similar to: [LLVMdev] Unnamed structure types

Hi, is there a problem with loadable backends and some analysis passes? An example: If I put the C backend in my project directory, compile a library form the code, and try to load it into lli I get the following message: ------------------------------------------------------- lli -load /path/CBackend.dylib Error opening '/path/CBackend.dylib': dlopen(/path/CBackend.dylib, 1):

Hi > Right it does. However, does something *else* require MParSchedule? If > so, what? Ok, i am writing on a different backend based on the cbackend. The test usage of this pass looks like this: void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { AU.addRequired<LoopInfo>(); AU.addRequired<MParSchedule>(); AU.setPreservesAll(); } and then in the

Update: the "unnamed pass" is PostDominatorTree. My module pass requires PDT (specified in its getAnalysisUsage). When it visits a function, it calls getAnalysis<PostDominatorTree>(), which triggers the failed assertion "getAnalysis*() called on an analysis that was not 'required' by pass!" This issue has been addressed on this mailing list, but it seems the

Solved... For the record, there were two issues: 1) I was not passing the Function to getAnalysis for the PDT. 2) I was attempting to getAnalysis on external functions. On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Scott Ricketts<sricketts at maxentric.com> wrote: > Update: the "unnamed pass" is PostDominatorTree. My module pass > requires PDT (specified in its getAnalysisUsage). When it

Dear John, thanks! I was irritated by the path of the header file/declaration. It is not like the definition in a subdirectory. Sorry my fault. Is there an overview where classes and link options are mapped to each other? Kind regards, Nico On Jan 4, 2009, at 4:07 PM, John Criswell wrote: > Dear Nico, > > I believe you need to add LLVMipa to the list of libraries to link >

Dear Nico, I believe you need to add LLVMipa to the list of libraries to link into your tool. FindUsedTypes::ID is defined in lib/Analysis/IPA. I think it would be LLVMipa.a if you added it to LLVMLIBS and ipa if you added it to LINK_COMPONENTS. -- John T. Nico wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to implement an 'llc'-like tool in my project to manage > different passes and a

I have written a module pass. When I use the debug pass structure option, the name of my module pass is printed but then I get "Unnamed pass" when the FunctionPassManagerImpl *FPP calls dumpPassStructure (in PassManager.cpp). Is this the expected behavior, or should I be concerned that there is an error in my approach? Thanks, Scott

Hi,all I ran my generated whole-program bitcode file which performs as a bodytrack tool, it can give me the right result but with a stack dump before it exsits Update Error : Model observation failed for time : 1 Error loading observation data terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::bad_cast' what(): std::bad_cast 0 lli 0x08b713d2 1 lli 0x08b71247

Why this log? Debian Lenny 5.0.4 Samba with PDC tailf -f /var/log/samna/log.nmbd tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/run/samba/unexpected.tdb (65025,49187) is already open in this process [2010/05/12 09:57:36, 1] lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_log(682) tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/run/samba/unexpected.tdb (65025,49187) is already open in this process [2010/05/12 09:57:36, 1] lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_log(682)

Please, What's this? Please, please, how to resolve ? [root@neosaldina-lj003 samba]# more nmbd.log tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/cache/samba/unexpected.tdb (835,457947) is alr eady open in this process [2005/08/04 00:12:51, 2] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(725) tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/cache/samba/unexpected.tdb (835,457947) is alr eady open in this process [2005/08/04

Some times I have in log : [2004/02/04 12:00:06, 5] lib/gencache.c:gencache_init(59) Opening cache file at /var/lock/samba/gencache.tdb [2004/02/04 12:00:06, 5] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(724) tdb(unnamed): tdb_brlock failed (fd=12) at offset 4 rw_type=1 lck_type=13: Ressource temporairement non disponible [2004/02/04 12:00:06, 5] libsmb/namecache.c:namecache_enable(58) namecache_enable:

Hi, I tried to implement an 'llc'-like tool in my project to manage different passes and a target machine. I use given llvm project structure to avoid problems but I have a link problem and don't know how to solve it: The target machine uses 'FindUsedTypes' pass and when I try to use my target machine in the tool I got "Undefined symbols:

Hi, I'm trying to recover the inheritance relations for a class type (so a list of base classes) from a llvm ir file generated via compiling some cpp file using clang. I have access to the TypeSymbolTable and have found the class type I want to know the base classes for in the table. How do I go about extracting this (debug) information? I'm stuck here: if(StructType*

Hi, Recently I came across some IR produced by a frontend that had unnamed function arguments. For example something like this. ``` define i32 @foo(i32, i32, i32) #0 { %x = add i32 %1, %2 ret i32 %x } ``` I had never seen this before, so I took a look at the LLVM language reference manual and the section on functions [1] doesn't say anything about what "argument list" can be

Hi, On 09/04/13 10:16, Dong Chen wrote: > hello guys: > I am in trouble with get the identifies of the unnamed temporaries from the > instruction of LLVM IR. this is a FAQ. Most names in the IR are just there to make it easier to read and can safely be removed. You can't rely on instructions having names, and as you saw often they do not have a name. Even if they start off with a

hi, Duncan Sands: thanks for your reply old friend. the reason why I want to get the unnamed value is that I am doing some analysis based on the IR code. And IR is in the form of SSA(static single assignment). so i need to get the operands of each instructions including a lot of instructions like this (%4 = mul nsw i32 %1, %width). the unnamed values are the connection of instructions, if i

On 13 August 2014 15:48, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: >> The above LLVM IR was confusing to me because I usually see that >> unnamed registers start counting from 1 (i.e. %1 = add ...). > > There's a (usually hidden) %0 representing the entry basic block > there. The general rule is "start from 0 and keep counting; skip named >

hello guys: I am in trouble with get the identifies of the unnamed temporaries from the instruction of LLVM IR. for example: instruction: %4 = mul nsw i32 %1, %width unnamed temporaries: %4, %1 how to get them? I have tried several iterators(op_iterator,value_op_iterator) and getOperand(int) function,but none of them works. does anyone know how to get it? thanks very much -- View this message

Hi Nan Zhu, > I use Bugpoint to check it , Bugpoint gives me the following information: > > > Read input file : 'bodytrack.bc' > *** All input ok > Initializing execution environment: Found gcc: /usr/lib/ccache/gcc > Running the code generator to test for a crash: <cbe>*** Debugging code > generator crash! > > Error running tool: >

> I did mean the LangRef, but probably not there, and not to that degree. For documentation I think being explicit is much better than being implicit. > It's a fairly minor point, perhaps warranting a sentence where unnamed > values are generally discussed and the basic-block case is mentioned > (under the "Identifiers" section). I took a look at the