similar to: [LLVMdev] Mismatch options between profile.pl and opt

On Oct 24, 2011, at 8:29 PM, 陳韋任 wrote: > Hi, all > > Take the discussion thread [1] as an example. Although "-help-hidden" > is not intended to be use by normal folk, I think there should be > somewhere notes "-help-hidden" revealing more options which might be > needed by developers. I thought it will be a good idea to mention the > existence of

Hi, all Take the discussion thread [1] as an example. Although "-help-hidden" is not intended to be use by normal folk, I think there should be somewhere notes "-help-hidden" revealing more options which might be needed by developers. I thought it will be a good idea to mention the existence of "-help-hidden" on the web page, but the patch I sent brought some

> Does anyone know which version of LLVM support "opt --insert-block-profiling command"? Thanks! You might try it by yourself. You can download LLVM x86 binary from the website, which makes the testing easier. Regards, chenwj -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.) Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667 Homepage:

Turns out I was using `opt -profile-loader` instead of `opt -path-profile-loader`. Switching to the path profile loader fixed the problem. Wim On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 3:18 AM, 陳韋任 <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 04:10:29PM +0100, Wim Vander Schelden wrote: > > I'm having the same problem. Does anyone know what's causing this? > > >

Sorry, but I didn't find a Makefile under KERNELDIR. Why is it necessary to check that makefile anyway??? As to the Makefile that I posted before, if I can changed that file to build the .c into .bc rather then .o, that would also solve my problem! Thank you! -- 祝好！ 甄凯 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On 24 April 2011 00:57, 陳韋任 <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > Hi, Zhao > > You can apply the attachment to LLVM 2.9 Release. It has been tested > on FreeBSD/x86. > Hi Chen, may I commit this (updated to include GCDAProfiling.cpp) to LLVM SVN? Nick > > Regards, > chenwj > > -- > Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) > Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information

Mr. Chen, The link is out of date, please go to http://ccckmit.wikidot.com/ and select LLVM row in the table. My first version book is put on my brother's web site. Now, I create my Dropbox link. Best regards Jonathan --- 12/11/19 (一)，陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> 寫道： 寄件者: 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> 主旨: Re: [LLVMdev] My documentation

On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 6:01 PM, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) < chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > Hi Jan, > > Why do you think TargetELFWriterInfo is not used (IIUC)? > I see a lot of targets inherit class TargetELFWriterInfo > for their ELF writer. > > Yes, a lot of targets inherit it, but it looks like nothing ever calls getELFWriterInfo() (anymore) to get access to the

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 03:48:29PM +0800, 15102925731 wrote: > BTW, the Makefile is as folllow, > > CC := gcc > obj-m := hellomodule.o > KERNELDIR := /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build > PWD := $(shell pwd) > modules: > $(MAKE) -C $(KERNELDIR) M=$(PWD) modules ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Check the Makefile under KERNELDIR directory. Regards, chenwj -- Wei-Ren Chen

Hi, Sorry I did not precise that, but I'm already doing that... I have, as you say, two different director, one for source and one for build (where I run my configure)... Cheers ________________________________________ De : 陳韋任 [chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw] Date d'envoi : mardi 8 mai 2012 05:21 À : Rinaldini Julien Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List Objet : Re: [LLVMdev] svn trunk

> The logic here is that these flags should only be used by people looking at code. For example, if a pass has a hidden option that controls some knob, you should only find out about it by reading the code. We don't want people surfing through all the hidden options to "see what is available". I see. Maybe we can tell people the existence of "-help-hidden" and also

This looks relevant to me for your issue. Grabbing the cxxabi.h from there may work: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.clang.devel/9391 -- Aaron Myles Landwehr On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 1:33 AM, 陳韋任 <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > Hi, all > > I am trying to selfhost LLVM and Clang. Below is my flow, > > Step 1. Build LLVM and Clang by using native gcc

Hi chenwj, According to the link, I found that during the compiling process, the option "-emit-llvm" must be added to generate immediate object *.o. [hanfeng at os-wstation02 fft]llvm-gcc -c fft.c -emit-llvm Then using llvm-ld will generate two files - a shell excutable and a llvm bytecode data both of which would run perfect. [hanfeng at os-wstation02 fft]llvm-ld -o FFT fft.o [hanfeng

thank yang,thank Wei-Ren! i feel i am a question boy,because i has another question now. i want to check if a program output right result,which example in llvm/test/* can give me some idea? suppose i have a helloworld program if it run well,it can give me a result "helloworld",so i want to check if the result is "helloworld". best wishes! changcheng On Tue, Aug 28, 2012

Hi Justin, Is there any progress on new CUDA by llvm PTX? Cheers, Dan On 11 January 2013 07:57, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw>wrote: > Hi Justin, > > I believe the PTX section in the link below need some love, > updating "lib/Target/PTX" to "lib/Target/NVPTX" for example. > Would you like to take a look? > >

Removed from trunk. Pawel can decide if its necessary to update the tarballs. Thanks for the report! Apparently git-svn does not delete removed directories. On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:36 AM, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) < chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > Hi Pawel, > > PTX already be replaced with NVPTX. However, PTX subdirectory > still sit in lib/Target in 3.2 release. Do you

Right, I forgot to update that originally. I also have a separate document in the works that goes into more detail for NVPTX. On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:57 AM, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) < chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > Hi Justin, > > I believe the PTX section in the link below need some love, > updating "lib/Target/PTX" to "lib/Target/NVPTX" for example.

I suggest u grep how this file is used. Since it is included in xxInstrInfo.td and this is its only use, we can conclude that this file does nothng more than defining some helper tablegen classes and we thus can totally move these definitions into xxInstrInfo.td and then remove XXInstFormat.td Regards. 在 2013-2-6 下午4:52，"陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen)" <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw>写道： >

> Do you think it's O.K. to put the link somewhere else on the web site? I have been considering adding a page of assorted links to external documentation. I'm not sure if anybody else wants such a page though. -- Sean Silva On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:25 AM, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > Hi Chris, > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:24:39PM

Could you tell me the current status of MIPS JIT? On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:38 PM, 陳韋任 <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > > Thanks for your information. > > Could you suggest any other framework that I could use for making a > custom JIT > > for ARM? > > I am doing research on JIT compilation for a heterogeneous processor > system. > > If not for