similar to: [LLVMdev] DWARF version

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] DWARF version"

2010 Aug 16
3
[LLVMdev] -fomit-frame-pointer on intel darwin
Can anyone shed some light on the origins of the comments... /* Mach-O doesn't support omitting the frame pointer for now. */ ...in gcc/config/i386/i386.c. FSF gcc trunk has enabled the omit-frame-pointer option as the default for both i386 and x86_64 recently. * config.gcc: Handle --enable-frame-pointer. * configure.ac: Add --enable-frame-pointer. * configure: Regenerated. *
2012 Oct 17
0
[LLVMdev] DWARF 2/3 backwards compatibility?
> My GDB Testsuite runs have been failing more tests, and now an internal test > has started failing on some missing dwarf 3 records. What is the error message or the nature of the failures you are seeing ? Pranav Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
2012 Oct 17
2
[LLVMdev] DWARF 2/3 backwards compatibility?
My GDB Testsuite runs have been failing more tests, and now an internal test has started failing on some missing dwarf 3 records. Changing compile flags to emit dwarf 2 didn't help. In the past there has been some effort to pass GDB Testsuite, including Dwarf 2 backwards compatibility. What is the plan/mechanism for maintaining Dwarf 2/3 compatibility? -- Rick Foos Qualcomm Innovation
2006 Aug 23
4
Lotus Notes 7.01 crashes after 30 seconds
Hi there, I try to install Lotus Notes 7.01 via Wine0.9.19 on Suse 10.0. I can put all the setup items on Lotus Notes and login to my mailbox, but after 30 seconds Notes crash. This is the output what I see in console: fixme:uniscribe:ScriptRecordDigitSubstitution 1024,0x621341ec fixme:ole:CoRegisterMessageFilter message filter has been registered, but will not be used
2012 Oct 17
2
[LLVMdev] DWARF 2/3 backwards compatibility?
The error we are getting is: "Undefined Form Value: 25" We have customers that have a variety of debuggers, and we need to be able to preserve Dwarf3 compatibility. GDB, Lauterbach, etc. The patch that caused a problem for us is: https://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfCompileUnit.cpp?r1=162493&r2=162526&pathrev=162526&diff_format=h
2020 Mar 10
2
DWARF .debug_aranges data objects and address spaces
Hello I've been looking at a debuginfo issue on an out-of-tree target which uses DWARF aranges. The problem is that aranges are generated for both data and code objects, and the debugger gets confused when program addresses overlap data addresses. The target is a Harvard Architecture CPU, so the appearance of overlapping address ranges is not in itself a bug as they reside in different
2013 Apr 27
3
[LLVMdev] How to prevent LLVM from emitting R_X86_64_32 ELF relocations?
On 04/26/2013 19:50, Jiong Wang wrote: > > > why do you want to prevent R_X86_64_32 generation? for 32bit dwarf, > I think generation of R_X86_64_32 is reasonable. > > you can check http://dwarfstd.org/doc/DWARF4.pdf. Because R_X86_64_32 elements are 4-byte addresses and can't be relocated for the 64-bit address space over 32-bit limit. Dwarf2 actually allows for
2012 Dec 18
2
[LLVMdev] target specific ways to extend ConstantExpr
We cannot use bitcast because bitcast is a value preserving operation, but the address space conversion operation we have is a bit-changing operation. Where will the bulk of work be? Can we make a ConstantExpr which has a new Opcode (or reuse call) and a list of operands? The first operand is a string. From: Chris Lattner [mailto:clattner at apple.com] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 4:39 PM To:
2012 Dec 18
2
[LLVMdev] target specific ways to extend ConstantExpr
The particular case we are looking at is converting a pointer from one address space to another address space. There is one operand and one output, both are the same pointer type, except for their address space. The pointers are of the same size. The operation is a bit-changing operation. We are using intrinsic functions for the instructions. We need a solution for the ConstantExpr. Instead of
2017 Apr 04
2
GDB doesn't work with IR-originated debug info
Hi all, Need your help. I added some debug information to my code according to Kaleidoscope-9 sample and got stuck with a GDB error: (gdb) info functions > invalid dwarf2 offset 1849950870 > My module is a DLL built with llc+ld toolchain. Target triple: 'i686-w64-mingw32'. Looking this offset (1849950870 == 0x6e440296) in dwarfdump output of the dll gave the following:
2010 Aug 16
0
[LLVMdev] -fomit-frame-pointer on intel darwin
On Aug 16, 2010, at 7:59 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > Despite the absence of testsuite failures at -m32 or -m64 on either > i386-apple-darwin10 or x86_64-apple-darwin10, there are still some concerns > about the origins of the original Mach-O comment above. There also was > a concern that -fomit-frame-pointer would break Shark but my testing in > darwin10 suggests it still can profile
2009 Dec 02
3
[LLVMdev] A few more source level debugging questions
So, based on the info that I got from Devang, I was able to solve the problem with the duplicate assembly symbols, although I still don't quite understand why it was generating erroneous metadata in the first place. For example, through trial and error I discovered that the problem disappeared if I passed my DICompileUnit to CreateLocation() rather than my DISubprogram, but I don't know
2012 Dec 17
2
[LLVMdev] target specific ways to extend ConstantExpr
I am looking for a way to allow ConstantExpr to express target specific operations, which will be used in global initializers. The recommended way to extend LLVM IR is using intrinsic functions. But this does not work for ConstantExpr, which the global initializer uses. Should we make ConstantExpr to support some kind of side-effect free intrinsic function calls? If we want to work on such a
2012 Dec 18
0
[LLVMdev] target specific ways to extend ConstantExpr
On Dec 17, 2012, at 4:23 PM, Yuan Lin <yulin at nvidia.com> wrote: > The particular case we are looking at is converting a pointer from one address space to another address space. There is one operand and one output, both are the same pointer type, except for their address space. The pointers are of the same size. The operation is a bit-changing operation. > We are using intrinsic
2012 Dec 18
0
[LLVMdev] target specific ways to extend ConstantExpr
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Yuan Lin <yulin at nvidia.com> wrote: > We cannot use bitcast because bitcast is a value preserving operation, but > the address space conversion operation we have is a bit-changing operation. > > > > Where will the bulk of work be? Can we make a ConstantExpr which has a new > Opcode (or reuse call) and a list of operands? The first
2012 Dec 17
0
[LLVMdev] target specific ways to extend ConstantExpr
On Dec 17, 2012, at 11:26 AM, Yuan Lin <yulin at nvidia.com> wrote: > I am looking for a way to allow ConstantExpr to express target specific operations, which will be used in global initializers. > > The recommended way to extend LLVM IR is using intrinsic functions. But this does not work for ConstantExpr, which the global initializer uses. > > Should we make
2016 Dec 06
1
Kernel panic after kernel update
HI! On one qemu-kvm instance a kernel update failed and booting the image is not possible anymore (see below). A dozen other VMs are correctly working after the upgrade. Anything I can quickly try to make it work again? (This is not really a bad emergency case because I could simply re-install and re-configure with ansible. But I'd like to learn about these cases...) Ciao, Michael. Loading
2007 Mar 19
2
Wine crash
Hello, I can't use Wine from version >=0.9.18 anymore. It compiles ok and then it crashes somewhere in the middle of installation, I think when Wine tries to execute something. Even when I try to run winecfg it crashes. It worked with Wine version 0.9.17 and lower. Anyone have any idea what's wrong ? I'm running Slackware 10.0. Below is what happens when I try to run winecfg.
2012 Dec 18
1
[LLVMdev] target specific ways to extend ConstantExpr
That's an interesting idea. What are the essential differences between the new subclass and ConstantExpr? Will it end up like ConstantExpr? Or you want it to be ConstantExpr 'done right'? Thanks. Yuan -----Original Message----- From: Eli Friedman [mailto:eli.friedman at gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 5:40 PM To: Yuan Lin Cc: Chris Lattner; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
2006 Aug 20
1
yetisports fails to start
Hi ! Playing yetisports 1,2,4 and 5 works with cvs version of wine- Starting yetisports 8,7,6 and 3 fails: yetisports 8 -------------- wine: Unhandled page fault on read access to 0x02af1d74 at address 0x0000:0x00403f0e (thread 0009), starting debugger... WineDbg starting on pid 0x8 First chance exception: page fault on read access to 0x02af1d74 in 32-bit code (0x00403f0e). Register dump: