similar to: [LLVMdev] Bug in MachineInstr::isIdenticalTo

On Jan 4, 2011, at 11:08 AM, Villmow, Micah wrote: > I have ran across a case where the function isIdenticalTo is return true for instructions that are not equivalent. The instructions in question are load/store instructions, and is causing a problem with MachineBranchFolding. The problem is this, I have two branches of a switch statement that are identical, except for the size of the store.

Dear All, I am analysing some data for a colleague (not my data, gotta be published so I cannot divulge). My response variable is the number of matings observed per day for some fruitlies. My factors are: Day: the observations were taken on 9 days Regime: 3 selection regimes Line: 3 replicates per selection regime. I have 81 observations in total The lines are coded A to I, so I do not need

Is there any way to get printf type functionality inside the kernel from dtrace probes. Basically I want to dump progress through flow in my device driver. Something like: DTRACE_PRINTF("Inside chip reset, mailboxes %x %x %x %x %x %x %x %x", mb1, mb2, .....); ... ... DTRACE_PRINTF("reset failed: reason %s", failure_reasons[err]); I may have several such probes and they may

Hi, My MUA (claws-mail) is having a hard time listing directories for a mail account with two namespaces, one of which using mbox and the other one using maildir to store mails. Let's call the namespaces "#mbox." and "#maildir." and have "." as separator. Assume I have the following folder hierarchy: $namespace $namespace folder $namespace folder folder1a

On Jan 4, 2011, at 11:08 AM, Villmow, Micah wrote: > So, my question is, should isIdenticalTo take the memoperands into account? Is my patch correct? I almost feel like isIdenticalTo needs to be added to MachineMemOperand class. The MachineMemOperands are supposed to be used for optimizations only, your code should still be correct when stripping all memory operands. I think you would be

Dear all, I have just sent an email with my problem, but I think no one can see the red part, beacuse it is black. So, i am writing again the codes: rm(list=ls()) #remove almost everything in the memory set.seed(180185) nsim <- 10 mresultx <- matrix(-99, nrow=1000, ncol=nsim) mresultb <- matrix(-99, nrow=1000, ncol=nsim) N <- 200 I <- 5 taus <- c(0.480:0.520) h <-

I am having trouble predicting new data with a model created from package mboost: > mb1<-glmboost(as.formula(formula1),data=data_train,control=boost_control(mstop=400,nu=.1)) > f.predict<-predict(mb1,newdata=data_train) Error in scale.default(X, center = cm, scale = FALSE) : length of 'center' must equal the number of columns of 'x' Ultimately I want to predict

Dear list, Given a linear mixed model (from lme4) I want to 1) first change the input dataset and then 2) change the model formula. I want this to happen in a function call; Please see below. Options 1) and 2) below work whereas 3) fails with the message > foo() Error in is.data.frame(data) : object 'beets2' not found Question: What is it one must to in case 3) to have R look

Hi, I have just set up a new dovecot server with Dovecot 2.2.5. When I create a new user and try to authenticate I get the following error Sep 03 14:33:38 imap(test2): Error: user test2: Initialization failed: Initializing mail storage from mail_location setting failed: mkdir(/home/user/apps/var/mail/imap/test2/mailboxes) failed: Permission denied (euid=503(imapd) egid=503(imapd) missing +w

Hi, I have some problems with my repeated measures analysis. When I compute it with SPSS I get different results than with R. Probably I am doing something wrong in R. I have two groups (1,2) both having to solve a task under two conditions (1,2). That is one between subject factor (group) and one within subject factor (task). I tried the following: aov(Score

Hi! I recently setup a second with replication to the other. Both machines run ubuntu 12.04 with dovecot 2.2.13 (6bb26098a45c). All users mail accounts are currently synced manually to the first (mb1) using a dsync script, they are synchronised from a cyrus imap server. Users are still logging into the cyrus server. It appears that the only accounts that are replicated are ones who have

Dear all, I am trying to run a loop in my codes, but the software returns an error: "subscript out of bounds" I dont understand exactly why this is happenning. My codes are the following: rm(list=ls()) #remove almost everything in the memory set.seed(180185) nsim <- 10 mresultx <- matrix(-99, nrow=1000, ncol=nsim) mresultb <- matrix(-99, nrow=1000, ncol=nsim) N

Gee, it's been a while since I posted a new version of winetricks. This is rather a big update. As always, online at http://kegel.com/wine/winetricks Please submit bug reports to http://code.google.com/p/winezeug/issues/list svn log since version 20081127: r264 | daniel.r.kegel | 2009-01-16 Don't set winver to win2K when installing .net 1.1. r263 | daniel.r.kegel | 2009-01-16 Add

Hi, I'm trying to cross compile R260 in a ubuntu 6.06 linux. I downloaded the Makefile for 251 and simply replaced the R version by 260. However I'm getting an error about mingw. ernesto at gandalf:~/ipimar/devel/R/ccompile260$ make R export

Hello, I can nolonger build R packages in R 2.6.0 (win xp). I get the error message 'sh' is not recognized as an internal or external command. In earlier versions of R I had no problems. Maybe that someone can help me with this. Jean-Paul Fox. C:\PROGRA~1\R\R-2.6.0\bin>Rcmd build --force --binary C:\Temp\R260\mlirt * checking for file

> -----Original Message----- > From: Jakob Stoklund Olesen [mailto:stoklund at 2pi.dk] > Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 11:55 AM > To: Villmow, Micah > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Bug in MachineInstr::isIdenticalTo > > > On Jan 4, 2011, at 11:08 AM, Villmow, Micah wrote: > > > So, my question is, should isIdenticalTo take the

On Mon, 11 May 2020 15:01:27 -0400 Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick at intel.com> wrote: > The VMD endpoint provides a real PCIe domain to the guest, including Please define VMD. I'm sure this is obvious to many, but I've had to do some research. The best TL;DR summary I've found is Keith's original commit 185a383ada2e adding the controller to Linux. If there's

Machine Instruction Bundle in LLVM Hi all, There have been quite a bit of discussions about adding machine instruction bundle to support VLIW targets. I have been pondering what the right representation should be and what kind of impact it might have on the LLVM code generator. I believe I have a fairly good plan now and would like to share with the LLVM community. Design Criteria 1. The

Hi Evan, I just read your proposal and the following discussion for VLIW support and want to share my experience of writing a VLIW back-end for LLVM. I would not integrate the packetizer into the register allocator super class since it would reduce the flexibility for the back-end developer to add some optimization passes after the packetizer. Instead, I would add the packetizer as a separate

Hi, I was running make fullcheck when I found something weird. After editing the *expect.meta files , make fullcheck ran all tests and said "All tests passed", but the output included this (this is the last tests from test_metaflac.sh) > [...] > test case60: --remove --block-type=PICTURE... OK > test case61: --import-picture-from... OK > test case62: