similar to: [LLVMdev] How to extend llvm IR and frontend?

On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Aaron Myles Landwehr <snaphat at gmail.com> wrote: > Hypothetically, suppose I have a generic system with multiple address spaces > such that each address space is accessed using different instructions. > Now suppose, I wanted to add a new keywords 'foo' and 'bar' to the front of > c variables and function return types such that

Hi all, Recently, I discovered a defect in GCC's code generation for x86_64 targets when SSE is disabled. Upon testing with LLVM 3.2, I found that it also has the same issues so I'm linking a GCC bug report I made. The proposed solution for the second issue listed there also applies to LLVM: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59277 As I noted in the bug report, I'm not sure

Hello, What is the correct way to use address_space attribute? For CLANG, I used the below code, but when I tried the same with LLVM, I got a warning. Thanks in advance, Juan Carlos ----------------------------- Code used: #define GS_RELATIVE __attribute__((address_space(256))) int foo(int GS_RELATIVE *P) { return *P; } int main(){ return (1); } ------------------------------

Hi, all I am trying to selfhost LLVM and Clang. Below is my flow, Step 1. Build LLVM and Clang by using native gcc $ ../llvm-2.9/configure --prefix=$INSTALL \ --enable-optimized Step 2. Build LLVM and Clang by using clang built by step 1 $ CC=clang CXX=clang++ ../llvm-2.9/configure \ --prefix=$INSTALL --enable-optimized But in step 2, I have a compilation error below, -- llvm[1]:

Thanks again for your help! > >> > >> Probably fairly minimal in most cases (on x86). On ARM there is > >> definitely a cost. > >> > > hm... why? You cannot have indexed addressing? > What I need is a way to force > The code that needs to be emitted is roughly: > [..."segment"-offset into x1...] > mrs x0, tpidr_el0 >

If I use a simple dtrace script such as this: fbt::somefunc:entry{self->trace=1;} fbt::somefunc:return{self->trace=0;} fbt:::entry{} fbt:::return{printf("%lx", arg1);} then it will descend to whatever depth is necessary If I want to limit it to say 3 functions deep, how can I do that? The quick answer I want to use is to do "self->depth++" on each entry and then

Hi, suppose I do: b <- matrix(1:9,3,3) bname <- "b" now dim(b) returns [1] 3 3 and dim(bname) returns NULL is there a function to pass bname to such that dim returns the dimensions of b? like dim(somefunc(bname)) returns [1] 3 3 does 'somefunc' exist? daver +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |David Richmond It

Hi all, Just looking over fole_s_connect() in win32ole.c and I noticed this bit: hr = CLSIDFromProgID(pBuf, &clsid); ... hr = GetActiveObject(&clsid, 0, &pUnknown); ... hr = pUnknown->lpVtbl->QueryInterface( pUnknown, &IID_IDispatch, (void **)&pDispatch ); Using win32-api, that would be something like: IID_IUnknown =

I created a plugin to add simple Annotations to VarDecls and FieldDecls, and write this modified AST out to a file. I notice that when I use clang to compile this file I get different code then when I use the source directly. In both cases I'm compiling with -O4. Can anyone explain this? Thanks define i32 @somefunc(i32 (i32)* %ptr) nounwind uwtable { entry: %ptr.addr = alloca i32 (i32)*,

Hi, I have migrated an LLVM front-end from LLVM 3.5 to 3.8 and now to 3.9 and ORC, and there is a concept which I could not transfer. Consider: extern "C" { void somefunc() {} } … auto llvmfunc = llvm::Function::Create(type, llvmFunction::PrivateLinkage, "bla", module)); executionengine.addGlobalMapping(llvmfunc, &somefunc); // now I have llvmfunc to work with and

Hello, I'm not sure how to state my question in a technically accurate manner, so I'll use a short example to clarify my problem: Say I have a vector, vec<-c(1,2,3,2) I would like to be able to "reference" the vector by using the string containing the name of the vector - that is, I would like to know of some function which is able to convert the string "vec"

> I created a plugin to add simple Annotations to VarDecls and > FieldDecls, and write this modified AST out to a file. I notice that > when I use clang to compile this file I get different code then when I > use the source directly. In both cases I'm compiling with -O4. Can > anyone explain this? This is how clang implements annotations on local variables, that's all.

I''ve got a table of what I call resources, want to show in a jQuery dialog a particular record when user clicks button in a row. in the table I''m doing: <td><%=button_to_function ''Show'',''showresource1()'',:class =>"ui-button ui-state-default ui-corner-all", :id => resource.id %></td> js: <script

I''m attempting to use caches_page to speed up the loading of certain pages on my site, and have run into a couple questions: 1) The site has ''states'' (as in U.S. states), so I have a State model and a States controller. Going to http://sitename/states/ routes you to the States controller, ''index'' action. The States controller looks like so: class

Dear R Core Team, I learnt approx. two years ago in this mailing list that one can use the following "trick" to get a (dotted pair)list of the ellipsis arguments inside a function: `substitute(...())` Now my problem is that I can not find any occurrence of this call within the R source - the most frequent solution there is `substitute(list(...))[-1L] ` I would like to know if: 1)

I am having trouble understanding how the 'by' function works. Using this bit of code: i <- data.frame(x=c(1,2,3), y=c(0,0,0), B=c("red","blue","blue")) j <- data.frame(x=c(1,2,3), y=c(1,1,1), B=c('red','blue','green')) plot(0, 0, type="n", xlim=c(0,4), ylim=c(0,1)) by(i, i$B, function(s){ points(s$x, s$y, col=s$B) })

The patch was created against a 1.4 tree. However, it applies cleanly to mainline too. The patch has been lightly tested. I am running fill_verify_holes on a non sparse volume currently. Please review. Sunil

I have a working dialplan for our phone system with Mon-Fri, business hours identification, etc. But what I'm lacking right now is support for company holiday dates. What I'd like to do is to create a database of these dates and just update them as new years rollover. I suspect others have done this sort of thing with Asterisk before, but I've not found any resources so far.

I''m following the Depot tutorial in the Rails book, and have just hit a wall. As instructed by the tutorial, I added the following code to the Product model: protected def validate errors.add(:price, "should be positive") unless price > 0.0 end When I attempt to add a new product, I''m getting an error: undefined method `>'' for nil:NilClass

The answer was (thanks to Mark Leeds) to do with the use of a factor instead of a vector. on [2017-08-05] at 08:57 Myles English writes: > I am having trouble understanding how the 'by' function works. Using > this bit of code: > > i <- data.frame(x=c(1,2,3), y=c(0,0,0), B=c("red","blue","blue")) > j <- data.frame(x=c(1,2,3),