similar to: [LLVMdev] self-modifying code and LLVM SSA form

Hi, Is decompilation possible in general to the SSA form for binaries? I assume one has to make certain assumptions about code in general to get tools like these to work. For example if code like with dlsym or jit heap allocated functions can be incorporated at runtime it would seem that in general it is quite difficult to ascertain the boundaries of a basic block and insert the correct phi

I hope you don't mind if do have a follow up question- is code in place in the code generation supporting "proper" scheduling via the processor itineraries in LLVM? On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Carter Cheng <cartercheng at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Hal. > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > >> Carter,

Thanks Hal. On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > Carter, > > In my opinion (and I was the one who committed the changes in question), > it depends on the hardware. The pipeline descriptions are for the PPC > 440, which is an embedded PPC chip use in a variety of places. As such, > it is a fairly specific target, and using

I have a basic question concerning how LLVM assigns labels to the LHS of an SSA assignment. My impression from the interface is you can pick a string which becomes the label for the result. However if you multiple labels which share the same name in a function a number gets added to the end of the label (is this correct?). In cases where you need to know what these resulting labels are is it

Hi, I'm wondering how I can convert "register allocated" code back to SSA form. I realized from MachineRegisterInfo.h that a function leaves SSA form only once and cannot be taken back to it. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140923/0124addd/attachment.html>

On 3/29/11 12:26 PM, George Baah wrote: > Hi All, > When I run the following command > llvm-gcc -03 -emit-llvm test.cpp -c -o test.bc or llvm-gcc -emit-llvm > test.cpp -c -o test.bc > > on the program test.cpp, the IR representation is not in SSA form. > I do not see any phi functions. Actually, it is in SSA form (or more precisely, the virtual registers are in SSA form;

Hello, for some my use case, I'd like to temporary break SSA property and then ask LLVM to restore it. Here's more details: if (i < 0) { i = -i; } This is a C code example. I'm trying to create a value range analysis, which will determine, that after this code, 'i' is non-negative. In SSA form, this will become i = 0; if (i < 0) { i.2 = -i; }

Hello everyone, We are working on a particular points-to analysis. The final output of that analysis should not have the LLVM SSA temporaries (like, %0, %1). My doubt is that whether we can extract the normal C variables from LLVM IR or is there any way to differentiate between SSA temporary and local C variable? For e.g. in GCC I can check whether a particular variable is an SSA temporary like,

A motivation for scheduling later is that the program representation is closer to the final instruction stream which makes the machine simulation more accurate. If you schedule too early you do not see the instructions produced by phi elimination and the two address fixup pass. LiveIntervals should work on MachineSSA form. If it doesn't you should file a bugzilla ticket with more details. -

E-path PRE requires the program in SSA form like SSAPRE algorithm. Then it finds the eliminatable path (e-path) for an expression and converts partially redundant to fully redundant and removes redundancy Chayan On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Chayan Sarkar <chayan.ju at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi

Hi, Can anyone tell me, whether it is possible to convert a program into SSA form without considering algebric equivalence ? regards, Chayan

On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Chayan Sarkar <chayan.ju at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jeffrey, > > Actually I am trying to implement "E-path PRE" which is based on > non-algebric equivallence. So, the  variable names need to be > preserved. Then why do you want to run mem2reg before your optimization in the first place? -Eli

Hi, I am a newbie to llvm. I am wondering what approach is used when coming out of SSA form. I also appreciate pointers on where to look in the source code for this phase. Best regards, Ram Ramshankar -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120824/87feb1d3/attachment.html>

Hello, I am new to LLVM. Since memory locations are not in SSA form. I was wondering if there is any attempt of transforming LLVM IR in memory SSA form? Regards Umer -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131105/3f5adb37/attachment.html>

Hi, I am interested in obtaining LLVM IR without any optimization performed on it.( IR obtained from cfrontend's AST). Is this LLVM IR in SSA form? Secondly, I want to make a transformation on this unoptimized IR, and convert it back to C. I believe llc -c does that. Thirdly, is it possible to use LLVM tool suite on LLVM IR that's not in SSA form, if we have such LLVM so.

Dear All, Could someone tell me how to convert LLVM bytecode into minimal SSA form ? or just depend on GCC frontend ? thanks aqex

You can use STOREs and LOADs on memory and then use mem2reg pass. 2010/6/1 Chayan Sarkar <chayan.ju at gmail.com>: > Hi, > > Can anyone tell me, whether it is possible to convert a program into > SSA form without considering algebric equivalence ? > > regards, > Chayan > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at

1. I am trying to get the instruction of LLVM intermediate code as a string. How can this be done? 2. Also in the SSA version of the code, how can we come to know which %N (N is any integer) is a version of some variable 'a' and which is just a temporary? Regards, Ashutosh Shukla, 10305052 M. Tech 1 Dept of Computer Science and Engg.

On 24 August 2012 02:27, Ramanarayanan, Ramshankar <Ramshankar.Ramanarayanan at amd.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > > I am a newbie to llvm. I am wondering what approach is used when coming out > of SSA form. I also appreciate pointers on where to look in the source code > for this phase. > lib/CodeGen/PHIElimination.cpp is probably what you want. > > Best regards,

> > Here's 'foo' is always called with positive value. However, the value > range > assigned to 'i' variable can be only [-inf, +inf], because uses of 'i' > outside of condition can get any value. So, I'd like to convert the > above to: > > i = 0; > if (i > 0) { > i = change_value_range(i); > foo(i); > } I