similar to: [LLVMdev] MAJOR API CHANGE: Pass initialization without static constructors

Forgot to reply to the list. -- John T. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] MAJOR API CHANGE: Pass initialization without static constructors Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 15:05:21 -0500 From: John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> To: Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> On 10/8/10 1:29 PM, Owen Anderson wrote: > Hello fellow LLVM-ers, > > As

On 10/8/10 3:15 PM, Owen Anderson wrote: > > On Oct 8, 2010, at 1:05 PM, John Criswell wrote: > >> On 10/8/10 1:29 PM, Owen Anderson wrote: >>> Hello fellow LLVM-ers, >>> >>> As those of you who follow llvm-commits have probably noticed, I've >>> been hard at work reworking our pass infrastructure to perform pass >>>

On Oct 8, 2010, at 1:05 PM, John Criswell wrote: > On 10/8/10 1:29 PM, Owen Anderson wrote: >> Hello fellow LLVM-ers, >> >> As those of you who follow llvm-commits have probably noticed, I've been hard at work reworking our pass infrastructure to perform pass initialization/registration without static constructors. This is a boon for clients of the LLVM libraries, as

On Oct 8, 2010, at 1:37 PM, John Criswell wrote: > On 10/8/10 3:15 PM, Owen Anderson wrote: >> >> On Oct 8, 2010, at 1:05 PM, John Criswell wrote: >> >>> On 10/8/10 1:29 PM, Owen Anderson wrote: >>>> Hello fellow LLVM-ers, >>>> >>>> As those of you who follow llvm-commits have probably noticed, I've been hard at work

John, On Oct 8, 2010, at 1:05 PM, John Criswell wrote: >> These initialization routines must be invoked before the PassManager will be able to resolve pipelines involving your pass. For convenience, LLVM now exposes per-library batch initialization routines, i.e. initializeScalarOpts(), which initialize all the passes within a given library in a single go. > > From an ease of

Dear All, What is the appropriate way to create analysis groups when using mainline LLVM? Following the directions in the "Writing an LLVM Pass" doesn't appear to work, and the INITIALIZE_ANALYSIS_GROUP() and INITIALIZE_AG_PASS() macros seem to each call a function defined by the other. -- John T.

On 10/8/10 3:44 PM, Owen Anderson wrote: > [snip] > >> Hrm. I see. >> >> I still don't like the idea of having every statically-linked tool explicitly initializing every library that gets linked in. Just dumping the library into the Makefile and being done with it was much nicer. >> >> If you can find a reasonable way to support that, it would be nice.

Hi Matthew, Did you add your alias analysis pass initializeEverythingMustAliasPass() into llvm::initializeAnalysis(PassRegistry &Registry) {} ? This will initialize it linked into the Analysis library. thanks, chen On Apr 28, 2014, at 8:43 PM, Jingyue Wu <jingyue at google.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Matthew O'Connor <thegreendragon at

Hi, I'm attempting to do some alias analysis & other memory inspection. I've written a pointless AliasAnalysis pass (that says everything must alias) to attempt to verify that my pass is getting picked up & run by opt. I run opt with: opt -load ~/Applications/llvm/lib/MustAA.so -must-aa -aa-eval -debug < trace0.ll I see my pass being initialized, but never being called (I see

Hi All Does anyone know any example compiler where it has vector/matrix as first class type like matlab using llvm? If not, does anyone have idea how that should be done on llvm? Thanks Leon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20101215/92febead/attachment.html>

Hi, In "Agilge Web Development With Rails" on page 217, an example of foreign keys is shown. I am however unable to find a definition of wheater the naming of the index is significant. On the above mentioned page, this line is shown in the example: constraint fk_items_product foreign key (product_id) references products(id) In "fk_items_product", "items" is

Hi everyone, I am wondering what is the right way to register an alias analysis pass. My alias analysis pass is implemented in a dynamic load module. As I can see, a general way to register a pass looks like: llvm::RegisterPass<Analyzer> X("rci", "RCI Pass"); However, registering a type-based analysis uses: INITIALIZE_AG_PASS(...) I think, registering an

Hello everyone, Till now I have succesfully running passes using RegisterPass template. I have encountered a segfault in my pass. Assertion `AA && "AA didn't call InitializeAliasAnalysis in its run method!"' failed. Then, I tried to use INITIALIZE_PASS_XXXX or INITIALIZE_AG_PASS template, together with `*llvm::createMyMemDepPrinter()` and

I added your suggestion and am using this now llvm::legacy::FunctionPassManager *functionPassManager = new llvm::legacy::FunctionPassManager(Mod); llvm::PassRegistry &registry = *llvm::PassRegistry::getPassRegistry(); initializeScalarOpts(registry); functionPassManager->add( new llvm::TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass(llvm::TargetLibraryInfoImpl(targetMachine->getTargetTriple())) );

Dear all, I wrote a machine function pass to run with llc. But I get this error while building: "/home/erdem/llvm/lib/CodeGen/CodeGen.cpp:80: error: undefined reference to 'llvm::initializeNoopInserterPass(llvm::PassRegistry&)'" NoopInserter is the name of my pass. I already added this line to InitializePasses.h: "void

I had INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN and INITIALIZE_PASS_END macros. I replaced them with INITIALIZE_PASS but I get the same error. If I understand correctly, I need to modify Passes.h, InitializePasses.h, and Codegen.cpp files to register my pass, right? Another question is: Is it necessary to have the createNoopInserterPass function? Erdem -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Hi everyone, I am wondering what is the right way to register an alias analysis pass. My alias analysis pass is implemented in a dynamic load module. As I can see, a general way to register a pass looks like: llvm::RegisterPass<Analyzer> X("rci", "RCI Pass"); However, registering a type-based analysis uses: INITIALIZE_AG_PASS(...) I think, registering an

I have two rails applications that modify/view the same data. Is there a DRY way of sharing a model (not just database) between two separate applications? -- Mike

I'm sorry, I don't know what you were looking for. The first 5 were scattered amidst different e-mails. The others have to do with following what "RAFast" and "RALinScan" as examples. It's a linker error, and I do not know why only opt and bugpoint does not compiler, and why llc does not show my reg alloc pass anymore. It worked before the API change e-mail was

Hi Alexander, I had the same error: sincos: /home/marcusmae/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:635: void llvm::PMTopLevelManager::schedulePass(llvm::Pass*): Assertion `PI && "Expected required passes to be initialized"' failed. The solution was to add: PassRegistry &Registry = *PassRegistry::getPassRegistry(); initializeCore(Registry);