similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM Developers' Meeting - Tentative Agenda & Hotel Location

I''m posting this job for Sony Imageworks. They''re located in Culver City, in sunny Los Angeles. http://www.imageworks.com/films/index.html They are looking for people who are well versed in a number of technologies and enjoy learning new languages and being somebody who can be thrown at a problem and learn what they need to do get the job done. Ruby on Rails is being used in

Firewall users, My apologies as I''m not on this list, so please respond directly as well as to the list. I did try to search the archives and didn''t find any hits, although the search did not like searching for terms with underscores in them (both clear_firewall and ip_forward). I was trying to understand why, when running shorewall stop, even though it echoes IP

Hello everyone, Can anyone give me some hint/suggestion for unzipping a file in R? The help file for "zip.file.extract" function seems to be difficult to understand. For example, the name of my zip file is "refGene.txt.gz", which is located in "C:\Documents and Settings\Desktop\test1". I would like to unzip this file to the same directory. Here's

Hi, I'd like to create a S4 class contains only one type of data. However, the number of slots varies. For example, I want to create a class "a", each slots in "a" contains numeric value only. > setClass("a", contains = "numeric") If I want to create an object "a" with only one slot containing c(3,4), I will write >

Hi, I have installed samba-2.0.0 on Digital Unix 4.0d. Now other unix boxs and Win98 clients can find the samba server. But my nt box can't find it. When issued the "net view \\hostname" (the hostname is where the samba server is on), I got the following error message: " System error 53 has occurred. The network path was not found. " Can you give any hints on this?

On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:42:57, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > If you are a "sophisticated" JIT user and are using either internal > APIs (either by integrating with LLVM, or by other C++ tricks), or are > using obscure or poorly documented public APIs (e.g., why is > runJITOnFunction exposed?) please make me aware of it! Hi, Daniel! We

I have a DSL that creates LLVM IR on the fly and JITs to x86 at runtime. (https://github.com/imageworks/OpenShadingLanguage) Primarily, we have a main app that uses the library that implements our DSL. But we have other usage cases in which we have written dynamically-loaded plugins to 3rd party apps that we don't control, and our plugins use our language, which necessitates linking to

On 11.05.2012, at 21:17, Larry Gritz wrote: > I have a DSL that creates LLVM IR on the fly and JITs to x86 at runtime. (https://github.com/imageworks/OpenShadingLanguage) > > Primarily, we have a main app that uses the library that implements our DSL. But we have other usage cases in which we have written dynamically-loaded plugins to 3rd party apps that we don't control, and our

I have an app that's dynamically generating and JITing code, and will have many such cases in the course of its run. They need to be JITed separately, because I need to execute the first batch before I know what the second one will be. Of course, I *still* need to execute the first after the need for the second arises, so I need to retain the JITed machine code for all the functions I

Hi, there, I cannot get accurate value for calculation. for example: ld<-sqrt(1*0.05*0.95*0.05*0.95) 0.05*0.95-ld=-6.938894e-18 0.05*0.95-ld==0 is False. I met this problem in my program, how can I handle it. Thanks. xj.

Another usage case, slightly different than your #1: 6. Dynamic code generation (not interactive with respect to the source code) - app generates code IR which is compiled as needed for execution (important difference: no waiting for a typing human in the loop, so very different expectations about responsiveness and bottlenecks) - compilation speed IS critical (because many such

Please visit our family photo albums at http://www.photos.vanpeters.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080306/9c42cd2b/attachment.htm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 1524 bytes Desc: not

Hello LLVMers! Amazingly, it's been 4 months since the release of LLVM 2.8. And so much has changed since then! April will be six months since the previous release, so it's time to start thinking about LLVM 2.9! Here is a tentative schedule for the release (and, of course, our schedules never slip): March 6th - Branch for release. March 7th-14th - Testing Phase 1

Will MC path for JNI be included in 2.9? Yuri

On Feb 19, 2011, at 8:05 PM, Yuri wrote: > On 02/19/2011 14:52, Yuri wrote: >> Will MC path for JNI be included in 2.9? >> > > Sorry. I meant: Will MC path for JIT be included in 2.9? While it would be nice, it doesn't seem like anyone is working on it at the moment. -Chris

On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Feb 19, 2011, at 8:05 PM, Yuri wrote: > > > On 02/19/2011 14:52, Yuri wrote: > >> Will MC path for JNI be included in 2.9? > >> > > > > Sorry. I meant: Will MC path for JIT be included in 2.9? > > While it would be nice, it doesn't seem like anyone is

The six month release time table is coming up soon, which means that it's ready to start planning for the next release! Here is the tentative schedule: October 14th – Create 3.0 Branch October 16th – First Round of Testing Starts October 23rd – First Round of Testing Ends / Bug Fixing Begins October 30th – Second Round of Testing Starts November 6th – Second Round of Testing Ends / Bug

> We will be branching for the 3.3 release one Monday, May 6th at 5PM PDT (Tuesday, May 7th 12:00 midnight GMT). I noticed there is a 3.3 branch in svn, but not in git. Anton, are you still the one managing the git repos? Also, I just added a note to the release info on trunk before noticing we had branched. I was about to port it over, but then noticed that

I will add release branches soon. I just decided to wait a bit in case of some emergency re-creation of branches, etc. On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: >> We will be branching for the 3.3 release one Monday, May 6th at 5PM PDT (Tuesday, May 7th 12:00 midnight GMT). > > I noticed there is a 3.3 branch in svn, but not in git.

On 02/19/2011 14:52, Yuri wrote: > Will MC path for JNI be included in 2.9? > Sorry. I meant: Will MC path for JIT be included in 2.9?