similar to: [LLVMdev] X86 Instructions on LLVM

Hello, I'm trying to write assembler code writer, and of course, have new questions. I'd like the structure my implementation like this: if (/*binary instruction*/) { // print destination O << " = "; // print first operand O << opcode; // print second operand. } if (/* unary instruction */ ) { .... } if (/*control instruction*/) { ....

Hi all, A question about statically linking a pass to clang instead of dynamically loading it at runtime. I am stumped on this bug for a while. I inserted a pass under lib/Transforms/mypass directory, registered it with INITIALIZE_PASS and defined createMyPass in the pass. Also I added file mypass.h in include/llvm/Transforms/ to expose the accessor functions that expose my passes. Entries are

On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Zeng Bin <ezengbin at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> There might be a bug in DeadStoreElimination.cpp. This pass eliminates >> stores backwards aggressively in an end BB. It does not check dependencies >> on stores in an end BB though.

If int_guard_load returns a pointer based on the passed-in pointer, it captures it (at least according to the definition of "capture" which NoCapture uses). -Eli On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Zeng Bin <ezengbin at gmail.com> wrote: > It does not do anything. It is an abstract function which transforms a > pointer and returns another pointer of the same type. It does not

Hi all, I am really stumped on this problem. I googled and could not find any solution. Here is the problem. I compiled and installed glibc-2.5-20090518 in a local directory with gcc version 4.1.2. I compiled glibc-2.5 because I wanted to test glibc-2.5 on gcc first llvm-gcc. However, after I installed glibc, llvm-gcc does not work any more. It reported this error message:

It does not do anything. It is an abstract function which transforms a pointer and returns another pointer of the same type. It does not visit memory or capture the pointer parameter. On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at

On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > Hello, > I'm trying to write assembler code writer, and of course, have new questions. > I'd like the structure my implementation like this: > if (/*binary instruction*/) { > if (/* unary instruction */ ) { > if (/*control instruction*/) { Okay, that should be no problem. > The question is how to write those

Hi all, There might be a bug in DeadStoreElimination.cpp. This pass eliminates stores backwards aggressively in an end BB. It does not check dependencies on stores in an end BB though. For example, in this code snippet: ... 1. %sum.safe_r47.pre-phi = phi i64* [ %sum.safe_r47.pre, %entry.for.end_crit_edge ], [ %sum.safe_r42, %for.body ] 2. %call9 = call i32 @gettimeofday(%struct.timeval* %end,

I try to use RBloomberg to get the dividend for IBM. However, blpGetData(conn, "IBM EQUITY", field="EQY_DVD_HIST_ALL", start=as.chron("1980-01-01")) doesn't work. It returns EQY_DVD_HIST_ALL (10/02/08 14:46:36) NA I have to used blpGetData(conn, "IBM EQUITY", "EQY_DVD_SH_12M_NET",

I am trying to extract one particular piece of data(Float) from all the data returned by yahooKeystats, but thus far I'm having no luck. This is what I've got so far: > library(fImport) Loading required package: timeSeries Loading required package: timeDate > data<-yahooKeystats("IBM") trying URL 'http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=IBM' Content type 'text/html;

Objects compiled for the MS-ABI don't conform to it! Data types beyond 64 bit MUST BE returned by the callee via the hidden first argument allocated by the caller, NOT in XMM0! Demo/proof: from this source --- llvm-bug.c --- #ifndef __clang__ typedef struct { unsigned __int64 low; unsigned __int64 high; } __uint128_t; #else __attribute__((ms_abi)) #endif __uint128_t

Hi All, I have a dataframe, divs, that looks like this: > divs date ticker dividend 263 20010322 ADBE 0.025 264 20010628 ADBE 0.025 265 20010927 ADBE 0.025 4308 20010212 ED 0.550 4309 20010514 ED 0.410 5416 20010330 GE 0.137 5417 20010629 GE 0.137 5418 20010928

On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Zeng Bin <ezengbin at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > There might be a bug in DeadStoreElimination.cpp. This pass eliminates > stores backwards aggressively in an end BB. It does not check dependencies > on stores in an end BB though. For example, in this code snippet: >   ... > 1.  %sum.safe_r47.pre-phi = phi i64* [ %sum.safe_r47.pre,

On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 04:08:13PM +0400, Robert Khasanov wrote: > Hi Reid, > > Would you approve your patches r203146 and r202774 to be backported to > 3.4.1? They fix stability issues in x86 asm. > Hi Robert, I was able to merge r203146, but it used a c++11 feature: std::string::back() which I replaced with std::string::at(std::string::size() - 1). r202774 was not merged,

Hi all, I am really stumped on this problem. I googled and could not find any solution. Here is the problem. I compiled and installed glibc-2.5-20090518 in a local directory with gcc version 4.1.2. I compiled glibc-2.5 because I wanted to test glibc-2.5 on gcc first llvm-gcc. However, after I installed glibc, llvm-gcc does not work any more. It reported this error message:

Hi all, Just a quick question about passing information all the way down to machine code level. Metadata provides an excellent vehicle to pass extra ad-hoc information along the compilation pipeline. However, If I understand correctly, it seems that MachineInstr does not support metadata, by which I mean metadata cannot be attached to MachineInstr's by now. Metadata can be bundled with

This patch supplies software IEEE floating point support. The comment from the patch reproduced below says all there is to say. This patch contains the prior "cleanup" patch; please don't apply that one. Please let me know of any bugs. It is tested reasonably well, but until I put together random tests it's hard to have 100% confidence. Neil. /* A self-contained host- and

Hi all, I am really stumped on a problem for long. I could not figure out why. That is why i am here. OK, here is the problem: I tried to insert a MachineBasicBlock into a function. Here is the code snippet: // insert a machine basic block with the error_label into MF and before I // Pred is the predecessor of the block to be inserted // the new basic block is inserted right before I void

Hi, I am new to LLVM and am trying to modify clang for some work. I tried to insert an instruction: prefetchnta $100 at the beginning of a function. I encountered a problem when I tried to debug it with gdb. There was an assertion failure and printed some information without stack trace. The process has been finished when it printed the information. I tried to set a breakpoint at the

Hi all R-users, I?m trying to assign colors on those p-value in my table output that fall above a certain critical value, let?s say a p-value >0.05. My table looks like this: Assets ADF-Level P-Value ADF-First D P-Value ADF-Second D P-Value [1,] Liabilities -2.3109 0.1988 -3.162 0.025 -6.0281