similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM on Windows MSVC 10

2010/12/31 Francois Pichet <pichet2000 at gmail.com>: > I don't normally build using nmake.. but I just tried and it worked 100% > here. > Are you sure you are using the trunk? > > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> I first sent this to the Clang dev list, but they told me to come here:

I don't normally build using nmake.. but I just tried and it worked 100% here. Are you sure you are using the trunk? On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com>wrote: > I first sent this to the Clang dev list, but they told me to come here: > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at

Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> writes: >>> I'm trying to build svn LLVM with Visual Studio 2010: >>> >>> cd build >>> cmake .. -G"NMake Makefiles" >>> nmake >>> >>> and several link steps fail due to a missing symbol: >>> >>> > LLVMX86CodeGen.lib(X86JITInfo.cpp.obj) : error

Hello, Following some recent messages about building with Visual Studio 2010, I have gotten most things to compile in release mode on 64b windows 7. (Mainly the few errors with 0 -> nullptr in the second argument of the pair constructor, and making an ECValue constructor public). I'm falling at the last hurdle though when it comes to the final link: 1>------ Build started: Project:

"Bill O'Hara" <billtohara at gmail.com> writes: > 1>LLVMX86CodeGen.lib(X86JITInfo.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved > external symbol X86CompilationCallback referenced in function "public: > virtual void (__cdecl*__cdecl > llvm::X86JITInfo::getLazyResolverFunction(void * (__cdecl*)(void > *)))(void)" (?getLazyResolverFunction at

Hi Morten, If you can make the VS2005 project files availiable on the net then I can test them as I have VS2005 now, so then with Chris'es okay then they could be distributed with LLVM. Thanks, Aaron ----- Original Message ----- From: "Morten Ofstad" <morten at hue.no> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Thursday, January 26,

Compiling llvm on a linux/amd64 box produces: home/rafael/dev/llvm/build/Debug/lib/LLVMX86.o: In function `_X86CompilationCallback': (.text+0x316fe): undefined reference to `_X86CompilationCallback2' /home/rafael/dev/llvm/build/Debug/lib/LLVMX86.o: In function `llvm::X86JITInfo::getLazyResolverFunction(void* (*)(void*))': /home/rafael/dev/llvm/cvs/lib/Target/X86/X86JITInfo.cpp:219:

Hi! We are running llvm jit x86 on MS Visual Studio 2005. It seems there is a bug in asm code in function X86CompilationCallback in file X86JITInfo.cpp. Current code sets stack pointer to invalid value in instruction "and esp, 16". Depending on current stack pointer value it sometimes overwrites ecx and edx registers with next three lines. We have fixed this problem by changing this

Hi all, I've encountered a couple of minor build issues on Solaris that have crept in since 2.5, fixes below: 1. In lib/Target/X86/X86JITInfo.cpp, there is: // Check if building with -fPIC #if defined(__PIC__) && __PIC__ && defined(__linux__) #define ASMCALLSUFFIX "@PLT" #else #define ASMCALLSUFFIX #endif Which causes a link failure due to the non-PLT

Hello again. I still think that you are wrong. Realignement with and esp,-16 not always changes stack poiner. If esp is already aligned to 16 byte boundary, it will not change! Take a look at following example. Assume esp has value 0x000001000 at start of X86CompilationCallback function. Then execution of it will yield following esp values: 0x000000FFC - after push ebp 0x000000FFC - after mov

2011/1/5 Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es>: > Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> writes: > >> Yeah that's the two different ones I mean. Everything MS (intrinsics, >> language features etc...) is purely version-bound, so I don't even get >> why CMake insists on checking every known function prototype of for >> example "recv"

Hello, Nathan > or if it should be a configure test, which might be safer. Are there > any x86 platforms (other than apple) that don't need PLT-indirect calls? Yes, mingw. However just tweaking the define is not enough - we're not loading address of GOT into ebx before the call (on 32 bit ABIs) thus the call will be to nowhere. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of

Hello > We are running llvm jit x86 on MS Visual Studio 2005. It seems there > is a bug in asm code in function X86CompilationCallback in file > X86JITInfo.cpp. Current code sets stack pointer to invalid value in > instruction "and   esp,  16". Depending on current stack pointer value > it sometimes overwrites ecx and edx registers with next three lines. How so? The stack

On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> wrote: > You're welcome! Please remember that MinGW-w64 does not mean it is 64-bit. > It provides both 32- and 64-bit headers/libs. The "w64" in the name was > originally because that was the project's principal goal, among extending > the API completeness and compatibility with MSVC.

Whoops, phone rang and I forgot to cc to the list before I typed the message. ----- Forwarded Message ---- > From: Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> > To: Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> > Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 3:38:21 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] include/Config/config.h discrepancies between CMake and >autofoo builds > > > >

The patch I recently attached to bug 2606, reproduced here, is my first attempt to solve this issue as represented by the attached test cases. To solve the foreign Module GlobalVariable problem, I modified JIT::getOrEmitGlobalVariable(...) to directly attempt to map a found "external" GlobalVariable. To solve the foreign Module Function problem, I modified both JIT.{h,cpp} and

OK, fixed the problem with the intrin.h header that doesn't exist in previous versions of VS... -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: JIT.patch URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20060126/7e55b0d0/attachment.ksh>

On 19/08/2009, at 4:00 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Hello, Nathan > >> or if it should be a configure test, which might be safer. Are there >> any x86 platforms (other than apple) that don't need PLT-indirect >> calls? > Yes, mingw. However just tweaking the define is not enough - we're not Ok, so configure might be the way to go then, maybe something

On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> wrote: > When building LLVM/Clang, I get the following build failure: > > MinGW-w64 provides the necessary typedefs and declarations. I adjusted the > ifdef's to include a check for a the MinGW-w64-specific symbol of choice to > differentiate mingw.org vs mingw-w64. Tested on i686-w64-mingw32 and

2011/10/6 Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com> > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Ruben Van Boxem > <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> wrote: > > You're welcome! Please remember that MinGW-w64 does not mean it is > 64-bit. > > It provides both 32- and 64-bit headers/libs. The "w64" in the name was > > originally because that was the