similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm-gcc

On 4/19/11 4:37 PM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: >> llvm-gcc -O3 -emit-llvm hello.c -c -o hello.bc >> it shows to me i should install llvm-gcc4.5 >> when i have installed llvm-gcc 4.5 i get all the times a wrong bc file >> as output, because when i try to execute it with lli it says to me >> invalid signature. > There is no llvm-gcc 4.5. Report this bug to Ubuntu,

>>  i would like to add the value of  the size od a basic bloc to this >>> global variable >>> how to convert the size of a basic bloc to integer? >> >> Size = number of LLVM IR instructions there? If yes, just grab the >> number, convert it to ConstantIn and use as an initializer / store to >> variable. >> > > There's a typo in the

> llvm-gcc -O3 -emit-llvm hello.c -c -o hello.bc > it shows to me i should install llvm-gcc4.5 > when i have installed llvm-gcc 4.5 i get all the times a wrong bc file > as output, because when i try to execute it with lli it says to me > invalid signature. There is no llvm-gcc 4.5. Report this bug to Ubuntu, because it seems they hacked the stuff somehow. >  i would like to add

Hi Nabila, > 1- I have installed llvm-gcc 4.2 and llvm 2.8 with the synaptic > package manager(ubuntu 10.10) > every time i do this commande: > llvm-gcc -O3 -emit-llvm hello.c -c -o hello.bc > it shows to me i should install llvm-gcc4.5 > when i have installed llvm-gcc 4.5 i get all the times a wrong bc file > as output, because when i try to execute it with lli it says to me

Hi all, Please i need help, I have a method that takes 2 arguments with type char *: void branchPredict(char *b1, char *b2){ --- -- } i'm supposed to add this method, in an IR basic bloc: to add it into a basic bloc i do: //i: is the basic bloc std::vector<Value*> void_43_params; Constant* tbname = ConstantArray::get(M.getContext(),i->getNameStr() , true); Constant* pbname =

2011/4/25 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> > Hi Nabila, > > > i would like insert a fucntion call at the end of each basic bloc > > you can't, because only terminators are allowed at the end of a basic > block. > However you can try to insert the call before the terminator. > Yes, i mean before the termininator, My problem is how to call a method suppose

hi all, i would like insert a fucntion call at the end of each basic bloc the fucntion i have defined and declared at the begining of the module ie i have written a pass derived from a module pass virtual bool runOnModule(Module & M){ // i declared the fucntion and defined it for (Module::iterator a = M.begin(), b = M.end(); a != b; for (Function::iterator i = a->begin(), e =

Hi Nabila, > i would like insert a fucntion call at the end of each basic bloc you can't, because only terminators are allowed at the end of a basic block. However you can try to insert the call before the terminator. ... > i tried to see an example with the demo, i saw that it instead of calling the > function, it repeats all the instruction that are existing in the function >

Hi Nabila, > My problem is how to call a method > suppose this fucntion > void A(int x) > { > x=x+1; > > } > > should i define this function and declare it at the beginig of the module and > create for it a basic bloc? you can just declare the function (i.e. no need to give it a body), and call it. You can then link with an object file that defines it. This is

On 5/20/11 5:46 PM, Nabila ABDESSAIED wrote: > Hi all, > > Please i need help, I have a method that takes 2 arguments with type > char *: > void branchPredict(char *b1, char *b2){ > --- > -- > } > i'm supposed to add this method, in an IR basic bloc: > to add it into a basic bloc i do: The problem is that you are passing arrays to the function instead of

I have defined the fucntion in another object file and linked it to the in fact the fucntion is : void consume(int , int * ); std::vector<Value*> int32_16_params; int32_16_params.push_back(inValue);//inValue is ConstantInt* inValue int32_16_params.push_back(gvar_int32_y); CallInst* int32_16 = CallInst::Create(func_consume, int32_16_params.begin(), int32_16_params.end(), "",

Hi Evan, Please note that I'm not trying to compile from C code, I try to generate functions at run-time directly. I want to keep it target-independent too, so I can't use intrinsics either. Cheers, -Nicolas -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Evan Cheng Sent: Thursday, 08 May, 2008 23:31 To: LLVM

Hi Matthijs, Yes, I've turned off the link-time optimizations (otherwise it just propagates my constant vectors and immediate prints the result). :-) Here's essentially what I try to generate: void add(float z[4], float x[4], float y[4]) { z[0] = x[0] + y[0]; z[1] = x[1] + y[1]; z[2] = x[2] + y[2]; z[3] = x[3] + y[3]; } And here's part of the output from the online

llvm does not automatically vectorize your scalar code (as least for now). You have to write gcc generic vector code or use vector builtins. Evan On May 8, 2008, at 1:46 PM, Nicolas Capens wrote: > Hi Matthijs, > > Yes, I've turned off the link-time optimizations (otherwise it just > propagates my constant vectors and immediate prints the result). :-) > > Here's

Dear, I have a dataset with 4 subjects (see ID in example), and 4 treatment (see TRT in example) which are tested on 2 locations and in 3 blocs. By using Lattice dotplot, I made a graph that shows the raw data per location and per bloc. In that graph, I would like to have a reference line per bloc that refers to the first treatment (T1). However, I can not find how to do that. I can make

I had a failure over the weekend of my ext3 filesystems. Hardware: Dell 2550 (dual PIII 1 Ghz, 1GB ram, Acenic GigE card) Software: linux-2.4.14 ext3-2.4-0.9.15-2414 Trond's NFS patches (pathconf, tune,read,rpc_blk) The filesystem is RAID0 using LVM (1.0.1-rc4). The disks are connected using fiber channel (qlogic 2200, qlax00-4.27beta). I was generating high load on my nfs

Dear all, I tried to use layout argument in xyplot to get one panel per page. I have a dataframe named 'data' with the following variables: x, y = coords, sub, bloc = 2-level factors, etat = 5-level factor, I did : > lset(theme = col.whitebg()) > xyplot(y ~ x | bloc*sub , data=data, groups=etat, + layout=c(0,1,4), + main="Etat des plantes dans chaque

2011/4/26 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> > Hi Nabila, > > > Now when i tried this pass an error says: >> Wrong type for attribute noalias >> tail call void @consume(i32 noalias 3, i32* @y) nounwind >> > > noalias is only for arguments of pointer type. You probably meant it to > be on the second argument rather than the first. I suggest you

Hello R-gurus, I'm trying to adjust different growth curves to a rather extensive dataset. I wrote up a function to go through all of them, but am encountering a problem : among the more than 1000 curves I have, obviously for some of them I encounter conversion problems. I'd like for my function to keep going to the next curve and store the fact that for curve number X I had a convergence

2011/4/26 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> > Hi Nabila, > > Now when i tried this pass an error says: >> Wrong type for attribute noalias >> tail call void @consume(i32 noalias 3, i32* @y) nounwind >> >> >> noalias is only for arguments of pointer type. You probably meant it >> to >> be on the second argument