similar to: [LLVMdev] Writing a compiler to use LLVM for code generation

On May 19, 2009, at 12:32 AM, Nick Lewycky wrote: > Chris Lattner wrote: >> FYI, I wrote up some thoughts on this here: >> http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/MemoryUseMarkers.txt >> >> The intention is to allow front-ends to express things like "I know >> this memory is a constant in this region" and to allow the optimizer/ >> codegen to perform

On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > FYI, I wrote up some thoughts on this here: > http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/MemoryUseMarkers.txt > > The intention is to allow front-ends to express things like "I know > this memory is a constant in this region" and to allow the optimizer/ > codegen to perform more aggressive

FYI, I wrote up some thoughts on this here: http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/MemoryUseMarkers.txt The intention is to allow front-ends to express things like "I know this memory is a constant in this region" and to allow the optimizer/ codegen to perform more aggressive stack slot merging. -Chris

Chris Lattner wrote: > FYI, I wrote up some thoughts on this here: > http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/MemoryUseMarkers.txt > > The intention is to allow front-ends to express things like "I know > this memory is a constant in this region" and to allow the optimizer/ > codegen to perform more aggressive stack slot merging. Very nice! Why does @llvm.invariant.end

Chris Lattner wrote: > On May 19, 2009, at 12:32 AM, Nick Lewycky wrote: > >> Chris Lattner wrote: >>> FYI, I wrote up some thoughts on this here: >>> http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/MemoryUseMarkers.txt >>> >>> The intention is to allow front-ends to express things like "I know >>> this memory is a constant in this region" and

On Aug 17, 2011, at 5:02 AM, Matthieu Monrocq wrote: > My surprise stems from the fact that Clang/LLVM seems to reserve (at least in its bytecode) space for all temporary variables, not taking into account that some are mutually exclusive. I would have expected the space to be folded. However, since this is LLVM IR, and not the final assembly, and since LLVM IR is strongly typed, it makes

On 24/01/2012, at 20:39, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Jan 23, 2012, at 4:22 AM, Roman Leshchinskiy wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> For the Glasgow Haskell Compiler's backend, we would like to let LLVM know >> that certain loads are safe to execute speculatively and hence to hoist >> out of loops. At the moment, there doesn't seem to be a mechanism for >>

On Jan 23, 2012, at 4:22 AM, Roman Leshchinskiy wrote: > Hello, > > For the Glasgow Haskell Compiler's backend, we would like to let LLVM know > that certain loads are safe to execute speculatively and hence to hoist > out of loops. At the moment, there doesn't seem to be a mechanism for > doing so. There seem to be two ways of implementing this: either allow >

On May 19, 2009, at 7:58 PM, Nick Lewycky wrote: > Chris Lattner wrote: >> On May 19, 2009, at 12:32 AM, Nick Lewycky wrote: >> >>> Chris Lattner wrote: >>>> FYI, I wrote up some thoughts on this here: >>>> http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/MemoryUseMarkers.txt >>>> >>>> The intention is to allow front-ends to express things

On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Darby Vicker <darby.vicker at gmail.com> wrote: > On Saturday, December 20, 2014, Darby Vicker <darby.vicker at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I thought about trying centos 7. But in the end that doesn't really >> help me since I'm trying to keep my current centos 6 installation >> working. I don't really have the

Chris Lattner wrote: > On May 19, 2009, at 7:58 PM, Nick Lewycky wrote: > >> Chris Lattner wrote: >>> On May 19, 2009, at 12:32 AM, Nick Lewycky wrote: >>> >>>> Chris Lattner wrote: >>>>> FYI, I wrote up some thoughts on this here: >>>>> http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/MemoryUseMarkers.txt >>>>>

On Saturday, December 20, 2014, Darby Vicker <darby.vicker at gmail.com> wrote: > I thought about trying centos 7. But in the end that doesn't really > help me since I'm trying to keep my current centos 6 installation > working. I don't really have the time/energy to reinstall everyting > under CentOS 7 right now. > > I was able to get a 6.6 LiveCD built

I sent this last night but it didn't show up in the archives. Trying again without the attachment. Are messages with attachments blocked on this list? On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 11:50 PM, Darby Vicker <darby.vicker at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks a ton for the suggestions and info everyone. > >> Two things I think you should consider doing... >> 1) in your next post (and

On 1/5/2015 9:24 PM, Darby Vicker wrote: > He is suggesting I get in touch with the people who maintain the > CentOS kernel. that would be Red Hat, unless you're talking about the CentOS Plus kernel.... -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast

Hello. I'm following the instructions on how to install Civ 4 on my Ubuntu system. I've had it working perfectly in the past, but this time I come to a stop every time I try to patch to 1.74. The patch installer doesn't recognise that I have an existing installation of Civ on my system. Sorry to be a pain in the arse, but I can't remember if this happened before and if it did how

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig5A700CC15DEABD01445A1B70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I have modified the code originally posted to include capability for arbitrary weightings for the rows and columns (which apply in the nominal-ordinal and the ordinal-ordinal cases). The code is pasted

I''m returning some rows from a tags database that look like this: ID WORDS 1. apple banana pear 2. banana melon 3. apple peach lime What I want to do with that data is use the .split method to divide them into separate values in an array, then use the .uniq method to return a unique list of the words like so: apple, banana, pear, melon, peach, lime So in my controller I

I have a very strange problem, which no one has been able to fathom to this point so I'm hoping that someone here may have encountered something similar. I'd better note down some background details first. Relevant machines involved: Win2K Adv. Server SP3 (acting as Active Directory primary) Win2K Pro SP3 (authenticates against Win2K server above) WinXP Pro SP1 (authenticates against

It seems to me that the RSpec bundle''s ''it'' snippet is in need of some love. By default, a newly inserted spec passes. This seems odd as it is misleading. It also makes it harder find what specs still need to be completed if you return to an RSpec module after a break. I propose that the ''it'' snippet is changed to the following: it

Hey. Below is a patch to allow generic Ajax.Autocompleters. Basically it''s for people who wanna be able to watch an input for changes, but don''t want it to pop up an autocompleter box below. Useful for live previews, that kind of thing. Someone''s gonna have to fix the tabstops. I couldn''t be arse to work out how to make vim do the softtabs properly. Spaces for