similar to: [LLVMdev] Coarse-grained parallelism

On 4/19/11 5:57 AM, Andreas Wilhelm wrote: > Hello, > > I found some code within the pool allocation project to identify > parallelizable function calls. > Unfortunately the functionality isn't part of the current release of > poolalloc (in release 14 it was). Can you tell me in what file(s) this is implemented? I wasn't aware that the poolalloc project had such an

Am 19.04.2011 um 16:44 schrieb John Criswell: > On 4/19/11 5:57 AM, Andreas Wilhelm wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I found some code within the pool allocation project to identify parallelizable function calls. >> Unfortunately the functionality isn't part of the current release of poolalloc (in release 14 it was). > > Can you tell me in what file(s) this

On 04/20/2011 08:05 AM, Andreas Wilhelm wrote: > Am 19.04.2011 um 16:44 schrieb John Criswell: > >> On 4/19/11 5:57 AM, Andreas Wilhelm wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I found some code within the pool allocation project to identify >>> parallelizable function calls. >>> Unfortunately the functionality isn't part of the current release of

Am 22.04.2011 um 18:03 schrieb Tobias Grosser: > On 04/20/2011 08:05 AM, Andreas Wilhelm wrote: >> Am 19.04.2011 um 16:44 schrieb John Criswell: >> >>> On 4/19/11 5:57 AM, Andreas Wilhelm wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I found some code within the pool allocation project to identify >>>> parallelizable function calls.

On 10/22/2017 01:20 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > Wei Wang wrote: >> The balloon_lock was used to synchronize the access demand to elements >> of struct virtio_balloon and its queue operations (please see commit >> e22504296d). This prevents the concurrent run of the leak_balloon and >> fill_balloon functions, thereby resulting in a deadlock issue on OOM: >> >>

Wei Wang wrote: > >> @@ -162,20 +160,20 @@ static unsigned fill_balloon(struct virtio_balloon *vb, size_t num) > >> msleep(200); > >> break; > >> } > >> - set_page_pfns(vb, vb->pfns + vb->num_pfns, page); > >> - vb->num_pages += VIRTIO_BALLOON_PAGES_PER_PAGE; > >> + set_page_pfns(vb, pfns + num_pfns, page);

Wei Wang wrote: > >> @@ -162,20 +160,20 @@ static unsigned fill_balloon(struct virtio_balloon *vb, size_t num) > >> msleep(200); > >> break; > >> } > >> - set_page_pfns(vb, vb->pfns + vb->num_pfns, page); > >> - vb->num_pages += VIRTIO_BALLOON_PAGES_PER_PAGE; > >> + set_page_pfns(vb, pfns + num_pfns, page);

The balloon_lock was used to synchronize the access demand to elements of struct virtio_balloon and its queue operations (please see commit e22504296d). This prevents the concurrent run of the leak_balloon and fill_balloon functions, thereby resulting in a deadlock issue on OOM: fill_balloon: take balloon_lock and wait for OOM to get some memory; oom_notify: release some inflated memory via

Wei Wang wrote: > The balloon_lock was used to synchronize the access demand to elements > of struct virtio_balloon and its queue operations (please see commit > e22504296d). This prevents the concurrent run of the leak_balloon and > fill_balloon functions, thereby resulting in a deadlock issue on OOM: > > fill_balloon: take balloon_lock and wait for OOM to get some memory; >

Wei Wang wrote: > The balloon_lock was used to synchronize the access demand to elements > of struct virtio_balloon and its queue operations (please see commit > e22504296d). This prevents the concurrent run of the leak_balloon and > fill_balloon functions, thereby resulting in a deadlock issue on OOM: > > fill_balloon: take balloon_lock and wait for OOM to get some memory; >

Hi all, I was trying to find the equivalent analysis of Andersens on LLVM. I found it only on LLVM 2.6 on 'Analysis/IPA' folder. Is it removed/renamed on later versions? I'm mostly interested in 3.4 version or later. Thank you in advance, -- Irini -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, Is there a way to use LLVM to build the visual representation of program dependence graph (PDG) of a routine/program? >From looking at https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/poolalloc/branches/release_14/lib/DSA/PgmDependenceGraph.cpp, it looks like there is an incomplete implementation of PDG in LLVM. However, when I search within LLVM3.0 package, I don't find the .cpp/h code. So, I also

> On Jan 3, 2017, at 7:17 AM, Jonathan Roelofs <jonathan at codesourcery.com> wrote: > > > > On 12/31/16 12:37 PM, Fernando Magno Quintao Pereira via llvm-dev wrote: >> Dear Mehdi, >> >> I've changed your example a little bit: >> >> float saxpy(float a, float *x, float *y, int n) { >> int j = 0; >> for (int i = 0; i < n;

A new update. Same behaviour with 4.6.16. Exact issue as Bug 1249. Many thanks. Kind regards. El lun., 24 ago. 2020 a las 12:23, LPC DPG (<lpcdpg at gmail.com>) escribi?: > Dear folks. > > Was hoping it had to do with the release, but have also tested in 4.4.16 > and the issue is also there. I am aware a RHEL/CEntOS based upon 6 > distribution is not the most up to date

Interesting. Might be worth giving a try again to the idea of creating the file in anonymous memory and using a write to output it. Cheers, Rafael On 23 November 2016 at 02:41, Sean Silva via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> LLD supports

Dear Andrew. You are right, I should have taken a deeper look into the standard output during compilation. I did just assume source4 was the one for Samba4. Anyway, besides the source confusion (really, even if I had found the right one, following the code would have been out of my reach), I don't seem to find how that is related with the documentation issue, or the mput/mask/recurse

LLD supports multi-threading, and it seems to be working well as you can see in a recent result <http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=287140>. In short, LLD runs 30% faster with --threads option and more than 50% faster if you are using --build-id (your mileage may vary depending on your computer). However, I don't think most users even don't know about that

Dear all. I would like to propose a possible way to make mget and mput behave more or less the same way, rather that just changing documentation. Please, bear in mind this is a poor attempt coming from a person with no C skills at all, so other than testing that only filtered files are transferred, I have not gone further. Hope at least to have been able not to corrupt any pointer, but I'm

Hello Valery, I have some comments regarding your thoughts on LLVM support for distributed computing. Valery A.Khamenya wrote: >There should be an engine and layer for making dispatching optimizations in run-time. If one CPU is loaded and code is >"parallelizable" why then not to send some part of >calculation to other CPU? This kind of on-fly decision will >be one day

On Fri, 2019-02-15 at 15:57 +1100, Darren Tucker wrote: > That was the original intent (and it's mentioned in RFC4419) however > each moduli file we ship (70-80 instances of 6 sizes) takes about 1 > cpu-month to generate on a lowish-power x86-64 machine. Most of it > is > parallelizable, but even then it'd likely take a few hours to > generate > one of each size. I