similar to: [LLVMdev] Accessing metadata & creating DIVariable

>>> I am  adding local var to existing IR with debug info. I am not using >>> the Pass infrastructure. >>> >>> void InsertDbg(AllocaInst *i, StringRef varname, Instruction, inserbefore) >>> { >>> >>> DIBuilder di(*module); >>> cu = di.createCU        / * How do I get the MDNode of  already in the >>> IR . Instead of

On Mar 29, 2011, at 8:23 AM, Vedavyas Duggirala wrote: >>>> I am adding local var to existing IR with debug info. I am not using >>>> the Pass infrastructure. >>>> >>>> void InsertDbg(AllocaInst *i, StringRef varname, Instruction, inserbefore) >>>> { >>>> >>>> DIBuilder di(*module); >>>> cu =

Hi, > You need to call di.createCompileUnit() once for your translation unit in the beginning. You don't need to keep track of CU yourself. DIBuilder will take care of it. After words, you can call di.createBasicType(..) and it will work. Actually it doesn't. But if I call di.createCompileUnit(file, dir, producer, ...) with file or dir different from that of CU already in the file,

I get the filename and directory from DISubprogram from reading llvm.dbg.sp and use that to DIBuiler::.createCompileUnit. This leads to "duplicate symbol" error from llc. >>> You need to call di.createCompileUnit() once for your translation unit in the beginning. You don't need to keep track of CU yourself. DIBuilder will take care of it. After words, you can call

On Mar 29, 2011, at 11:18 AM, Vedavyas Duggirala wrote: > Hi, > >> You need to call di.createCompileUnit() once for your translation unit in the beginning. You don't need to keep track of CU yourself. DIBuilder will take care of it. After words, you can call di.createBasicType(..) and it will work. > > Actually it doesn't. But if I call di.createCompileUnit(file, dir,

[Forgot to cc list.] Begin forwarded message: > From: Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> > Date: March 29, 2011 4:41:30 PM PDT > To: Vedavyas Duggirala <vduggira at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Accessing metadata & creating DIVariable > > > On Mar 29, 2011, at 4:29 PM, Vedavyas Duggirala wrote: > >>>> I get the filename and directory

>>> I get the filename and directory from  DISubprogram from reading >>> llvm.dbg.sp and use >>> that to DIBuiler::.createCompileUnit. This  leads to  "duplicate >>> symbol" error from llc. >> If the llvm::Module already has llvm.dbg.sp then you don't need to use DIBuilder::createCompileUnit(). The point, I am missing is how did you get

Hello all, Summary & Context: ------------------------------- I am starting to write a front-end for some domain specific programming languages. Code generation seems to be working fine. However, I am having trouble generating debug info, to be used by gdb. The problem: -------------------- I generate a foo.ll file, that is later compiled into an executable foo. The foo.ll file I

I'm trying to write a llvm pass to add debug info into a non-debug-info bitcode file. I have been read http://llvm.org/docs/SourceLevelDebugging.html. And I use DIBuilder to produce the debug metadata. I know I can't get all information form ir code . So I add some manual info as test data. After executing my pass, I can find debug info metadata in my generated bitcode. Those metadata

On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote: >> >> On Sep 22, 2009, at 4:49 PM, Talin wrote: >>> >>> // Calculate the size of the specified LLVM type. >>> Constant * DebugInfoBuilder::getSize(const Type * type) { >>>    Constant * one =

On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote: > > On Sep 22, 2009, at 4:49 PM, Talin wrote: > >> >> // Calculate the size of the specified LLVM type. >> Constant * DebugInfoBuilder::getSize(const Type * type) { >> Constant * one = ConstantInt::get(Type::Int32Ty, 1); >> return ConstantExpr::getPtrToInt( >>

On Sep 22, 2009, at 4:49 PM, Talin wrote: > > // Calculate the size of the specified LLVM type. > Constant * DebugInfoBuilder::getSize(const Type * type) { > Constant * one = ConstantInt::get(Type::Int32Ty, 1); > return ConstantExpr::getPtrToInt( > ConstantExpr::getGetElementPtr( > ConstantPointerNull::get(PointerType::getUnqual(type)), >

> On 2015-Jan-19, at 12:38, Frédéric Riss <friss at apple.com> wrote: > > >> On Jan 19, 2015, at 12:04 PM, Christian Schafmeister <chris.schaf at verizon.net> wrote: >> >> >> I forgot to mention this in my initial email. >> >> The build of LLVM that I was using was commit a0d5d7aed8e177cea381b3d054d80c212ece9f2c >> The date on the

Hi, I have a question regarding the metadata for compileunit debug info. I find a few things in it a bit strange, but maybe there it is a reason for it to be that way that I just don't understand (but if that is the case I guess the documentation needs to be clearer). Consider this C program: "int X;" Compiled with "clang -g" it debug metadata along these lines:

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org>wrote: > On 18 February 2011 21:34, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > > Sorry, I meant DIBuilder. > > DIBuilder is the new DIFactory. I've been playing with it this week > and it's much easier and straightforward to use. I'm still having > problems to create arrays, though.

I forgot to mention this in my initial email. The build of LLVM that I was using was commit a0d5d7aed8e177cea381b3d054d80c212ece9f2c The date on the commit is: Date: Fri Sep 26 12:34:06 2014 Also: Today I grabbed the ToT llvm/clang/clang-extra-tools and I’m working on getting my code to be compatible with it. I can switch back and forth between the current ToT llvm and the old one. Thanks,

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:31 AM, Jonas Maebe <jonas.maebe at elis.ugent.be>wrote: > >> >> On 01 Sep 2010, at 08:47, Talin wrote: >> >> > Once again, I have no idea what this means or how to go about >> > debugging it. >> > This is my biggest frustration with

On 18 February 2011 21:34, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry, I meant DIBuilder. DIBuilder is the new DIFactory. I've been playing with it this week and it's much easier and straightforward to use. I'm still having problems to create arrays, though. As far as I remember (from the 2010 meeting), the idea was to replace and deprecate DIFactory. I'm not saying we

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:31 AM, Jonas Maebe <jonas.maebe at elis.ugent.be>wrote: > > On 01 Sep 2010, at 08:47, Talin wrote: > > > Once again, I have no idea what this means or how to go about > > debugging it. > > This is my biggest frustration with DIFactory - there's absolutely > > no way to > > verify that the DWARF debugging information that

Sorry, I meant DIBuilder. On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > I didn't know DIFactory existed until you mentioned it just now. > > And if folks are adding brand new classes to LLVM, can we not follow the > naming conventions in the developer guidelines? > > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Renato Golin <rengolin at