similar to: [LLVMdev] matching function call arguments

Could you be more precise about what you mean by "identical"? Would entry(2) and entry(1+1) be considered equivalent? If the same Value* is passed to entry and exit, then pointer equality (==) will detect that. Reid On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Hari Pyla <harip at vt.edu> wrote: > Hi, >  I am trying to identify if two functions were called with exactly the same

Hi Reid, Thank you for your response. In my analysis, I will always have entry(2) and exit(2). I will not run into cases involving entry (1+1) or entry (fn return values). I am having trouble trying to compare the arguments of entry and exit in the following scenario. #include<stdio.h> #include<stdlib.h> #include<pthread.h> struct sa { int a; pthread_mutex_t *mutex1;

On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Hari Pyla <harip at vt.edu> wrote: >  Thank you for your response. In my analysis, I will always have > entry(2) and exit(2). I will not run into cases involving entry (1+1) or > entry (fn return values). I am having trouble trying to compare the > arguments of entry and exit in the following scenario. > > #include<stdio.h> >

Hi, I am instrumenting the stores in a program by inserting a function call (store_prologue) before every store instruction in the IR file. I set the prologue function's attribute to "AlwaysInline" using addFnAttr(). In the program the prologue function is defined as static inline. I am using opt to generate an optimized (inline the calls to the store prologue) using the

If I understand correctly, you're saying that the C source definition of the prologue function is declared as static. If you compile that function to LLVM IR, it will get interal linkage and will not be visible to functions in other compilation units; instead, it will get renamed if there is a function defined with the same name. As such, it will never get inlined as the instrumented code

Hi, I am trying to migrate a VM from one node to another and I get the following error message. [user at n0 ~]$ virsh --c qemu:///system migrate --verbose Fedora-17-x86_64-1 qemu+ssh://n1/system error: XML error: missing security model when using multiple labels On both the src and dest nodes, I've disabled SELinux and I have the following libvirt version installed $virsh --connect

Hi I am trying to register shadow a global variable using -ffixed option in llvm-gcc. I am able to accomplish this using gcc however llvm-gcc seems to ignore this option and generate code using the register. command line: >gcc -Wall -m64 -O3 -pthread -ftls-model=initial-exec -ffixed-r12 test.c -o test >objdump -d ./test | grep r12 >llvm-gcc -Wall -m64 -O3 -pthread

[outgoing-fax] exten => _0XXXXXXXXX,1,SetVar(NumberCalled=${EXTEN}) exten => _0XXXXXXXXX,2,Wait(10) exten => fax,1,SetCallerid(${FAX_CALLERID}) exten => fax,2,Dial(Zap/g1/${NumberCalled},60) exten => fax,3,Hangup exten => t,1,Busy exten => i,1,Busy -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com]

i am not able to join the domain using ads and target ip ( net ads join ?S <domain controller ip> ?U <username> ). I am getting below error. *net ads join -S 172.17.100.97 -U administrator* *Enter administrator's password:* *kinit succeeded but ads_sasl_spnego_krb5_bind failed: Server not found in Kerberos database* *Failed to join domain: failed to connect to AD: Server not found

Hi, I am using the autocomplete for text field with ''Scriptaculous'' and it works perfectly fine in "new" action. All the examples I see are only for the "new" action. But doesn''t default to the selected value/text in "edit/show" action? Is this possible or should I write custom code for "edit/show" action? Thanks, Hari --

Hi all. I have a function that I would like to use either the argument name as originally defined or another name. Within the function (and other functions) use the argument name as originally written, so I don't want to simply remove the old argument name for the new one, but simply allow the function to treat both argument names as equivalent. Here is an example: foo <-

Hi, What is the best way to parse HTML? Or is there a simple way to convert a table to an array? I tried beautiful_soup and the built-in htmltools, but have trouble getting them to run. Any pointers? Thanks, Hari -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi, If it was just reads then the tier daemon won't migrate the files to hot tier. If you create a file or write to a file that file will be made available on the hot tier. On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> wrote: > Milind and Hari, > > Can you please take a look at this? > > Thanks, > Nithya > > On 31 July 2017 at

Hi, Before you try turning off the perf translators can you send us the following, So we will make sure that the other things haven't gone wrong. can you send us the log files for tier (would be better if you attach other logs too), the version of gluster you are using, the client, and the output for: gluster v info gluster v get v1 performance.io-cache gluster v get v1

Hi, I am using the ''acts_as_taggable'' gem and have issues when I try to ''tag'' an entity with a ''tagname'' already defined. i.e 1) book[1].tag(''science'',''paperback'') --> works fine 2) book[2].tag(''roman'',''physics'',''paperback'') --> creates an

Dear R community, I am struggling a bit with a probably fairly simple task. I need to use some already existing functions as argument for a new function that I am going to create. 'dataset' is an argument, and it comprises objects named 'mean_test', 'sd_test', 'kurt_test' and so on. 'arg1' tells what object I want (mean, sd, kurt) while 'arg2' tells

There's more that can be done (in particular, use of CLEANUP_FREE), but this is enough to at least see if I'm on the right track. I couldn't figure out an obvious difference between common/include and common/utils, but it looks like the former is for things that are inlineable via .h only, while the latter is when you need to link in a convenience library, so this landed in the

Hi, How do I associate two different tables which have a lookup id (table) as common. I tried the has_many :table2, :through => look_up_table in my table1 model. Any hints? Thanks, Hari -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

For the tier daemon to migrate the files for read, few performance translators have to be turned off. By default the performance quick-read and io-cache are turned on. You can turn them off so that the files will be migrated for read. On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Hari Gowtham <hgowtham at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > If it was just reads then the tier daemon won't migrate

Hi, How can I add a GlobalVariable with type pthread_mutex_t into one module? Thanks, Guoliang