similar to: [LLVMdev] GSOC proposal submission

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Xin Tong Utoronto <x.tong at utoronto.ca>wrote: > How do I submit my GSOC proposal to the llvmdev mailing list ? > Posting your proposal to the mailing list is just to get feedback *before* submitting it (which is very much recommended). To actually submit your proposal, you need to register on the Google Summer of Code website and submit it there.

GSOC application deadline is approaching fast. I just want to make sure I submitted all the required documents for the application. 1. I submitted my application on the http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2011 page 2. I posted my application here (<llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>) and had quite a few comments and suggestions Anything else I need to do ? -- Kind Regards Xin

*Project Description:* * * LLVM has gained much popularity in the programming languages and compiler industry from the time it is developed. Lots of researchers have used LLVM as frameworks for their researches and many languages have been ported to LLVM IR and interpreted, Just-in-Time compiled or statically compiled to native code. One of the current drawbacks of the LLVM JIT is the lack of an

I understand that we need to push the address to a register then branch using the register. But i am asking why there is a trampoline there such that a call to foo is first branched to an snippet and the snippet branches to the X86CompilationCallback. is this snippet necessary ? Thanks Xin On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Reid Kleckner <reid.kleckner at gmail.com>wrote: > The

I have a question on the LLVM JIT I did some brief memory reading one day and I found that a call to a non-library function is resolved by the X86CompilationCallback, but the X86CompilationCallback is reached through a trampoline. why can not the generated code jump to the X86CompilationCallback function directly ? 0x2b0a6a4d103b: mov $0x2b0a6a561010,%rax 0x2b0a6a4d1045:

On 29 March 2011 12:35, Xin Tong Utoronto <x.tong at utoronto.ca> wrote: > *Project Description:* > > * > * > > LLVM has gained much popularity in the programming languages and compiler > industry from the time it is developed. Lots of researchers have used LLVM > as frameworks for their researches and many languages have been ported to > LLVM IR and interpreted,

The address of the callee may be more than 2 GB away in memory, which cannot be encoded as an immediate offset in the call instruction. So, the value is first materialized with a mov instruction which can encode the immediate and then jumped to through a register. Reid On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Xin Tong Utoronto <x.tong at utoronto.ca> wrote: > I have a question on the LLVM JIT

I would like to know the status of the autovectorization support in LLVM. does LLVM have a loop dependence analysis, does LLVM have a infrastructure for autovectorization ? etc. Kind Regards Xin Tong -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110624/3dc35318/attachment.html>

Do any of you have an idea as to what the Compilation Time vs Execution Time looks like in LLVM JIT with most aggressive optimizations on. Is adaptive compilation going to bring any benefits to the LLVM JIT ? -- Kind Regards Xin Tong -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, guys I am Wenjin from Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Science, pursing a master degree and my current research interests including using Data mining and Information retrieve technology to analysis software engineering (SE) data and support SE. I have great interested in "Weight Schemes" project. and in the last few days I have learnt some detail about DFR model family by

We've decided to apply for Google's Summer of Code this year - for background info on the programme see: http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/program/home/google/gsoc2011 We applied last year, and while we didn't get a place, the feedback was positive and we were encouraged to apply again this year. I'm happy to act as admin (which I've done for SWIG in the past, so I know

On 24 June 2011 21:13, Xin Tong Utoronto <x.tong at utoronto.ca> wrote: > I would like to know the status of the autovectorization support in LLVM. >  does LLVM have a loop dependence analysis, does LLVM have a infrastructure > for autovectorization ? etc. Not yet, but it's getting there... http://polly.grosser.es/ cheers, --renato

On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> wrote: > > On Apr 1, 2011, at 9:38 AM, Reid Kleckner wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> Then we would always have the location of the br B instruction in A, as > it is pushed

To Whom It May Concern: My name is Daniel DaCosta. I am a first year PhD Student at the University of Minnesota. I am working with the Programming Languages group at UMN. I am interested in type theory and logic based languages, including both practical and theoretical applications. I am inquiring about a proposal that would involve either toolchain extensions or proof of concept implementation

Should not the 4.0.0 release be March _2017_ in the "Release Emails" section on http://llvm.org/ ? -Xin

I do not know too much about clang, is opencl publicly supported in clang ? how about cuda ? Thanks Xin

but does it have default values ? Thanks Xin On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:19 AM, Che-Liang Chiou <clchiou at gmail.com> wrote: > You specify shader model, bit size and etc. arch-specified parameters > though -march, -mattr and -mcpu, but AFAIK, PTX backend does not use > the GPU thread/block/grid size information in optimization yet. > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Xin

Hello I am trying to enable globalsmodref-aa by default. globalmodref-aa is a ModulePass and therefore can be invalidated and need to be rerun. I see globalsmodref-aa is enabled in LTO passmanager by adding the analysis pass explicitly. I wonder whether globalsmodref-aa can be enabled/run based on pass dependencies, i.e. those indicated in getAnalysisUsage(). Thanks, Xin -------------- next

I have a function address held in an uint64_t. I would like to cast the function address to a function prototype and create a call to the function in LLVM. How could I do this ? Thanks Xin

If I turn on one of the llvm interprocedural optimizations without turning on the analysis it uses. will the analysis be turned on automatically ? Thanks Xin