similar to: [LLVMdev] Assuring ARM code quality in LLVM

Hi Renato, > I was recently investigating the build bot infrastructure and noticed > that the arm-linux target is failing for quite a long time. I believe > that it means ARM code is not executed all that often in LLVM tests, > is that correct? > > We were wondering what kind of support we could give to make sure ARM > code is correct and don't regress, specially before

On 2011-04-08 08:58, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Renato, > >> I was recently investigating the build bot infrastructure and noticed >> that the arm-linux target is failing for quite a long time. I believe >> that it means ARM code is not executed all that often in LLVM tests, >> is that correct? Hi i will summarise the last sucessfull builds by the ARM builder:

On 8 April 2011 07:58, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > there are several idle ARM buildslaves.  There are the following slaves: Hi Duncan, I could find them on the page http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/buildslaves but I couldn't tell they're ARM. Where do I get this list? Also, I believe they're testing llvm-gcc only (right?). The only target that was testing LLVM

Samba - General mailing list wrote > I would be more worried about the fact you are still using a version of > Samba that went EOL quite some time ago ;-) Thanks for the infos. This is an ARM-based (Marvell Kirkwood Feroceon 88FR131) appliance that is running Debian 7.11. "apt-get update ; apt-get upgrade" provides no more recent release of Samba. Is there a way to force APT to

These URLs don't work for me. How do I know what is broken? It builds fine on my x86 linux box. -----Original Message----- From: buildbot at google1.osuosl.org [mailto:buildbot at google1.osuosl.org] Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 5:12 PM To: Sanjiv Kumar Gupta - I00171 Cc: llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: buildbot failure in llvm on llvm-i686-linux The Buildbot has detected a new

On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 9:18 AM, <Sanjiv.Gupta at microchip.com> wrote: > These URLs don't work for me. How do I know what is broken? > It builds fine on my x86 linux box. Why don't the URLs work for you? In this case the problem was just because llvm.org went down. When an "svn" step fails; i.e., the line after "BUILD FAILED:", the problem is usually

Just received this: The Buildbot has detected a new failure of llvm-ppc-linux on llvm. Full details are available at: http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/llvm-ppc-linux/builds/3229 Buildbot URL: http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/ Buildslave for this Build: nick1 Build Reason: Build Source Stamp: 84759 Blamelist: ofv BUILD FAILED: failed compile Apparently the problem was a warning at

On Aug 7, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 9:18 AM, <Sanjiv.Gupta at microchip.com> wrote: >> These URLs don't work for me. How do I know what is broken? >> It builds fine on my x86 linux box. > > Why don't the URLs work for you? > I suspect the corporate firewall is blocking outgoing connections on port 8011. -jim > In

I set up a buildbot for llvm at http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/waterfall It builds every single revision of llvm, runs the testsuite, and reports the results. It takes about 3 minutes per build+test right now (it's an 8 core machine). Currently i have it building x86_64-linux. Setting up a builder/slave for any platform would be trivial. I simply don't have machines running anything but

I am unable to connect to build master at:google1.osuosl.org:9990 from my buildslave. See attached twisted9.0.0 log. 2010-02-12 09:50:03-0800 [-] Log opened. 2010-02-12 09:50:03-0800 [-] twistd 9.0.0 (C:\Python26\python.exe 2.6.2) starting up. 2010-02-12 09:50:03-0800 [-] reactor class: twisted.internet.win32eventreactor.Win32Reactor. 2010-02-12 09:50:03-0800 [-] Starting factory

On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Óscar Fuentes<ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> writes: > >> On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Óscar Fuentes<ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: >>> I think most LLVM users on Windows are interested on X86 only. This >>> saves a lot of time on the build process and creates smaller >>>

Hello everyone, LLVM buildmaster is up and running as lab.llvm.org:8011. Daniel Berlin is working on getting the current buildslave passwords from the old buildmaster, but this may not be possible. I'd suggest changing buildslave passwords anyway, just in case. Buildslave owners, please contact me directly with your new passwords and I'll update the master as soon as I can. Thanks

On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote: > Óscar Fuentes wrote: >> >> Just received this: >> >> The Buildbot has detected a new failure of llvm-ppc-linux on llvm. >> Full details are available at: >>  http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/llvm-ppc-linux/builds/3229 >> >> Buildbot URL:

Hey all, I have a potential project which calls for a very small form-factor computer like this: http://www.marvell.com/products/embedded_processors/developer/kirkwood/sheevaplug.jsp However, I am needing an FXS port integrated into a small footprint computer. Nothing larger than a WiFi router or gateway device, but the smaller the better, and able to run Asterisk with at least a spare USB port

Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Just received this: > > The Buildbot has detected a new failure of llvm-ppc-linux on llvm. > Full details are available at: > http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/llvm-ppc-linux/builds/3229 > > Buildbot URL: http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/ > > Buildslave for this Build: nick1 > > Build Reason: > Build Source Stamp: 84759 >

Hmmm, this used to work, at least it didn't on Aug 07 on x86_64: http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-linux-check - Daniel On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Duncan Sands<baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi John, > >> I get the error below when trying to build clang with expensive checks. >>   Works fine w/o these.  Is this a known problem? > >

> This is actually not well working yet AFAIK. I saw there is a buildbot for llvm-arm-linux on http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/one_box_per_builder How do it compile LLVM for ARM? Not using cross-compile? Regards, chenwj -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.) Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667

On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Karel Gardas <karel.gardas at centrum.cz> wrote: > Hello, > > I asked here for kind of reference GCC version which LLVM development > team is using for *native* testing on ARM hardware. (no cross > compilation!) last week or so. I've been curious myself how the > situation looks and so I tested LLVM 2.9 as a reference point and LLVM >

On 07/ 4/11 01:39 AM, Eli Friedman wrote: > For the JIT failures, it would be nice if you could track down the SVN > revision when it started failing. (We have an ARM buildbot at > http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/clang-native-arm-cortex-a9 , > but the JIT was already broken when it was set up.) I've used my i.MX53 board to get this, but I'm returning it today back to

Hello everyone, I just ordered one of these: http://www.marvell.com/products/embedded_processors/developer/kirkwood/sheevaplug.jsp Just over $110 with shipping but they are expecting the price to come down quite a bit: - 1.2Ghz ARM5 - 512MB RAM - Multiple flash storage options - Gigabit ethernet - USB 2.0 - 5 watt power usage They probably won't be shipping until late March but I