similar to: [LLVMdev] Error while building llvm-gcc-4.2

Hello > What does this error mean? and how do i take care of it? > (And README.LLVM is not that great of a help) Have you read it? Especially the section "Configure, Build, Install, Test"? -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

I use a 64bit-x86 computer, with Fedora Core 13, and want to build the llvm-gcc. According to the README.LLVM file, I firstly built llvm 2.8 in /home/qali/install/llvm-2.8 using: $./configure $./make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1 It succeded. Then, I tried to built llvm-gcc in an 'obj' directory different from the soucre directory, using: $./llvm-gcc-4.2-2.8.source/configure

Hi, I'm new to LLVM and I want to setup the Trident Compiler system on Mac OS X. I downloaded the llvm-gcc-4.2-2.4.source.tar.gz package, created a build directory and ran the following command to configure $ ../src/configure --program-prefix=llvm- --disable-bootstrap --enable- checking --enable-languages=c,c++ $ make -j 2 Configure works fine, but I get the following error

Hello, Elvis > $ ../src/configure --program-prefix=llvm- --disable-bootstrap > --enable-checking --enable-languages=c,c++ You haven't configured llvm-gcc properly. Please do read readme.llvm file. However, afair, Trident was LLVM 1.5-based, and it will require massive rewrite to use LLVM 2.x (bytecode format was also changed) -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of

Grabbed the latest bits from SVN (, tried to build with MinGW. I get a cc1plus.exe out of memory error while trying to "make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1" on the X86CodeEmitter. I can get a full stack trace if necessary, but has anybody else run into this problem? Only seems to happen with the Release build-I got a full Debug build to work fine. Ted Neward Java, .NET, XML Services

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Scott, > >> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: >> > this is indeed a miscompilation by your system compiler.  However so many >> > compilers miscompiled this that a workaround was committed to svn.  So you >> > may want to check

Hi, I was trying to build llvm-gcc by following the instructions as given in this webpage : http://llvm.org/docs/GCCFEBuildInstrs.html on Ubuntu 7.10. At step 5 (make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=0), I am getting make errors: make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/pprabhu/llvm/llvm-objects/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libjava' /home/pprabhu/llvm/llvm-objects/gcc/gcj -B/home/pprabhu/llvm/llvm-objects/gcc/

Hello, Ted > Grabbed the latest bits from SVN (, tried to build with MinGW. I get a > cc1plus.exe out of memory error while trying to “make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1” on > the X86CodeEmitter. I can get a full stack trace if necessary, but has > anybody else run into this problem? Only seems to happen with the Release > build—I got a full Debug build to work fine. Dunno for top of the

On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > Even if you'll succeed, most probably LLVM will be miscompiled. gcc > 4.1.2 is known buggy: http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#brokengcc > Yes, so I have read -- which is why I initially installed gcc-4.2.4. My original post was looking for help on how to use gcc-4.2.4. Some

> ld-new works only with those objects which are compiled using native gcc but > doesn't work for cross-compiler gcc/arm. Ok, please show: ld --version and last few lines of the ld --help output -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

Hello > a) 'llvm-gcc -c -flo -O2' to generate the .bc files. How llvm-gcc was configured & compiled? With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

> Any help would b appreicated. This is one of my critical assignment. Well, as was already indicated - make sure that you're using the latest binutils (2.20 is not fresh enough, btw). -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

> No, I'm using the latest binutils. What is the version of 'latest' ? -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

> But I wanted to say is using these binutils I have built a llvm compiler for > our ARM target. That's correct. Mostly because gcc is using pre-UAL ARM assembler syntax and LLVM switched fully to UAL one. Also, UAL is needed for correct Thumb-2 support, etc. So, in short: gcc is generating some subset of ARM assembler and thus gas is bug-free. LLVM generates somehow different subset and

Yes, I'm following this page only and did whatever is mentioned there. On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Sanjeev chugh <sanjuchugh at gmail.com> wrote: > Did you mean ld-new ? > > ld-new -v > GNU gold (GNU Binutils 2.20.51.20100707) 1.9 > > ld-new --help > ./ld-new: supported targets: elf32-i386 elf32-i386-freebsd elf64-x86-64 > elf64-x86-64-freebsd elf64-sparc

Hi, Csaba Thanks for the tip. My PS3 workstationn is installed a 32-bit OS. I will install a 64-bit OS soon and try what you said. Thanks again. Regards, chenwj -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Parallel Processing Lab, Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.) Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667

Hi, I am wondering whether the latest llvm-gcc version is 4.2. This is the latest version I can find on llvm web site. Thanks a lot! Best, Linhai

> Sorry about that.  As you can see, I'm using binutils (ld & as ) from arm > toolchain we use to build things for our target. > > arm_a_b_c_ld -v gives 2.17.50.20070611 > > arm_a_b_c_as -v gives 2.17.50.20070611 This is definitely not the latest binutils you've stated before. As you might see - these are at least 3 years old and are known to be heavily buggy on ARM.

i just downloaded LLVM 4.2 binaries for Mingw (including the GCC 4.2 front-end), and received the infamous "llvm-gcc: CreateProcess: no such file or directory" error message when trying to compile hello.c from the command-line.... i've already placed to bin directory containing llvm-gcc in my PATH, but still no luck....

> exactly Well, in general, there is no connection between the performance on x86 and on ARM. You can try to profile your code and find what causes the speedup on x86 and figure out the slowdowns on ARM. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University