similar to: [LLVMdev] Error compiling ConstantProp.cpp

I am using llvm-2.6 and the ConstProp.cpp file is http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/ConstantProp_8cpp_source.html and the exact error message is: llvm[0]: Compiling ConstantProp.cpp for Release build (PIC) /home/tarun/Desktop/compiler/LLVM/llvm-2.6/include/llvm/Analysis/ConstantFolding.h: In member function ‘virtual bool<unnamed>::ConstantPropagation::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&)’:

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 5:27 PM, tarun agrawal <tarun at cse.iitb.ac.in> wrote: > I am using llvm-2.6  and the ConstProp.cpp file is > http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/ConstantProp_8cpp_source.html > > and the exact error message is: > > llvm[0]: Compiling ConstantProp.cpp for Release build  (PIC) >

While compiling the ConstantProp.cpp I am getting the following error. error: too few arguments to function ‘llvm::Constant* llvm::ConstantFoldInstruction(llvm::Instruction*, llvm::LLVMContext&, const llvm::TargetData*) Regards Tarun -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 5:07 PM, tarun agrawal <tarun at cse.iitb.ac.in> wrote: > While compiling the ConstantProp.cpp I am getting the following error. > > error: too few arguments to function ‘llvm::Constant* > llvm::ConstantFoldInstruction(llvm::Instruction*, llvm::LLVMContext&, const > llvm::TargetData*) If you're reporting a build error, please include the

On 5/3/11 4:08 PM, tarun agrawal wrote: > HI > > I know it is a very simple question not worth asking here but I am > really struggling pls help me out.. This is a question worth asking; it's just that not everyone can answer all the time. :) If all you want to do is to follow the SSA def-use chain within a single function, then this is very easy. All you have to do is use

HI I know it is a very simple question not worth asking here but I am really struggling pls help me out.. On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:10 PM, tarun agrawal <tarun at cse.iitb.ac.in> wrote: > Hi, > > I need to get all the basic blocks that are there, in the path from > definition of an instruction to use of that instruction. > > > Regards > Tarun > --------------

Dear Tarun, It just occurred to me that this may or may not be what you are asking about. This only finds basic blocks along the def-use chain of an instruction; it does not find all basic blocks along all paths between two instructions. I don't know of an algorithm off-hand for the latter, but if you understand how to iterate over def-use chains and the control-flow graph, then

Hi, I copied the code from LLVM2.6 below. line 81 removes 'I' from the worklist. But 'I' is already removed from the list at line 67 when it is popped from the list. Could the loop (line 73-75) insert this I into the worklist again? In the case where 'I' can be constant-folding, Line 80 says 'I' is a dead instruction. Can 'I' appears in its def-use chain?

Hi, I need to get all the basic blocks that are there, in the path from definition of an instruction to use of that instruction. Regards Tarun -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110503/4d3852b7/attachment.html>

On 4/16/11 7:01 PM, tarun agrawal wrote: > The clone llvm:CloneBasicBlock copies the phi function in the > replicated basic block from the original basic block. After you clone the basic block, you can probably replace the phi instruction with another value of your choice. If you're adding variables, you'll probably want to create them as allocas and use loads and stores to

On 5/3/11 4:14 PM, tarun agrawal wrote: > Hi > > I have clone a basic block using CloneBasicBlock function but it does > not clone the predecessor with it. I am not able to figure out, how to > set the predecessor of the cloned basic block. LLVM's CFG is explicitly maintained by the terminator instructions within each basic block. In order to change the CFG, you have to

Hi I have clone a basic block using CloneBasicBlock function but it does not clone the predecessor with it. I am not able to figure out, how to set the predecessor of the cloned basic block. Tarun -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110504/74cdc609/attachment.html>

Thanks John, I know how to iterate through def-use chains and I also have realized the need for an algorithm to do the work. But the algorithm I am able to figure out is not linear in time. It wold be a great help if someone suggest me a way to get all basic-block along all path between two instruction. On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:00 AM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> wrote: >

The clone llvm:CloneBasicBlock copies the phi function in the replicated basic block from the original basic block. I don't want the copy of phi in relplicated block. For now I am creating .bc file with -O0 option so that it doesn't generate phi function in first place. Is this a good approach or there are some other function available for it. Tarun On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 5:22 AM, Eli

On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 8:44 AM, tarun agrawal <tarun at cse.iitb.ac.in> wrote: > Hi, > > I am using alias analysis to determine whether two values are alias or not. > But I am not able to figure out the algorithm that is being used to > determine > May , Must and No Alias. Here is the algorithm in high-level: http://llvm.org/docs/AliasAnalysis.html#exist > > >

Dear Tarun, Swarup Sahoo and I wrote some LLVM passes for dynamic slicing for LLVM 2.6. I believe we had planned to make the code publicly available as part of the Giri project (http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/giri/trunk), but due to other commitments, we have not moved the code into that SVN repository yet. Let me check with Vikram and Swarup to see about getting a copy of the code to you.

Just to be clear, I have to add a function name printf in the module with no body. And I can call the function. This will automatically call the printf function which is defined in the library. Tarun Agrawal On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:34 PM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu>wrote: > On 2/8/12 11:55 AM, tarun agrawal wrote: > > Hi, > > I am trying to insert a

Should ConstantProp.cpp also be removed? It doesn't look like it's been worked on in over 10 years, and aside from check-llvm lit tests, the only use is in llvm/unittests/ExecutionEngine/MCJIT/MCJITAPITest.cpp via LLVMAddConstantPropagationPass. (it hasn't been ported to the new pass manager which is why I'm asking) On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 6:01 PM Chris Lattner via llvm-dev <

HI, My name is tarun and iam new to this list.. Can any one please help me ?? How can i kill a rsync.. Suppose if iam in middle of rsync of a whole 10gb of data. Can i kill rsync in the middle using kill "rsync process id" and resume it later, wouldnt it result in any errors if we kill rsync suddenly. Or is there any signal to send to rsync to terminate it cleanly..Doest rsync have

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:32 PM, tarun agrawal <tarun at cse.iitb.ac.in> wrote: > Hi, > > I am writing a pass for constant propagation using graph restructuring ( > code duplication). I am facing following difficulties.. > > 1) I need to replicate the basic block but without phi function in the > replicated block. How can I do this. > > 2) I need to insert that