similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM targeting HLLs

On Jan 24, 2011, at 2:01 PM, David Given wrote: > I am interested in using LLVM to translate C and C++ into high-level > language code. (As an update to an earlier project of mine, Clue, which > used the Sparse compiler library to do this: it targets Lua, Javascript, > Perl 5, C, Java and Common Lisp, with a disturbing amount of success. > See http://cluecc.sourceforge.net for

David Given <dg at cowlark.com> writes: > The obvious place to start on this is the C backend, except in these 2.8 > days the C backend is so hedged about with caveats I'm rather wary of > basing anything on it. I also recall seeing comments here that it's due > for a rewrite from scratch, and that various people were looking into > it. Can anyone go into more detail

On Jan 24, 2011, at 2:01 PM, David Given wrote: > I am interested in using LLVM to translate C and C++ into high-level > language code. (As an update to an earlier project of mine, Clue, which > used the Sparse compiler library to do this: it targets Lua, Javascript, > Perl 5, C, Java and Common Lisp, with a disturbing amount of success. > See http://cluecc.sourceforge.net for

On 25/01/11 00:17, David A. Greene wrote: [...] > The rewrite is happening. I've got the skeleton of the codegen done, > but I have to get it to build before I can check it in. After that, > everyone can start adding patterns. Is the new C backend 'register' based, that is, generating lots of little statements operating on lots of variables, rather than producing the huge

Hi, it's my first time to write a loop with R for my homework. This loop is part of the function. I wanna assign values for hll according to panel [ii,1]=pp. I didn't get any error message in this part. but then when I further calculate another stuff with hll, the function can't return. I think it must be some problem in my loop. Probably something stupid or easy. But I tried to look

Hi Daniele and Arnaud, While tracking down the Cyber Power voltage scaling issue, I found the DDL repository extremely helpful. Instead of searching across all of the old mailing list posts, I was able to run 'git grep' in the Cyber Power directory, and the consistency of the data made it an easy task. I had a motherboard failure on my main computer, and I was trying to recreate the

I checked recent revisions 138624 and 138620 and both produce this log with gcc-4.6.0 on FreeBSD-8.2-STABLE amd64: gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/home/yuri/llvm-svn/llvm-objects/lib/CodeGen' llvm[2]: Compiling LLVMTargetMachine.cpp for Release build /usr/home/yuri/llvm-svn/llvm/lib/CodeGen/LLVMTargetMachine.cpp:253:3: error: ‘AsmStreamer’ does not name a type

Hi Ankur, > The flags "-view-sched-dags".. described in the doc doesn't seem to work. ( > "llc -help" doesn't list it ). as far as I remember, displaying DAGs during compilation is only enabled in "debug builds" [1] of LLVM. You probably have to re-configure and re-compile LLVM to enable this feature. Best regards, Christoph [1]

I am trying to understand the SelectionDAG construction from LLVM IR. I have gone through the doc "The LLVM Target-Independent Code Generator" on LLVM site. This gives a great initial overview. However I am unable to catch the actual control flow for the llvm->selectionDag conversion. The flags "-view-sched-dags".. described in the doc doesn't seem to work. ( "llc

Hi There, Using t.test to test hypothesis about which one is greater, A or B? where A={10,20,30},B={25,30,15}. My question is which of the following conclusions is right? #################hypothesis testing 1 h0: A greater than or equal to B h1: A less than B below is splus code A=c(10,20,30) B=c(25,30,15) t.test(c(10,20,30),c(25,30,15),alternative="less") output: p-value=0.3359

I am working on a LLVM backend for a new platform. The target has a virtual instruction set and unlimited virtual registers. After going through LLVM documentation and source code, it looks like there are two possible ways to implement it with LLVM: 1) Method #1: follow common code generator path (TableGen, LLVMTargetMachine, etc), similarly as the Sparc and x86 targets. Since the target has

Hi everyone, I'm working in a company to port LLVM on their own processors. I'm try to support several set of instructions and several architectures. I'm using the "--target" options to choose my set of instructions, and I would like to use the "-mcpu" to choose the architecture of which I want to compile the code. Does it seem right? But at the moment I cannot

Hello. How can I compute the Bootstrap p-Value for a one- and two sided test, when I have a bootstrap sample of a statistic of 1000 for example? My hypothesis are for example: 1. Two-Sided: H0: mean=0 vs. H1: mean!=0 2. One Sided: H0: mean>=0 vs. H1: mean<0 I hope you can help me Thanks in advance Regards, Andreas

Hi everybody, somehow i dont get the shapiro wilk test for normality. i just can?t find what the H0 is . i tried : shapiro.test(rnorm(5000)) Shapiro-Wilk normality test data: rnorm(5000) W = 0.9997, p-value = 0.6205 If normality is the H0, the test says it?s probably not normal, doesn ?t it ? 5000 is the biggest n allowed by the test... are there any other test ? ( i know qqnorm

The distinction between the LLVMTargetMachine and TargetMachine classes has become somewhat muddy recently. So I created: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38482 to clean things up. During review it was noted that we may rather merge the two instead which looks like this: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38489 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D38489> We really should choose one of the two over the status quo.

dear all. Would someone be kind and willing to explain the code below for a person who has never used R? ( that is if one has enough time and inclination) It implements gillepsie's stochastic algorithm for Lotka Volterra model. What would help me tremendously is to see the breakdown of the line by line code into plain english. thanks for any insights or other comments. sean

Hi, is there a test for the H0 skewness=0 (or with skewness as test statistic and normality as H0) implemented in R? Thank you, Christian *********************************************************************** Christian Hennig Fachbereich Mathematik-SPST/ZMS, Universitaet Hamburg hennig at math.uni-hamburg.de, http://www.math.uni-hamburg.de/home/hennig/

Hi everybody, i'm dealing with some percentage tables, of which i should test rowwise if the entries are sgnificantly equal or not. Namely, on row 1, test H0: element 1= element2, H0: element 1= element3...H0: element 2= element3...H0: element n-1= element n. The same on the other rows. Anybody knows how this can be done in quick way? I don't have large matrices, but it seems quite

> Is this the current layout? > > nut-website (branch: dll-hll) > \__ nut submodule (branch: master) > \__ ddl submodule (branch unknown?) nut-website (branch: dll-hll) \__ nut submodule (branch: master @ abc0006 [not updated to avoid conflicts when merging back to master]) \__ ddl submodule (branch: master @ bbfd79f; now updated to ab6166c) > The "ddl" branch

Currently, the MachO and ELF Writers and MachineCodeEmitters are hard-coded into LLVMTargetMachine and llc. In other words, the 'object file generation' capabilities of the Common Code Generator are not generic. LLVMTargetMachine::addPassesToEmitFile explicitly checks whether the derived backend TargetMachine implements one of getMachOWriterInfo or getELFWriterInfo, and returns a