similar to: [LLVMdev] Small improvements to llvm demo page (Bug 1440)

This concerns me as well. I've accepted a programming bounty to port LLVM to AROS x86. Once that's done I suspect many people will want it ported to the other processors AROS supports. ----- Original Message ---- > From: Bjarke Walling <bjarke.walling at gmail.com> > To: cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu > Sent: Sat, April 9, 2011 2:06:30 PM > Subject: [cfe-dev] Adding new

Hi Bjarke, Bjarke Walling wrote: > I see. So you check this value stored in a thread-local variable after > each call? And you lower invoke to a call and branch with regard to > this value? > Yes, that's correct. > What are these sophisticated techniques you are talking about? My time > frame for implementing this is, not unlimited, but fairly long. Less > than a

Hi, I want to support the unwind instruction on x86. Specifically I want to: * Provide an efficient runtime implementation that does not depend on reading the DWARF EH information. * It should be self hosted, meaning the runtime is static linked in. I want to use it kernel mode. * Unwinding should be a read-only operation regarding the stack, so I can create a stack dump in the

Hi Nicolas, On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Nicolas Geoffray <nicolas.geoffray at lip6.fr> wrote: > > Duncan Sands wrote: >> >> Another possibility, very close you yours and currently used by the vmkit >> project, is to modify all functions so they return two values, the usual >> return value and an additional boolean value indicating whether an >>

Hi Bjarke, > * Provide an efficient runtime implementation that does not > depend on reading the DWARF EH information. why? The DWARF EH info encodes two things: (1) how to restore registers; and (2) matching rules for exception objects, and what to do with them. You will need something along the lines of (1) if you unwind out of the middle of functions. As for (2), if you

Bjarke Walling wrote: > Another option I'm thinking about is creating a runtime that, when > initialized, compiles the DWARF information to native code. It could > create an Instruction Pointer lookup hash table associated with unwind > actions. JIT-compiling the unwinder data, yes. Given that the unwinder data is, basically, the source for a specialized bytecode interpreter I

Hi Andrew, On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com> wrote: > JIT-compiling the unwinder data, yes. Given that the unwinder data > is, basically, the source for a specialized bytecode interpreter I > can't see any reason this wouldn't work. I might look into that. It will be a good challenge to understand the EH data in detail and program my own

Applying the following patches closes the following task (part 1 was already taken care of). TASK: New Problems STATUS: Open FROM: <Kurt.Hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at> New minor remarks: * The documentation for `image' still has the old order z, x, y. * Perhaps one should add `par(ask = T)' in the image demo? * Perhaps one should save the original value

The demo page is up, but when I click on "Compile source code" I get: Not Found The requested URL /demo/test.cgi was not found on this server. Ciao, Duncan.

> > The demo page is up, but when I click on "Compile source code" I get: > > Not Found > > The requested URL /demo/test.cgi was not found on this server. > Weird - I noticed this bug a few weeks ago. I assume Tanya must've left some local/test changes in when she was updating the patch with my color diagnostic changes a few weeks ago. The test.cgi was up on

Hello all, I was playing with the demo and found that I couldn't use any c++11: warning: 'noexcept' is a keyword in C++11 [-Wc++11-compat] I was wondering if the demo will be updated to LLVM/Clang 3.2 once that finishes, and if it would be possible to enable c++11 support. Thanks, -Stephen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Blind Faith <person.of.book at gmail.com> writes: > I used the LLVM demo page http://llvm.org/demo/ to generate C++ code for > generating LLVM IR code. But that page is now disabled. Is there any tool > or other site which does what I'm trying to do, that is I give "C/C++ code" > as input and I get the "C++ code for generating the equivalent LLVM IR" as

Will this one help? http://ellcc.org/demo/index.cgi Cheers, Nico On Feb 14, 2013, at 11:31 PM, Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Feb 7, 2013, at 6:26 PM, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 11:09:10AM +0100, Óscar Fuentes wrote: >>> Blind Faith <person.of.book at gmail.com> writes:

I used the LLVM demo page http://llvm.org/demo/ to generate C++ code for generating LLVM IR code. But that page is now disabled. Is there any tool or other site which does what I'm trying to do, that is I give "C/C++ code" as input and I get the "C++ code for generating the equivalent LLVM IR" as output. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Hi, This isn't that new anymore, but I'd let everyone know that CELT 0.10.0 is out. We've improved the quality quite a bit since the last release and we fixed many bugs. For this release, Monty has written an extensive demo page at: http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/celt/demo.html Although it's not final yet, it contains a lot of information of CELT, recent changes and

Hi Bitter Melon! If it's not too much trouble, could you add a check box to the LLVM demo page to pass the -fnested-functions option to llvm-gcc? I'm interested in studying how nested functions are implemented, but haven't yet been able to get llvm-gcc built on my own system. Thanks! Eric

The LLVM demo page is currently disabled. I will notify the list if/when it gets re-enabled. Thanks, Tanya

Hi Eric, > If it's not too much trouble, could you add a check box to the LLVM demo > page to pass the -fnested-functions option to llvm-gcc? I'm interested > in studying how nested functions are implemented, but haven't yet been > able to get llvm-gcc built on my own system. I turned it on unconditionally. Meow! Bitter Melon.

> The demo page is up, but when I click on "Compile source code" I get: >> >> Not Found >> >> The requested URL /demo/test.cgi was not found on this server. >> > > Weird - I noticed this bug a few weeks ago. I assume Tanya must've left > some local/test changes in when she was updating the patch with my color > diagnostic changes a few

Is that the reason for the down-time? Damn people running their compile jobs on llvm.org... :) On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > The LLVM demo page is currently disabled. I will notify the list if/when > it gets re-enabled. > > Thanks, > Tanya > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list