similar to: [LLVMdev] Sparc back end fix

Hi Tim, Thanks for the patch. I had a few questions though - just to make sure that I get the problem correctly. Currently, here is your flow, as I understand it : x86 llvm-gcc binary llc -march=sparc gcc cross/sparc source ---------------------> .bc ------------------> .s -----------------> sparc executable. Is this correct? Or did you manage to build the

Hi everyone, I'm trying to make a cross-compiler based on llvm to target sparc (solaris) from x86_64 (linux). I couldn't compile llvm-gcc on my system so have to use the precompiled binaries from the website, but already have a gcc cross-compiler so can use this. So far, my compilation steps are these: 1) Preprocess the (C) sources using gcc cross-compiler 2) Use llvm-gcc to

I've recently played with the GCC implementation of pointer checker on a real hardware, my recent impressions are here: https://github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/AddressSanitizerIntelMemoryProtectionExtensions (there is also some old pre-hardware content). In short, I totally agree with what David says above: MPX is a disaster. (Usual disclaimer: my opinion here is too biased) I am glad

On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: > Patrick, > > On Jul 20, 2010, at 1:18 AM, Patrick Simmons wrote: >> It is open-source and redistributable, and I have added LICENSE.TXT >> files to all the pieces I want to merge.  These are blackscholes, >> canneal, dedup, fluidanimate, freqmine, streamcluster, and swaptions.  I >>

From here: http://parsec.cs.princeton.edu It is open-source and redistributable, and I have added LICENSE.TXT files to all the pieces I want to merge. These are blackscholes, canneal, dedup, fluidanimate, freqmine, streamcluster, and swaptions. I will disable the tests by default on the initial merge and test thoroughly on Linux and MacOS before enabling them. May I please commit my

On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 6:27 AM, Dmitrii Kuvaiskii < Dmitrii.Kuvaiskii at tu-dresden.de> wrote: > I continue playing with Intel MPX and its support in modern compilers. > All experiments were done on the Alienware (Dell) 15 R2, Ubuntu 15.10 > (linux 4.2.0), gcc version is 5.2.1, icc version 2016.1.150. The > benchmark suite is PARSEC 3.0, all versions with 1 thread and default

Hello, even though the study of Intel MPX took much longer than expected, we have finally finished it. Currently, it is published in two formats: * as a technical report: https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.00719 * and as a webpage: https://intel-mpx.github.io/ This work contains evaluation of MPX from perspectives of performance (Phoenix, PARSEC, and SPEC benchmark suites), security (RIPE and found

Patrick, On Jul 20, 2010, at 1:18 AM, Patrick Simmons wrote: > It is open-source and redistributable, and I have added LICENSE.TXT > files to all the pieces I want to merge. These are blackscholes, > canneal, dedup, fluidanimate, freqmine, streamcluster, and swaptions. I > will disable the tests by default on the initial merge and test > thoroughly on Linux and MacOS before

On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:57 AM, John Criswell <criswell at uiuc.edu> wrote: > Daniel Dunbar wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> Patrick, >>> >>> On Jul 20, 2010, at 1:18 AM, Patrick Simmons wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> It is open-source and

On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 4:59 AM, Dmitrii Kuvaiskii < Dmitrii.Kuvaiskii at tu-dresden.de> wrote: > >> Recently I played with MPX support on Intel C/C++ Compiler (icc). This > >> implementation looks *much* better, with the following example > >> overheads: 1.2X on "raytrace", 1.25X on "bodytrack", 1.08X on > >> "streamcluster".

Daniel Dunbar wrote: > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: > >> Patrick, >> >> On Jul 20, 2010, at 1:18 AM, Patrick Simmons wrote: >> >>> It is open-source and redistributable, and I have added LICENSE.TXT >>> files to all the pieces I want to merge. These are blackscholes, >>> canneal,

Hi all, I have successfully built LLVM itself, as all the tools (llc et al) are working fine. I built the latest release version (2.7). I have been trying to build the llvm-gcc frontend on a sparc machine. I encountered the following issues : 1) During configuration, the default assembler (installed at /usr/ccs/bin) is chosen to be used, but I want to use the GNU assembler (installed at

It's not *that* big. The patch is 634K uncompressed. I'd say it would be annoying to have that attached to an email message, but it's no bigger than existing MultiSource tests. --Patrick On 07/21/2010 08:13 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:57 AM, John Criswell<criswell at uiuc.edu> wrote: > >> Daniel Dunbar wrote: >>

Dmitrii, all, Please note, that GCC 5.3 had a significant update to the MPX code quality - please, use this version as reference. Regards, Sergos On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 12:49 AM, Kostya Serebryany via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Feb

Hello all, I am trying to modify the Sparc backend to do something for my team's project, to do the following. Whenever the backend encounters a call to one particular type of function names (functions like p0(), p1()..etc), I want the backend to generate a "sethi %g0, <number>", and NOT a "call p0, call p1..." instruction. However, the backend should work as usual

On 1/20/11 12:27 PM, Venkatraman Govindaraju wrote: Just out of curiosity, have either of you considered writing an LLVM transform that simply replaces these call instructions with inline assembly code that does what you want? If that works, it seems much simpler than modifying/enhancing the code generator. -- John T. > I have similar requirements for my project. This is what I do. >

Hi, I was wondering if there's a way in R to open a web browser (such as Internet Explorer, or Firefox or whatever). I'm doing some analyses that have associated urls, and it would be nice to have the ability to directly open the relevant page from within R. I was looking at the help for 'url' and I can see I can probably access the information I need and display it in my

On Sep 26, 2010, at 3:23 PMPDT, Raghu Prabhakar wrote: > 1) During configuration, the default assembler (installed at /usr/ccs/bin) is chosen to be used, but I want to use the GNU assembler (installed at /vm/GNU/bin in my machine). In spite of re-arranging paths on the PATH variable, and even after removing /usr/ccs/bin from PATH, configure still chooses the default assembler itself. Is there

I have similar requirements for my project. This is what I do. 1. Add a new intrinsic function to LLVM that corresponds to "functions with particular type of function names". The steps to create intrinsic function is documented in http://llvm.org/docs/ExtendingLLVM.html#intrinsic. 2. Create a lowering pass that lowers "functions with particular type" ( eg. p0, p1) to

For my case, I can't replace these call instructions with inline assembly code because I need to encode the registers into the "number". For instance, if the call instruction is %result = call i32 @foo(i32 %a) and the result is assigned to register %l0 and the variable "a" to register %l1, then I encode all foo, %l0 and %l1 and generate a sethi instruction. thanks,