similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm autoconf using LLVM_SRC_ROOT?

Hi I am trying to create a new LLVM project that uses autoconf to configure it. the example requires me to define * LLVM_SRC_ROOT - The root of the LLVM source tree. * LLVM_OBJ_ROOT - The root of the LLVM object tree Is this required? Why? I just want to use the libraries that were installed using Ubuntu 10.04. I can compile programs using llvmc $ llvmc --version Low Level

On Nov 4, 2010, at 7:35 PM, Shaun savage wrote: > I am trying to create a new LLVM project that uses autoconf to configure it. > > the example requires me to define > > • LLVM_SRC_ROOT - The root of the LLVM source tree. > • LLVM_OBJ_ROOT - The root of the LLVM object tree > Is this required? Why? I just want to use the libraries that were installed using Ubuntu

On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Reid Spencer wrote: > isn't necessarily tied to LLVM. Anyway, lets cross that bridge when we > get there. Sounds good. -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/

Personally, I don't think LLVM projects should need much in the way of autoconf stuff. They certainly don't need to replicate things like install-sh and mkinstalldirs. I'd vote for taking these out of the projects rather than making the makefiles deal with them. I think in most cases these are just historical artifacts that have been with the projects since long before the new

Hi! In current LLVM CVS: llvm/projects/Stacker/Makefile.common.in llvm/projects/sample/Makefile.common.in llvm-java/llvm-java/Makefile.common.in have line: include $(LLVM_OBJ_ROOT)/Makefile.common that have line: include $(LLVM_OBJ_ROOT)/Makefile.config (also $(LLVM_OBJ_ROOT)/Makefile.config used in llvm-test/Makefile.config.in) and llvm/Makefile.config.in have lines: INSTALL_SH :=

On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 20:53, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Reid Spencer wrote: > > > Personally, I don't think LLVM projects should need much in the way of > > autoconf stuff. They certainly don't need to replicate things like > > install-sh and mkinstalldirs. I'd vote for taking these out of the > > projects rather than making the makefiles

On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Reid Spencer wrote: > Personally, I don't think LLVM projects should need much in the way of > autoconf stuff. They certainly don't need to replicate things like > install-sh and mkinstalldirs. I'd vote for taking these out of the > projects rather than making the makefiles deal with them. I think in > most cases these are just historical artifacts

I need some help getting a system running for one of my company's plants. I am running AsteriskNow 1.7 with Asterisk 1.6.2.10 and FreePBX 2.8.0.2. My D-Channel keeps bouncing. The telecom tech told me he thought that I might be using the wrong sync source, and I think I might have been, but I changed DAHDI system.conf to "span=1,1,0,ESF,B8ZS" (from

Index: MultiSource/Benchmarks/Bullet/Makefile =================================================================== --- MultiSource/Benchmarks/Bullet/Makefile (revision 92478) +++ MultiSource/Benchmarks/Bullet/Makefile (working copy) @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ LEVEL = ../../../ PROG = bullet -CPPFLAGS += -Iinclude -DNO_TIME +CPPFLAGS += -I$(PROJ_SRC_DIR)/include -DNO_TIME LDFLAGS = -lstdc++ include

Hello, My partner and I am making a small app needs to access a C++ library from the LLVM 2.5 JIT. We've made sure that there are no classes and have put 'extern "c"' in front of the functions we need to access. In order to make this work, we seem to need to have a bitcode version of libstdc++ so we can avoid writing our own implementations of std::string and std::vector.

A recent post suggested using the Fedora packaging to get the separate RPMs to build for Redhat. I gave that a try but am getting the following error when doing so on a Redhat 9 system: make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/samba-3.0.21b/source' rm -f /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/samba-3.0.21b/source/include/includes.h.gch gcc -I. -I/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/samba-3.0.21b/source -O2 -g

On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Samuel Crow<samuraileumas at yahoo.com> wrote: > Hello, > > My partner and I am making a small app needs to access a C++ library from the LLVM 2.5 JIT.  We've made sure that there are no classes and have put 'extern "c"' in front of the functions we need to access.  In order to make this work, we seem to need to have a bitcode

Hi Justin No i did a test setup after getting to it in real life. In this test setup: - rsync (daemonless) is run - ctrl-c, - results are checked, - dest directory is deleted and so on. in 50 % the file is left over. i can reproduce it on a big fat slow (relative to a small ext4 partition on same lvm) xfs-partition. If i do this on root I even if I manage tp ctrl-c at the right time, I

Hello all, I've been peacefully using Samba 3 for about 3 years now, and it has done a wonderful job in my little world as domain member servers for file and print serving. Much bettetrver farms that some of my peers in the company are using. So I want to try Samba 4 and see if I can play with making it my PDC. The only problem is that when I go to make, I receive the following error: ...

Hi, I have a number of issues compiling samba 3.4.0pre1 using makerpms.sh, under the RHEL folder in packaging. 1) samba.spec refers to 'source' when the folder has been renamed to 'source3' (easy enough to amend) which made it fail very early on. 2) Following that - (apologies in advance, if I have gone over the top in pasting output), it seems to be complaining about missing

----- Original Message ---- > From: Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> > To: Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> > Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 3:49:01 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] accessing a bitcode library exported from C++ using the JIT > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Samuel

Hi folks, man page says "By default, rsync will delete any partially transferred file if the transfer is interrupted" I have (reproducible) a partial file left, if I do CTRL-C source-dir: mounted LVM XFS dest-dir: see source-dir Ubuntu 12.04.1 (LTS) kernel 3.2.0-39-generic command: rsync -a

Dear list, Tadashi Kadowaki has developed a pdf device package that allows to add hyperlinks and popups to (currently) text, mtext and rect calls. The package passes R CMD check (minor warnings) and compiles on MacOS X and GNU/Linux, but we do not succeed in building the package for Windows. The current version of the package can be checked out as svn checkout

Here's a configure check to see if socklen_t is defined. Even though my man pages on linux say accept(2) takes (int *) as it's 3rd arg, the sys/socket.h files begs to differ. If not defined (which is doesn't seem to be on AIX 4.2.1), it can be explicitly typedef'ed to (unsigned int). Now do mainstream code changes get submitted back to the openbsd group, or would it be better to

On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: >> LLVM tools and LLVM-GCC I've built seem to work. >> Can it be due to LLVM_SRC_ROOT == LLVM_OBJ_ROOT? > No. This is usually due to absence of llvm-gcc. You need reconfigure > llvm once again with lvm-gcc path added and make sure it was hooked > properly (look into