similar to: [LLVMdev] RFC: Enable Lit testing on Windows buildbot

Hello, Shall we enable "make check" on msys-mingw hosts? (I suggest llvm-gcc-native-mingw32-win7 could do) I expect r129122 must pass all tests on msys-mingw. (it is llvm+clang's "make check-all") Testing Time: 146.64s Expected Passes : 8297 Expected Failures : 69 Unsupported Tests : 557 Thank you, ...Takumi ps. I am using a script to kill zombie processes

Galina and Takumi, Are we ready to update the minimum required version to 2.8.12.2? -Chris > On Feb 12, 2015, at 2:35 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: > > Chandler's feedback was that we should go to 2.8.12.2 instead of 3.0 because of Ubuntu's LTS release. > > -Chris > > > > On Feb 12, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova

Hello Daniel, osuosl build master (google1) is moved to another place or just down? Thanks Galina

I'm with Takumi, and prefer to go on a safe route. Takumi, unless I'm missing something you were checking cmake 3.x with LLVM. How does it look like? Did you discover any problem? Thanks Galina On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 4:28 PM, NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com> wrote: > I missed the context. We may stand on 2.8.12.2 at first. > > I will update my cmake from

On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 17:08, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Daniel, > > osuosl build master (google1) is moved to another place or just down? >From IRC: [12:07pm] DannyB_: hi folks [12:07pm] DannyB_: for security reasons, google1 and google2 (google1 is the main llvm build master) [12:07pm] DannyB_: will be down for a few weeks [12:08pm] DannyB_:

Hello everyone, LLVM buildmaster is up and running as lab.llvm.org:8011. Daniel Berlin is working on getting the current buildslave passwords from the old buildmaster, but this may not be possible. I'd suggest changing buildslave passwords anyway, just in case. Buildslave owners, please contact me directly with your new passwords and I'll update the master as soon as I can. Thanks

google5 is up, i'm just working on copying the buildmaster config. If you want to move it to lab.llvm, that's fine too. On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > May be google1 build master cold be moved to lab.llvm.org machines? > Do anybody use it? > > Thanks > > Galina > > > > On

Hi Daniel, > I am working on it, but it may not happen until this weekend thanks a lot for working on this. Best wishes, Duncan. > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:41 AM, Duncan Sands<baldrick at free.fr> wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >>> [12:07pm] DannyB_: for security reasons, google1 and google2 (google1 >>> is the main llvm build master) >>>

Hello everyone, May be google1 build master cold be moved to lab.llvm.org machines? Do anybody use it? Thanks Galina On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 6:40 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Daniel, > >> I am working on it, but it may not happen until this weekend > > thanks a lot for working on this. > > Best wishes, Duncan. > >> >> On Wed,

These URLs don't work for me. How do I know what is broken? It builds fine on my x86 linux box. -----Original Message----- From: buildbot at google1.osuosl.org [mailto:buildbot at google1.osuosl.org] Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 5:12 PM To: Sanjiv Kumar Gupta - I00171 Cc: llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: buildbot failure in llvm on llvm-i686-linux The Buildbot has detected a new

Ah, ...no. please don't hesitate to write logs ;) It must be the subject in the buildbot, not in developer guys. Galina, I'll write up later, how to tweak this issue. It is not resolved in released versions, though. The easiest way is to tweak svnpoller. 2013/11/16 Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com>: > That would explain it. The commit messages were quite long

On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 9:18 AM, <Sanjiv.Gupta at microchip.com> wrote: > These URLs don't work for me. How do I know what is broken? > It builds fine on my x86 linux box. Why don't the URLs work for you? In this case the problem was just because llvm.org went down. When an "svn" step fails; i.e., the line after "BUILD FAILED:", the problem is usually

That would explain it. The commit messages were quite long (especially the second one) and a commit with a smaller message has shown up. Thanks for letting me know. I'll try to keep them a bit more reasonable in future. > -----Original Message----- > From: NAKAMURA Takumi [mailto:geek4civic at gmail.com] > Sent: 15 November 2013 16:28 > To: Daniel Sanders > Cc: LLVM Developers

Thanks to Daniel, we have a new home for the validator buildbot. Thanks, Daniel! Go to http://google1.osuosl.org:8080 and have a look. -Dave

On Wednesday 11 March 2009 15:47, Török Edwin wrote: > > Go to http://google1.osuosl.org:8080 and have a look. > > Looks like the x86_64 buildsbots are failing: > > /.AUTO/cray/iss.compiler/cost/tools/llvm-tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin >/../lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../../x86_64-unknown-linux- >gnu/bin/ld: >

On Aug 7, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 9:18 AM, <Sanjiv.Gupta at microchip.com> wrote: >> These URLs don't work for me. How do I know what is broken? >> It builds fine on my x86 linux box. > > Why don't the URLs work for you? > I suspect the corporate firewall is blocking outgoing connections on port 8011. -jim > In

This buildbot has been failing for a week - could we disable it? or at least move it off the main master list/stop it sending email? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <llvm.buildmaster at lab.llvm.org> Date: Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:48 PM Subject: buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-cmake-aarch64-full To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov at gmail.com>, Charles Davis

Hi Danny, Could you send me the local.cfg from the original buildmaster with the buildslave names and passwords, please? Thanks Galina On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Daniel Berlin <dannyb at google.com> wrote: > Sure, i'm fine with it :) > > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> wrote: >> Danny, >> >> lab.llvm.org

On 2009-03-06 22:18, David Greene wrote: > Thanks to Daniel, we have a new home for the validator buildbot. Thanks, > Daniel! > > Go to http://google1.osuosl.org:8080 and have a look. > Looks like the x86_64 buildsbots are failing:

Hello, A new clang builder added to osusl buildbot: http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/clang-native-arm-cortex-a9 It's pandaboard with cortex-a9 runnibg Ubuntu 11.04. It builds Ok, but few test fail and need attention. Please take a look and let me know if someone will need more information or intermediate files to fix that. Thanks Galina