Displaying 20 results from an estimated 11000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Alternative to Adding New Intrinsics for Code-Generation?"
2011 Mar 10
0
[LLVMdev] Alternative to Adding New Intrinsics for Code-Generation?
On Mar 10, 2011, at 10:43 AM, Dan Bailey wrote:
> I've written an IR->IR translation as part of a high-level language I've
> designed. It replaces my own specific functions in LLVM passes with
> custom logic.
>
> As part of the process, it needs to perform constant propagation and
> inlining prior to doing any translation. Initially I just used simple
>
2011 Mar 10
2
[LLVMdev] Alternative to Adding New Intrinsics for Code-Generation?
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
John McCall wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:FAB334D8-72D0-40FB-B133-A9430870B701@apple.com"
2011 Mar 10
0
[LLVMdev] Alternative to Adding New Intrinsics for Code-Generation?
On Mar 10, 2011, at 11:11 AM, Dan Bailey wrote:
> John McCall wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 10, 2011, at 10:43 AM, Dan Bailey wrote:
>>
>>> I've written an IR->IR translation as part of a high-level language I've
>>> designed. It replaces my own specific functions in LLVM passes with
>>> custom logic.
>>>
>>> As part of the
2011 May 13
2
[LLVMdev] [ptx] Propose a register class naming convention change
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 5:11 AM, Dan Bailey <drb at dneg.com> wrote:
> That's fine with me. Unless there's a particular reason for it I would
> suggest perhaps changing the immediate syntax as well to swap it round, so
> it would be Immi32, Immi64, Immf32, etc. It doesn't bother me that much the
> way it currently is, but when there are lots of operations taking a
2012 May 01
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH][RFC] NVPTX Backend
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Bailey [mailto:dan at dneg.com]
> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2012 8:46 AM
> To: Justin Holewinski
> Cc: Jim Grosbach; llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu; Vinod Grover;
> llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> Subject: Re: [llvm-commits] [PATCH][RFC] NVPTX Backend
>
> Justin,
>
> Firstly, this is great! It seems to be so much further forward in
2011 Jul 29
2
[LLVMdev] Proposal for better assertions in LLVM
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
> On Jul 28, 2011, at 12:07 PM, Talin wrote:
>
> Because the stream is a raw_ostream, LLVM types and values can easily be
>> printed to the stream without having to convert them to string form.
>>
>>
>> I'm unconvinced that this is worth it at all. This is only going to allow
2012 May 02
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH][RFC] NVPTX Backend
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Justin Holewinski wrote:
<blockquote
2011 May 13
0
[LLVMdev] [ptx] Propose a register class naming convention change
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Justin Holewinski wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:BANLkTi=Y9EFmWRu-9dQxydq8zTyF7tEbJw@mail.gmail.com"
2010 Mar 02
11
Expand zpool capacity
Hello, Experts.
I''ve got a problem. I''m trying to expand my main zpool (rpool), but don''t know how to do that. (i''m 100% newbie in non-windows world)
I use Osol under Vmware on Windows.
I had a pretty small vhdd -> only 12gb. Yesterday i decided to expand my virtual drive to 20gb. (After several tries to upgrade the OS to a newest dev-releases and
2019 Jan 15
3
MySQL 8.0: Supported?
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>
Any way you could check config.log ?
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Aki
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
On 15 January 2019 at 22:32 Larry Rosenman <
<a
2019 Jan 15
2
MySQL 8.0: Supported?
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>
https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/mysql-init.html does not support intentional removal of mysql_init
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Aki
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
2019 Feb 05
4
Release notify (2.2.36.1 and 2.3.4.1)
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:18:45PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington via dovecot wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 20:32, Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Due to DMARC issues some people have failed to receive the latest security
> > information, so here it is repeated for both releases:
> >
> > 2.3.4.1
> >
> >
2019 Feb 05
4
Release notify (2.2.36.1 and 2.3.4.1)
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:18:45PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington via dovecot wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 20:32, Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Due to DMARC issues some people have failed to receive the latest security
> > information, so here it is repeated for both releases:
> >
> > 2.3.4.1
> >
> >
2006 Oct 25
2
[LLVMdev] Some basic questions about LLVM version 1.8 bytecode format
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
I generated LLVM bytecode for a "hello world!" program just to get the
basic bytecode structure. I have
2019 Jan 15
2
MySQL 8.0: Supported?
It appears the issue is MySQL 8.0.13 apparently(?) removed the mysql_init
symbol.
poudriere logs:
http://home.lerctr.org:8888/jail.html?mastername=p120amd64-host-ports
the first build is 8.0.12, the 2nd is 8.0.13.
Can the dovecot guys look as well? I've sent a note to the MySQL
maintainer for FreeBSD as well.
Thanks.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 1:15 AM Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo at
2006 Oct 26
0
[LLVMdev] Some basic questions about LLVM version 1.8 bytecode format
Hi Robert,
On Wed, 2006-10-25 at 16:00 -0600, Robert Mykland wrote:
> I generated LLVM bytecode for a "hello world!" program just to get the
> basic bytecode structure. I have a few questions about the global
> info module and the global constants module where there have
> apparently been changes since 1.4.
Okay.
> I would be happy to collect these differences and do
2018 Nov 24
2
v2.3.4 released
On Sat, 24 Nov 2018 at 10:56, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote:
>
> > On 23 November 2018 at 17:46 Brad Smith <brad at comstyle.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 11/23/2018 9:39 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 at 17:30, The Doctor <doctor at doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
> > >
2011 Jul 29
0
[LLVMdev] Proposal for better assertions in LLVM
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Talin wrote:
<blockquote
2017 Jun 21
2
AVX 512 Assembly Code Generation issues
when i generate code with 72 loop iterations.
the compiler generates code with using avx512 zmm operations 4 times
(16x4=64) and remaining 8 iterations are handled by routine mov operations
with EAX register. wouldn't it be better if it uses ymm for remaining 8
iterations as it does when iteration count is between 8 and 15. same for
xmm and so on.
please correct me if i am wrong.
Thank
2019 Dec 08
2
bash script hook lda_mailbox_autocreate for generate mail-crypt user encrypted private key with user password
> Technically creating and encrypting folder key does not
> require decrypting user's private key. All folder keys
> are encrypted with user's public key.
Problem is for that this is a new user. The new user has no private key. I
need for generating that private key. It do not the sense encrypts
something using a key public if there is no private key. Both key public
and private