similar to: [LLVMdev] address-units

DiBcom (http://www.dibcom.com) is a company designing chipsets in the field of digital TV reception. The "DSP" team, in charge of the LLVM/CLANG based compilation chain, as well as the cpu design, is hiring. Beside participating to the toolchain development and deployment, you will also be part of the improvement process, by proposing efficient coding style for the dsp firmware or

Ooops, you are right. Just forgot to CC the mailing list. Thanks for noticing it,, -- Arnaud de Grandmaison ________________________________________ From: Damien Vincent [damien.llvm at gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2011 3:57 AM To: Arnaud Allard de Grandmaison Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Hazard recognizers & basic blocks Merci ! I was also planning to add a second pass to verify these

On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:19 AM, Arnaud Allard de Grandmaison <Arnaud.AllardDeGrandMaison at dibcom.com> wrote: >> But if the usage was in a loop it would be better (at the cost of >> register pressure) to materialise 5 into a register outside of the >> loop and use the register repeatedly in the loop. > > Bouncing on this subject: you can not know before isel is

On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Arnaud Allard de Grandmaison <Arnaud.AllardDeGrandMaison at dibcom.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > The IndVarSimplify pass seems to be too aggressive when it enlarge the induction variable type ; this can pessimize the generated code when the new induction variable size is not natively supported by the target. This is probably not an issue for x86_64,

Hi Arnaud, That sounds great. I look forward to seeing a patch. You may also look forward to big performance improvements in the PBQP allocator: I'm working on updates which will improve compile speeds and massively reduce memory use. Regards, Lang. On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Arnaud Allard de Grandmaison < Arnaud.AllardDeGrandMaison at dibcom.com> wrote: > > I also

Attached is a small patch to allow users of the PBQP allocator to optionally insert a custom pass. I believe it can be usefull to other users of the pbqp. I used it to undo some of the coalescer work, and make sure that I have different virtual registers, inserting a copy if necessary, to build a pair. I noticed an unexpected --- to me at least --- behaviour of the allocator. I have some

Thanks Eli, After digging thru mail archives & bugzilla, it seems fixing properly this issue would require a major change in the selectionDAG code --- to have it operate on a per function basis instead of per basic-block. This however, does not seem to be the only issue. The following C code does not produce an efficicient assembly sequence either. extern void f(unsigned long long v); void

On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 7:38 AM, Julien Schmitt <jschmitt at dibcom.fr> wrote: > Dear LLVMer ; > > i'm trying to use LLVM for a specific target, using different memory banks. > I have written the frontend to generate a valid IR and want to use the > existing passes (as defined in tool opt) to optimize the code. > > The target has specific instructions, so following

Christian, Thanks for your reply and the wiki entry. I did search the archives, but evidently I didn't search for the right thing. My bad. Anyways, I am still wondering about the other part of my question. Why aren't there Tablegen backends specific to some architecture backends? Let me describe a different scenario. Suppose my architecture has vector and scalar units, and suppose I want

Thanks for the suggestions. It looks like Duncan's suggestion got me a step closer, but I still can't build llvm-gcc... On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Christian Sayer <Christian.Sayer at dibcom.fr> wrote: > did you try a simple > > $ ../llvm-2.5/configure --prefix=/pkg/bin/llvm/ > CC=/pkg/bin/gcc-4.2.4/bin/gcc CXX=/pkg/bin/gcc-4.2.4/bin/g++ Tried that, same error.

> > At first I thought this could be handled when lowering > loads and stores, but I realize that I can only catch the > targeted addresses of loads/stores here - however address > calculation nodes may occur anywhere in a DAG. > > > > So my first impulse would be to adjust the constants when > the GEP instructions are transformed to ADDs. Afaics his > would mean

On 2015-01-22 22:41, Michael Williamson wrote: > Hi, Hello, > > OK. I tried your suggestion. I modified the dovecot config file > "10-logging.conf", like so: > > log_path = syslog > > and > > mail_debug = yes > You could set syslog_facility = local5 and have all the log messages in the messages file. Also take a look at the logging dovecot wiki

Hi, OK. I tried your suggestion. I modified the dovecot config file "10-logging.conf", like so: log_path = syslog and mail_debug = yes It appears that the logging goes to "/var/log/maillog", not "messages" as I expected. Restarting service dovecot produces info in the "maillog" file showing the restart: ... Jan 22 15:20:14 coe dovecot: imap: Server

The LLVM Foundation is pleased to announce its new Board of Directors: Chandler Carruth Hal Finkel Arnaud de Grandmaison David Kipping Anton Korobeynikov Tanya Lattner Chris Lattner John Regehr Three new members and five continuing members were elected to the eight person board. The new board consists of individuals from corporations and from the academic and scientific communities. They also

Hi, I have two data frames (u and v). > u   coe      nam 1   0     Time 2   0    Poten 3   0   AdvExp 4   0    Share 5   0   Change 6   0 Accounts 7   0     Work 8   0   Rating > v       coeff    enter 1 0.7272727 Accounts 2 0.3211112     Time 3 0.0500123    Poten I want to update the values of coe in u by using the values ofcoeff in v. That is, I want to get the following result >

if((group_c = *lp_force_group(snum))) { BOOL is_guest = False; some lines deleted token = create_nt_token(uid, gid, current_user.ngroups,current_user.groups, is_guest); must_free_token = True; } set_sec_ctx(uid, gid, current_user.ngroups, current_user.groups,token); /* * Free the new token (as set_sec_ctx

If I try to do the following: /usr/local/samba/bin/pdbedit -a -u someusername -U 5000 This works as one would think, the account is created with a RID of 5000. But when I do: /usr/local/samba/bin/pdbedit -a -m -u somemachinename -U 3000 It does not work as you would think. The account is created but with the RID of the Unix UID*2+1000 not, a RID of 3000 as specificed on the command line. And

Greetings, We are having some rights issues on Samba 3.6.18 running on Slackware64 14.0 (the official Slackware Package). One of our users is having access issues and I believe I have traced the problem to the following entry in the log.smbd: Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups Issuing the groups command for this user returns the 8 Linux groups in which the user has

Greetings, Is it possible to use Samba 3.6.20 as a stand-alone server? We do not have any Windows servers, and we have no domain or AD. Our goal is to use Samba with the Linux (Unix) permissions and avoid using ACLs. Can this be done? If so, what lines in the smb.conf would control this? Thanks! Stu... -- Stuart Reedy Working hard for a great university! stu at coe.uky.edu

Hi, I try to minimize the sum of the sum of sce. The following program has been created but it only takes in consideration the last kinetic and not the first ones. I think that I have forget a subscrib but I don't know where. so if you can help me, it will be great.... I have try an other program where y and x are directly calculate in sce function but the time of