similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM test-suite support for dragonegg / Fortran

Hi Tobias, > I am very interested in using dragonegg as a fortran frontend for the LLVM test > suite, as a start to improve fortran support. > > I believe this should be easy, but when I looked into this I had the impression > the nightly tester in the llvm test-suite does not even support dragonegg for > the C/C++ part. Is this true or did I miss something? this is true. >

On 11/08/2010 03:18 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Tobias, > >> I am very interested in using dragonegg as a fortran frontend for the >> LLVM test >> suite, as a start to improve fortran support. >> >> I believe this should be easy, but when I looked into this I had the >> impression >> the nightly tester in the llvm test-suite does not even support

Hi Tobias, > I committed an extended version of that patch to llvm core and the test suite. > Can you have a look, if it works for you. if I configure like this then the configure script thinks llvm-gcc is not dragonegg: configure --with-llvmgcc="gcc-4.5 -fplugin=path/dragonegg.so" --with-llvmgxx="g++-4.5 -fplugin=path/dragonegg.so" There are several reasons for

On 11/12/2010 12:11 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Tobias, > >> I committed an extended version of that patch to llvm core and the >> test suite. >> Can you have a look, if it works for you. > > if I configure like this then the configure script thinks llvm-gcc is not > dragonegg: > > configure --with-llvmgcc="gcc-4.5 -fplugin=path/dragonegg.so" >

hi, I have dragonegg r131864, gcc-4.5 r174052 and llvm r131897. When i tried to make the llvm test-suite, i got a error message: /home/ether/local/gcc-4.5/bin/gcc -fplugin=/home/ether/sources/dragonegg/dragonegg.so -I/home/ether/build/llvm-ts/projects/test-suite/SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE -I/home/ether/sources/llvm/projects/test-suite/SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE

Hi ether, > I have dragonegg r131864, gcc-4.5 r174052 and llvm r131897. When i > tried to make the llvm test-suite, i got a error message: ... > cc1: error: invalid option '-fplugin-arg-dragonegg-disable-llvm-optzns' > cc1: error: Fail to initialize plugin /home/ether/sources/dragonegg/dragonegg.so this is my fault: you now need to use

I'm not certain yet which commit in the last couple of days caused this, but the current llvm/dragonegg svn shows a major improvement in the runtime of the xplor-nih testsuite when xplor-nih is built with FSF gcc 4.6.1 and the dragonegg plugin at -O3 -ffast-math -funroll-loops. Previously the xplor-nih testsuite always executed in ~40 sec but now it is coming it at 34.5 sec which is about the

Try -mllvm -disable-unroll-scev if you're curious. There can be some luck involved. If you have the bitcode for the important function, I may be able to convert it into a test case to avoid regressing. I usually grab the unoptimized bitcode as follows: -emit-llvm -mllvm -disable-llvm-optzns -o module.bc -Andy On Sep 6, 2011, at 12:03 PM, Owen Anderson wrote: > Seems very likely to be

Duncan, Is this expected for x86_64-apple-darwin12 under Xcode 5? Using current llvm/compiler-rt/clang/polly/testsuite with dragonegg 3.4 branch, I see the warnings... % /sw/lib/gcc4.8/bin/gcc-4 -fplugin=/sw/lib/gcc4.8/lib/dragonegg.so -specs=/sw/lib/gcc4.8/lib/integrated-as.specs -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-enable-gcc-optzns -Ofast himenoBMTxpa.c himenoBMTxpa.c: In function ‘main’:

Seems very likely to be related to Andy's SCEV-unroll-loops changes. --Owen On Sep 6, 2011, at 11:56 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > I'm not certain yet which commit in the last couple of days caused this, > but the current llvm/dragonegg svn shows a major improvement in the runtime > of the xplor-nih testsuite when xplor-nih is built with FSF gcc 4.6.1 and the > dragonegg plugin

On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:38:48AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:38:21AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>> On 10/20/2012 05:38 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>>> Duncan, >>>> Is the documentation for using Polly support in dragonegg correct? I built llvm/polly/dragonegg

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 07:37:46PM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote: > Duncan, > Is this expected for x86_64-apple-darwin12 under Xcode 5? Using current > llvm/compiler-rt/clang/polly/testsuite with dragonegg 3.4 branch, I see > the warnings... > > % /sw/lib/gcc4.8/bin/gcc-4 -fplugin=/sw/lib/gcc4.8/lib/dragonegg.so -specs=/sw/lib/gcc4.8/lib/integrated-as.specs

On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:01:37AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 10/21/2012 10:57 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:38:48AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>> On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:38:21AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>>>> On 10/20/2012 05:38 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:

On 10/21/2012 10:57 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:38:48AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >> On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:38:21AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>>> On 10/20/2012 05:38 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>>>> Duncan, >>>>> Is the documentation for using Polly

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 03:40:00PM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Jack, > > On 23/05/13 15:37, Jack Howarth wrote: >> Below are the results for the Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks compiled with llvm/compiler-rt/dragonegg 3.3svn at r182439 against current >> FSF gcc 4.7.3svn and 4.8.1svn. The only major bug remaining in the dragonegg 3.3svn support for gcc 4.8.x is

On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:38:21AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >> On 10/20/2012 05:38 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>> Duncan, >>> Is the documentation for using Polly support in dragonegg correct? I built llvm/polly/dragonegg >>> using the documentation at

On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 02:35:49PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:01:37AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: > > On 10/21/2012 10:57 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > >> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:38:48AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: > >>> On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > >>>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:38:21AM -0700, Tobias

On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:38:21AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 10/20/2012 05:38 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> Duncan, >> Is the documentation for using Polly support in dragonegg correct? I built llvm/polly/dragonegg >> using the documentation at http://polly.llvm.org/example_load_Polly_into_dragonegg.html >> with... >> >> GCC=/sw/lib/gcc4.7/bin/gcc-4

Hi Jack, thanks for these numbers. > With the commit from http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20121203/158488.html, > the Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks complete again on x86_64-apple-darwin12. The result are similar to what > were seen with FSF gcc 4.6.2svn and llvm/dragonegg 3.0 (which was the last release that passed pb05) >

Duncan, With the commit from http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20121203/158488.html, the Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks complete again on x86_64-apple-darwin12. The result are similar to what were seen with FSF gcc 4.6.2svn and llvm/dragonegg 3.0 (which was the last release that passed pb05) http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2011-October/044091.html. Jack