similar to: [LLVMdev] Announcing: LLVM 2.9 Tentative Release Schedule

----- Original Message ---- > From: Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> > To: Yuri <yuri at rawbw.com> > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Sent: Sun, February 20, 2011 3:26:35 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Announcing: LLVM 2.9 Tentative Release Schedule > > > On Feb 19, 2011, at 8:05 PM, Yuri wrote: > > > On 02/19/2011 14:52, Yuri wrote: > >>

On 02/19/2011 14:52, Yuri wrote: > Will MC path for JNI be included in 2.9? > Sorry. I meant: Will MC path for JIT be included in 2.9?

On Feb 19, 2011, at 8:05 PM, Yuri wrote: > On 02/19/2011 14:52, Yuri wrote: >> Will MC path for JNI be included in 2.9? >> > > Sorry. I meant: Will MC path for JIT be included in 2.9? While it would be nice, it doesn't seem like anyone is working on it at the moment. -Chris

On Feb 24, 2011, at 4:05 AM, Jan Sjodin wrote: > On Feb 19, 2011, at 8:05 PM, Yuri wrote: >> >>> On 02/19/2011 14:52, Yuri wrote: >>>> Will MC path for JNI be included in 2.9? >>>> >>> >>> Sorry. I meant: Will MC path for JIT be included in 2.9? >> >> While it would be nice, it doesn't seem like anyone is working on

Will MC path for JNI be included in 2.9? Yuri

The six month release time table is coming up soon, which means that it's ready to start planning for the next release! Here is the tentative schedule: October 14th – Create 3.0 Branch October 16th – First Round of Testing Starts October 23rd – First Round of Testing Ends / Bug Fixing Begins October 30th – Second Round of Testing Starts November 6th – Second Round of Testing Ends / Bug

On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Feb 19, 2011, at 8:05 PM, Yuri wrote: > > > On 02/19/2011 14:52, Yuri wrote: > >> Will MC path for JNI be included in 2.9? > >> > > > > Sorry. I meant: Will MC path for JIT be included in 2.9? > > While it would be nice, it doesn't seem like anyone is

Hi LLVM-ites! I wanted to give you a "heads up" on the 3.3 release schedule. Branching [Important] --------------------- We will be branching for the 3.3 release one Monday, May 6th at 5PM PDT (Tuesday, May 7th 12:00 midnight GMT). Tentative Schedule ------------------ The remaining schedule will follow the normal test - bug fix - repeat process: May 6th - 11th --- Phase I

> We will be branching for the 3.3 release one Monday, May 6th at 5PM PDT (Tuesday, May 7th 12:00 midnight GMT). I noticed there is a 3.3 branch in svn, but not in git. Anton, are you still the one managing the git repos? Also, I just added a note to the release info on trunk before noticing we had branched. I was about to port it over, but then noticed that

Hi all, Mango have released their updated training schedule which includes new courses and new locations. Hadley Wickham will also be coming to London to teach Data Visualisation in R. Please see details below: Public Courses Our public courses include introductory to advanced training in general data analysis through to industry specific data analysis. Attendees of our public courses receive

I will add release branches soon. I just decided to wait a bit in case of some emergency re-creation of branches, etc. On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: >> We will be branching for the 3.3 release one Monday, May 6th at 5PM PDT (Tuesday, May 7th 12:00 midnight GMT). > > I noticed there is a 3.3 branch in svn, but not in git.

Hi all, I’m sorry for the late announcement. Here’s a tentative schedule for the 3.5 release. July 21: Branch for 3.5 release. - All features should be near completion. Changes to complete existing features will be accepted until the end of testing phase I. But they should *not* be major (i.e., large) changes. If they are, they may be rejected. July 21-27: Testing Phase I. - Binaries

First, some logistical information. The conference will be held at the San Jose Hilton. I've updated the webpage with the exact location. During registration (coming very soon!) you will have the opportunity to book a hotel room directly through that process (and get the reduced rate). Now, I'm pleased to announce the tentative agenda for the 2010 LLVM Developers' Meeting: LLDB -

On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 10:48:02AM +0000, Stilez Stilezy wrote: > As mentioned in another thread, I notice that the params used to control > symlinks feel a bit inefficient and inelegant, and quite limited.  I think > there might be a good opportunity to simplify and also make their management in > Samba more powerful and adaptable to use-cases.  I'm guessing this list is a >

It's that time again! (Well, it was that time yesterday, but I made a mistake.) The LLVM 2.9 release is now underway! 2.9 Will Be The Last llvm-gcc Release! That's right! It's the end of an era. The llvm-gcc front-end has served us very well over the years, but with the advent of Clang and DragonEgg it is starting to suffer from bit rot. Starting with the 3.0 release, Clang will be

It is very exciting to see experimental Windows support listed for 3.3. Is there documentation somewhere that tracks what works and what doesn't in this configuration, particularly for C++?. Otherwise it is difficult for those not actively involved in developing Windows support to know what to expect when experimenting. Thanks, Andrew On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Bill Wendling

On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 23:57:05 -0700 Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > Good news, everybody! > > It's that time of year again. We are going to release LLVM 2.8! I'm > taking over for Tanya to give her a much needed break. I can only > hope to perform as well as she has. This is my first time as release > manager, so bear with me if things don't go

Good news, everybody! It's that time of year again. We are going to release LLVM 2.8! I'm taking over for Tanya to give her a much needed break. I can only hope to perform as well as she has. This is my first time as release manager, so bear with me if things don't go smoothly. This message is mostly to give you an idea of the schedule we're planning on. It's an aggressive

On Aug 4, 2010, at 6:01 AM, Török Edwin wrote: > On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 23:57:05 -0700 > Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > >> Good news, everybody! >> >> It's that time of year again. We are going to release LLVM 2.8! I'm >> taking over for Tanya to give her a much needed break. I can only >> hope to perform as well as she has. This

LLVMers, I'd like to propose the following release schedule for 2.0: * April 30th - 1 week before code freeze warning email. * May 7th - Code freeze and branch creation. * May 14th - Pre-releases available for additional testing. All documentation changes committed to branch and mainline. * May 21st - Release. If anyone has objection to this schedule, please respond to the list and we can