similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm-commit bounce?

Seems the last use of DIFactory in LLVM/Clang is in: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDebugInfo.cpp to get the enums llvm::DIFactory::OpDeref and llvm::DIFactory::OpPlus. Shouldn't this be moved to DIBuilder and remove the dependency completely? -- cheers, --renato http://systemcall.org/ Reclaim your digital rights, eliminate DRM, learn more at http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm

Hi all, I spend the last two weeks looking for solutions to print HTML files out of the wiki format. I tried to create a Perl hack (wasn't generic enough), a C++ parser/printer (would take too long) and looked into Deplate and some Wikimedia specific tools to convert to docbook, pdf and HTML. The last one was the most successful one (printed a nice PDF) but the XHTML was no good for Chrome

Thank you very much for you help, Renato! I read through paper you referred and also this document - http://llvm.org/docs/tutorial/JITTutorial1.html Following these instructions to create successful function I run into some problems: 1) llvm::getGlobalContext() does not exists anymore? "llvm/LLVMContext.h" too? 2) creating instance of IRBuilder don't require template (from tutorial

On 21 September 2010 17:48, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote: > In the combined llvm IR, @p3 and @p won't match as expected. Hi Devang, That's not quite what I was thinking... Maybe I explained badly... Imagine this: -- a.ll -- %struct.x = type { i32, i32 } %a = call void @func (%struct.x %b) -- b.ll -- %struct.y = type { i32, i32 } declare i32 @func (%struct.y)

I didn't know DIFactory existed until you mentioned it just now. And if folks are adding brand new classes to LLVM, can we not follow the naming conventions in the developer guidelines? On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org>wrote: > Seems the last use of DIFactory in LLVM/Clang is in: > > clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDebugInfo.cpp to get the enums

On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org>wrote: > On 26 September 2010 18:56, Nathan Jeffords <blunted2night at gmail.com> > wrote: > > The syntax for the invoke instruction is a little misleading. %x is a > value > > that is being generated by the instruction, not passed to is. It is no > > different in that regard as to

Here's a suggestion - can we make the "union patch" (the inverse of the patch that removed unions) as a downloadable file so that people who are interested in finishing the work can do so? On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org>wrote: > On 7 September 2010 15:36, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> > wrote: > >

On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org>wrote: > On 26 September 2010 20:13, Nathan Jeffords <blunted2night at gmail.com> > wrote: > > I believe the perceived problem with using eh.exception is that > > is disassociates the source of the value with the invoke instruction that > > generated it. As far as reusing the landing pad,

When compiling LLVM on my Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU P7450 running Ubuntu (gcc 4.4.5), I get this warning: /home/rengolin/workspace/llvm/rw/build/Release+Asserts/lib/libLLVMARMAsmParser.a(ARMAsmParser.o): In function `(anonymous namespace)::ARMAsmParser::ParseRegisterList(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::MCParsedAsmOperand*>&)': ARMAsmParser.cpp:(.text+0x4a05): warning: memset used with

On 21 September 2010 18:39, Andrew Lenharth <andrewl at lenharth.org> wrote: > Type names don't have meaning.  If you want this not to happen, you > can generate a different opaque type for each type in your language to > prevent merging. Hi Andrew, Why create opaque types to avoid something that should be taken from granted (in a said "type-safe" representation)? I

On 26 September 2010 20:13, Nathan Jeffords <blunted2night at gmail.com> wrote: > I believe the perceived problem with using eh.exception is that > is disassociates the source of the value with the invoke instruction that > generated it. As far as reusing the landing pad, that is still possible, it > would just require a phi node in the landing pad to bring all the different >

2009/11/5 Oleg Knut <oleg77 at gmail.com>: > Hello, > I have a simple question. How to create "dummy" function which will > have no functionality behind (return nothing and do nothing)? > Currently I'm trying to do this: > > llvm::Constant* c = Module.getOrInsertFunction("dummy", > FunctionThatNeedsToBeReplaced.getFunctionType()); >

On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org>wrote: > On 6 September 2010 01:05, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > > DISubprogram CodeGenerator::genDISubprogram(const FunctionDefn * fn, > (...) > > false /* isDefinition */, > (...) > > Hi Talin, > > The only difference from what I'm doing is that I only

On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org>wrote: > On 5 September 2010 19:32, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > > I've carefully studied the source code of CGDebugInfo in clang as a > working > > example. One puzzlement is that there's a discrepancy between what the > > "source level debugging with LLVM" docs

> Inline the init function: store 11 at the address of the "value" variable, > call printf with the string from r5. This is a bug, should have stored at an > offset of four (str r1, [r4,4]). Exactly! The IR is correct, the bug seems to be lower down. I'm no expert in the ARM back-end, though. But your report is detailed enough to help whoever is. ;) cheers, --renato

On 10 September 2010 04:47, Liu <proljc at gmail.com> wrote: > trying this: > clang -march=armv7-a -mcpu=cortex-a9 -ccc-host-triple > arm-none-linux -ccc-gcc-name arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc a.c Hi Liu, That doesn't work for me. $ clang -march=armv7-a -mcpu=cortex-a9 -ccc-host-triple arm-none-linux -ccc-gcc-name arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc alias.c clang: warning: unknown

Ok, I see it. Works for me. On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org>wrote: > On 26 September 2010 22:11, Nathan Jeffords <blunted2night at gmail.com> > wrote: > > The "exception" value will *always* be i8*, it is not possible for it to > be > > anything different. > > In the end, this a minor parser detail and it

http://llvm.org/docs/SourceLevelDebugging.html#ccxx_compile_units !1 = metadata !{ i32 524329, ;; Tag metadata !"MySource.cpp", metadata !"/Users/mine/sources", metadata !3 ;; Compile unit } !2 is the Compile Unit, right? !3 is also wrong. -- cheers, --renato http://systemcall.org/ Reclaim your digital rights, eliminate DRM, learn more at

On 7 September 2010 15:36, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > Otherwise the feature being unused will quickly became broken. It was already broken for ages... :/ Even if you're not using the backends (or MC), having it in front-end only will only confuse new users that will try to use it and hope it just works (my case, a few months ago). If there is nothing,

On 26 September 2010 22:11, Nathan Jeffords <blunted2night at gmail.com> wrote: > The "exception" value will *always* be i8*, it is not possible for it to be > anything different. > In the end, this a minor parser detail and it is not terribly important to > me one way or the other. I know, it is rather silly. It has more to do with debugging front-end code than