Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] CMake-generated llvm-config."
2011 Jan 27
0
[LLVMdev] CMake-generated llvm-config.
arrowdodger <6yearold at gmail.com> writes:
>> Here is output of llvm-config built by CMake:
>
>> ~/.local/llvm/bin/llvm-config --cflags
>> -I/usr/home/arr/.local/llvm/include -O3 -DNDEBUG -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS
>> -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -Wall -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings
>> -pedantic -Wno-long-long
>>
> Note -pedantic here.
Committed
2011 Jan 27
0
[LLVMdev] CMake-generated llvm-config.
[cc-ing llvm-dev]
arrowdodger <6yearold at gmail.com> writes:
> Hello. I've found that CMake-generated llvm-config contains -pedantic flag,
> if LLVM_ENABLE_PEDANTIC was ON during cmake configuration.
> This forces all llvm-config clients to build their sources with -pedantic,
> which, i think, is kind of wrong.
> For example, it's not possible to build LDC (LLVM D
2009 Mar 05
1
[LLVMdev] Fwd: PPC Nightly Build Result
FYI: It also showed up for ARM yesterday, but only for a non-debug
build.
On Mar 5, 2009, at 4:32 AM, Gabor Greif wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> this might be a latent bug related to PPC. I have no such
> machine to access atm., but I shall be able to reproduce the
> problem when back at home. (In about 4 hours).
>
> I keep you informed.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Gabor
>
2009 Mar 05
0
[LLVMdev] Fwd: PPC Nightly Build Result
Hi Bill,
this might be a latent bug related to PPC. I have no such
machine to access atm., but I shall be able to reproduce the
problem when back at home. (In about 4 hours).
I keep you informed.
Cheers,
Gabor
On Mar 4, 7:57 pm, Bill Wendling <wendl... at apple.com> wrote:
> Something last night broke the build on Darwin PPC. Possible Gabor's
> check-in?
>
> -bw
2009 Mar 04
2
[LLVMdev] Fwd: PPC Nightly Build Result
Something last night broke the build on Darwin PPC. Possible Gabor's
check-in?
-bw
Begin forwarded message:
> From: admin at spang.apple.com (admin)
> Date: March 4, 2009 3:56:10 AM PST
> To: wendling at apple.com
> Subject: PPC Nightly Build Result
>
> /Volumes/SandBox/NightlyTest/llvmgcc42.roots/llvmgcc42~obj/obj-
> powerpc-powerpc/./prev-gcc/xgcc
2011 Apr 08
0
[LLVMdev] dragonegg build failure
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 01:58:10PM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote:
>> Is there anything I can do to make the build more verbose so I can debug this?
>
> make VERBOSE=1
Duncan,
Oddly this shows...
GCC=/sw/lib/gcc4.5/bin/gcc-4 LLVM_CONFIG=/sw/bin/llvm-config make VERBOSE=1 CPPFLAGS="-DENABLE_LTO -I/sw/include"
Compiling utils/TargetInfo.cpp
g++ -c
2009 Jun 01
2
[LLVMdev] CMake build maturity
Paul Melis wrote:
> Óscar Fuentes wrote:
>
>> Paul Melis <llvm at assumetheposition.nl> writes:
>>
>>
>>
>>> It seems that the llvm-config generated when building through CMake does
>>> not contain -lpthread on my 32-bit Core2Duo Gentoo Linux system (even
>>> though I configured with LLVM_ENABLE_PTHREADS). I get missing
2012 Nov 21
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-config --cxxflags is not consistent when building by cmake.
Hi,
We found `llvm-config --cxxflags' does not have -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti
when using cmake to build LLVM.
Does anyone know how to fix it?
Best regards,
Luba
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Luba Tang <lubatang at gmail.com>
Date: 2012/11/21
Subject: Re: [MCLinker] Re: Major release - MCLinker 2.0.0 - RockBull
To: mclinker at googlegroups.com
Hi,
We make sure the
2009 Jun 01
0
[LLVMdev] CMake build maturity
Óscar Fuentes wrote:
> Paul Melis <llvm at assumetheposition.nl> writes:
>
>
>> It seems that the llvm-config generated when building through CMake does
>> not contain -lpthread on my 32-bit Core2Duo Gentoo Linux system (even
>> though I configured with LLVM_ENABLE_PTHREADS). I get missing symbols
>> during linking of e.g. the JIT tutorial code:
>>
2009 May 27
2
[LLVMdev] CMake build maturity
Paul Melis <llvm at assumetheposition.nl> writes:
> It seems that the llvm-config generated when building through CMake does
> not contain -lpthread on my 32-bit Core2Duo Gentoo Linux system (even
> though I configured with LLVM_ENABLE_PTHREADS). I get missing symbols
> during linking of e.g. the JIT tutorial code:
[snip]
This should be fixed now. Now about this one:
>
2010 Apr 10
3
[LLVMdev] darwin dragon-egg build issues
Is anyone building dragon-egg on darwin? I am trying
to build against the fink gcc45 package that I have prepared
for darwin and a updated fink llvm 2.7 package that is built
as...
../llvm-2.7/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib/llvm --mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/share/info --with-gmp=/sw --with-libiconv-prefix=/usr --with-system-zlib --with-as=/Developer/usr/bin/as
2009 May 27
0
[LLVMdev] CMake build maturity
Hi Oscar,
Óscar Fuentes wrote:
> Paul Melis <llvm at assumetheposition.nl> writes:
>
> [snip]
>
> Thanks! Fixed.
>
> BTW, bug reports are welcome.
>
It seems that the llvm-config generated when building through CMake does
not contain -lpthread on my 32-bit Core2Duo Gentoo Linux system (even
though I configured with LLVM_ENABLE_PTHREADS). I get missing symbols
2011 Jun 24
2
[LLVMdev] Missing symbols in pass stack trace
> Try building with "make VERBOSE=1", which will show you the
> command-lines passed to the compiler/linker. Post the output here.
there you go:
> cafxx at ubuntu:~/Projects/llvm2/lib/Transforms/cgf$ make VERBOSE=1
> llvm[0]: Compiling CGFPass.cpp for Debug+Asserts build (PIC)
> if g++ -I/home/cafxx/Projects/llvm2/include
>
2010 Apr 10
0
[LLVMdev] darwin dragon-egg build issues
Hi Jack,
> Is anyone building dragon-egg on darwin?
Anton built it once. There were some problems with dynamic libraries: gcc's
plugin support requires the use of dynamic libraries, and the configure logic
it uses thinks that darwin does not support dynamic libraries! So it is
possible that plugin support was automatically disabled because of this. Try
configuring with
2011 Jun 24
0
[LLVMdev] Missing symbols in pass stack trace
On Jun 24, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Carlo Alberto Ferraris wrote:
>
>> Try building with "make VERBOSE=1", which will show you the command-lines passed to the compiler/linker. Post the output here.
> there you go:
>> cafxx at ubuntu:~/Projects/llvm2/lib/Transforms/cgf$ make VERBOSE=1
>> llvm[0]: Compiling CGFPass.cpp for Debug+Asserts build (PIC)
>> if g++
2012 Apr 08
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM show error preprocessor "Must #define __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS before #including Support/DataTypes.h"
Hello All,
I build source code of Ocelot[http://code.google.com/p/gpuocelot/]. It
using LLVM dependency of Ocelot. llvm-config get cppflags represent as
below in order to build with Ocelot.
./llvm-config --cppflags
-I/home/chatsiri/workspacecpp/llvm/include
-I/home/chatsiri/workspacecpp/llvm/include -D_DEBUG -D_GNU_SOURCE
-D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS
2010 Apr 11
0
[LLVMdev] darwin dragon-egg build issues
Hi Jack,
> bash-3.2$ GCC=/sw/bin/gcc-4 CC=gcc-4 CXX=g++-4 CFLAGS=-I/sw/include CXXFLAGS=-I/sw/include LLVM_CONFIG=/sw/lib/llvm/bin/llvm-config make
> g++-4 -c -I/sw/lib/llvm/include -D_DEBUG -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -MD -MP -DIN_GCC -DREVISION=\"100954M\" -DTARGET_NAME=\"x86_64-apple-darwin10.3.0\" -I/Users/howarth/llvm_svn/dragonegg
2011 Oct 12
1
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [llvm] r139934 - in /llvm/trunk: autoconf/configure.ac configure
This CL is probably apropos to the issue described below..
We here in the PNaCL team are building llvm+clang using a specially
bootstrapped version of llvm-gcc.
Unfortunately, the configure is picking up system clang even though we force
set CC and CXX during the configure process.
llvm[2]: Compiling CommandLine.cpp for Release+Asserts build
if clang++ -I<LLVMSRC>/include
2009 Jul 31
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc build of inferno/plan 9 'mk' fails
hello,
I'm attempting to build the inferno source tree using either of native
LTO or jit'd bins and having no obvious luck.
im using macports (current as of this email) llvm-2.5 and llvm-gcc on
a macbook pro (x86)
following the inferno directions verbatim will use 'cc' as the
compiler and just works.
the build tools are different from the naive build tools as follows:
2018 Aug 29
3
Get full cmake lines and prepocessed source for a GCC bug report
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 9:45 AM, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> for filing a GCC v8.2.0 bug in Debian/buster AMD64 the Debian/GCC
>> mainatiners want two things...
>>
>> [ FULL CMAKE LINE ]
>>
>> How do I