similar to: [LLVMdev] DebugInfo: seg fault

I get the filename and directory from DISubprogram from reading llvm.dbg.sp and use that to DIBuiler::.createCompileUnit. This leads to "duplicate symbol" error from llc. >>> You need to call di.createCompileUnit() once for your translation unit in the beginning. You don't need to keep track of CU yourself. DIBuilder will take care of it. After words, you can call

On Mar 29, 2011, at 8:23 AM, Vedavyas Duggirala wrote: >>>> I am adding local var to existing IR with debug info. I am not using >>>> the Pass infrastructure. >>>> >>>> void InsertDbg(AllocaInst *i, StringRef varname, Instruction, inserbefore) >>>> { >>>> >>>> DIBuilder di(*module); >>>> cu =

Hi, > You need to call di.createCompileUnit() once for your translation unit in the beginning. You don't need to keep track of CU yourself. DIBuilder will take care of it. After words, you can call di.createBasicType(..) and it will work. Actually it doesn't. But if I call di.createCompileUnit(file, dir, producer, ...) with file or dir different from that of CU already in the file,

>>> I am  adding local var to existing IR with debug info. I am not using >>> the Pass infrastructure. >>> >>> void InsertDbg(AllocaInst *i, StringRef varname, Instruction, inserbefore) >>> { >>> >>> DIBuilder di(*module); >>> cu = di.createCU        / * How do I get the MDNode of  already in the >>> IR . Instead of

>>> I get the filename and directory from  DISubprogram from reading >>> llvm.dbg.sp and use >>> that to DIBuiler::.createCompileUnit. This  leads to  "duplicate >>> symbol" error from llc. >> If the llvm::Module already has llvm.dbg.sp then you don't need to use DIBuilder::createCompileUnit(). The point, I am missing is how did you get

[Forgot to cc list.] Begin forwarded message: > From: Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> > Date: March 29, 2011 4:41:30 PM PDT > To: Vedavyas Duggirala <vduggira at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Accessing metadata & creating DIVariable > > > On Mar 29, 2011, at 4:29 PM, Vedavyas Duggirala wrote: > >>>> I get the filename and directory

On Mar 29, 2011, at 11:18 AM, Vedavyas Duggirala wrote: > Hi, > >> You need to call di.createCompileUnit() once for your translation unit in the beginning. You don't need to keep track of CU yourself. DIBuilder will take care of it. After words, you can call di.createBasicType(..) and it will work. > > Actually it doesn't. But if I call di.createCompileUnit(file, dir,

Hello all, Summary & Context: ------------------------------- I am starting to write a front-end for some domain specific programming languages. Code generation seems to be working fine. However, I am having trouble generating debug info, to be used by gdb. The problem: -------------------- I generate a foo.ll file, that is later compiled into an executable foo. The foo.ll file I

Hi, How can I dynamically change the code generation optimization level (e.g., None) of a JIT in other to recompile a function with a new optimization level (e.g., Default)? Thank you. Best regards, Nurudeen.

Hi, I would like to understand why calling a native function from a function in LLVM IR can be much faster than calling an equivalent function in LLVM IR. For instance, here are two equivalent programs. The first calls an llvm function while the second calls a native function. On my AMD machine, the first takes 4.48s to run while the second takes 3.49s. define i64 @bloop() { entry: br label

Hi, I've just about got myself transferred from windowsXP to Linux (Mepis 3.3.1-1). I've got R 2.1.1, emacs, and ess running from the debian repositories. Of course, there is a hitch. I have a bit of C code in one of my personal functions. I have, apparently without problem, been able to compile it using R CMD SHLIB, but when I try to dyn.load it I get the following error: >

Hi, I have a question regarding the metadata for compileunit debug info. I find a few things in it a bit strange, but maybe there it is a reason for it to be that way that I just don't understand (but if that is the case I guess the documentation needs to be clearer). Consider this C program: "int X;" Compiled with "clang -g" it debug metadata along these lines:

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org>wrote: > On 18 February 2011 21:34, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > > Sorry, I meant DIBuilder. > > DIBuilder is the new DIFactory. I've been playing with it this week > and it's much easier and straightforward to use. I'm still having > problems to create arrays, though.

I'm trying to write a llvm pass to add debug info into a non-debug-info bitcode file. I have been read http://llvm.org/docs/SourceLevelDebugging.html. And I use DIBuilder to produce the debug metadata. I know I can't get all information form ir code . So I add some manual info as test data. After executing my pass, I can find debug info metadata in my generated bitcode. Those metadata

Hi Chenwj, Thank you for your response. The problem with this approach is that global mappings have to be recreated in the new JIT. Can this be somehow avoided? Best regards, Nurudeen. On Thu, March 22, 2012 10:15 pm, 陳韋任 wrote: >> How can I dynamically change the code generation optimization level >> (e.g., >> None) of a JIT in other to recompile a function with a new

Hi, I would like to eliminate all the load instructions and replace their uses with the stored values in the following program. The stores and loads are in the same basic block. Is there an optimization pass in LLVM 3.0 that can do this? define void @testFunc() { entry: %sVal = alloca %sTy %f1 = getelementptr %sTy* %sVal, i32 0, i32 0 store i32 789, i32* %f1 %f2 = getelementptr %sTy*

Hi Óscar, Thank you for your response. I did not explicitly optimize the IR. I compile and run the two versions with ... GenericValue gv = EE->runFunction(bsqr, args); ... GenericValue gv2 = EE->runFunction(cppnat, args); I am calling method runFunction of ExecutionEngine. I am using the default code gen optimization level. Best regards, Nurudeen. On Thu, March 28, 2013 7:05 am, Óscar

Hi LLVMdevs, I am trying to get the runtime values of variables (parameters and local variables) in a function running in JIT mode. I generated intrinsic calls to obtain the values of some variables as shown in the definition below. define void @foo(i32 %arg1) { entry: %X = alloca i32, !dbg !3 store i32 21, i32* %X, !dbg !3 %Y = alloca i32, !dbg !3 store i32 22, i32* %Y, !dbg !3

Dear R-devel, Apologies for sending what is probably a very simple question to R-devel: I am definitely missing something very simple and can't work out what it is. I've been trying to find the problem here for about a month and need some help! I am trying to work out how to run a C program from an R script. Rather than try the C program directly, I'm trying to get a much simpler

> On 2015-Jan-19, at 12:38, Frédéric Riss <friss at apple.com> wrote: > > >> On Jan 19, 2015, at 12:04 PM, Christian Schafmeister <chris.schaf at verizon.net> wrote: >> >> >> I forgot to mention this in my initial email. >> >> The build of LLVM that I was using was commit a0d5d7aed8e177cea381b3d054d80c212ece9f2c >> The date on the