we ready to update the minimum required version to 2.8.12.2?
-Chris
> On Feb 12, 2015, at 2:35 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote:
>
> Chandler's feedback was that we should go to 2.8.12.2 instead of 3.0 because of Ubuntu's LTS release.
>
> -Chris
>
>
>
> On Feb 12, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova
2020 Oct 08
3
[cfe-dev] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
Our Flang-aarch64 buildbots just won't connect to the main Buildbot
master anymore. I switched them to the staging buildbot master instead
and it seems fine for now. Is there anything that we can/should tweak at
our end?
http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/waterfall?tags=flang
-Andrzej
On 08/10/2020 00:31, Galina Kistanova via cfe-dev wrote:
> They are online now -
2012 Dec 11
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-lab-wg] FNT testers reporting success even though they failed
The problem remains after the buildmaster restart.
Thanks
Galina
-----Original Message-----
From: David Blaikie [mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 11:42 AM
To: Galina Kistanova
Cc: Duncan Sands; llvm-lab-wg at lists.minormatter.com; Galina Kistanova; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: [llvm-lab-wg] FNT testers reporting success even though they failed
On Tue,
2012 Dec 17
1
[LLVMdev] [llvm-lab-wg] FNT testers reporting success even though they failed
This issue is back: FNT bots are reporting success in spite of tests failing,
and the "report" text is empty again. Did someone change something?
Ciao, Duncan.
On 12/12/12 07:53, Duncan Sands wrote:
> On 11/12/12 23:16, Galina Kistanova wrote:
>> The problem remains after the buildmaster restart.
>
> The FNT builders are now all failing again, and the "report"
2012 Dec 12
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-lab-wg] FNT testers reporting success even though they failed
On 11/12/12 23:16, Galina Kistanova wrote:
> The problem remains after the buildmaster restart.
The FNT builders are now all failing again, and the "report" is no longer
empty. Does anyone know what fixed them?
Ciao, Duncan.
>
> Thanks
>
> Galina
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Blaikie [mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday,
2015 Jun 18
2
[LLVMdev] Contributing a buildbot for the BPF backend
Thank you.
Alexei just committed the change to SVN.
Regards,
Marco Leogrande
Sent by a carbon-based life form; hence, it may contain repetitions,
inaccuracies, logical fallacies and repetitions.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote:
> LGTM.
> Please commit.
>
> Thanks
>
> Galina
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 8:32 PM,
2016 Oct 31
2
[Zorg] Simplify ClangBuilder
On 31 October 2016 at 19:46, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote:
> I applied it and reconfigured the master.
Thanks Galina!
Marco, the build is complaining about Ninja:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-bpf-build/builds/414/steps/cmake%20stage%201/logs/stdio
CMake was unable to find a build program corresponding to "Ninja"
Now I remember we used ninja by