similar to: [LLVMdev] libcpu with m88k

What kinds of errors are you getting? On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Pradeep Ramachandran <pramach2 at uiuc.edu> wrote: > Hi, > I recently downloaded and installed the libcpu package (from http://libcpu.org > ) that uses llvm as the backend on my linux machine. I have a piece of > Motorola 88100 code (essentially the output of the 176.gcc benchmark > from SPEC CPU 2000) that

Interesting project I've discovered yesterday: http://www.libcpu.org/ Stefano

On 04/04/2012 07:08 AM, Charles Davis wrote: > Hi, > > Here's one of my proposals for GSoC 2012. What do you think? > > Chip > > Project Title: Table-Driven Decompilation > > Abstract: > Over the years, the LLVM family has grown to include nearly every type of build tool in existence. One of the few missing is a decompiler. LLVM's TableGen tool could

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Jevin Sweval <jevinsweval at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:57 AM, "C. Bergström" <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: >> Hi - >> >> Not sure if anyone else saw this or cares about a decompiler (not personally >> tested) >> https://github.com/draperlaboratory/fracture >> >> I wonder if

Is there a recommended cpu emulator that I can use as a backend? I just finish porting the libcpu project to llvm tot (3.0) enough so that it builds without warnings, however I'm not sure if the result works (on OS X 10.7.1). Seems like the fibonacci test only works for m88k, the others seem to continually dump the module. Regardless since the project does not seem too active, I don't

> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 05:44:02PM -0700, Daniel Dilts wrote: >> Does there exist a tool that could lift a binary (assembly for some >> supported target) to LLVM IR? If there isn't, does this seem like >> something that would be feasible? There's plenty of variations on the idea: Revgen/S2E, Fracture, Dagger (my own), libcpu, several closed-source ones used by

Hi there. I've looking libcpu project and some history of the mailing list and got a question: what is the status of the disassembler? I mean, is there someone working on it, what targets does it support and so on. I mean, it would be interesting to be able to "undo" the operations LLVM does, like machine code->LLVM IR. If there's no one working with this right now, I'd

On 3/12/15 8:14 PM, Daniel Dilts wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Ahmed Bougacha > <ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com <mailto:ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 05:44:02PM -0700, Daniel Dilts wrote: > >> Does there exist a tool that could lift a binary (assembly for some > >> supported target) to LLVM IR?

Hi - Not sure if anyone else saw this or cares about a decompiler (not personally tested) https://github.com/draperlaboratory/fracture I wonder if they have been in contact with anyone in the community in getting this upstreamed. Does it look interesting to anyone else? (thoughts/random comments/feedback)

I'm wondering if anyone is working on a machine code -> LLVM bitcode disassembler? Obviously, there won't be a one-to-one correspondence but it seems like you should be able to get close. There's always inline asm for the remaining fragments. So is there such a thing? Thank you, Bob

HI Rusty, I wanted to play with lguest. As it was recently merge upstream by Linus, i took a look and the location looks like driver/lguest*. Unfortunately my local git repo cannot get the 2.6.23-rc2 changes from upstream somehow :-/.[duh... says "Cannot get the repository state from http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git"]. i do not know what i am doing

HI Rusty, I wanted to play with lguest. As it was recently merge upstream by Linus, i took a look and the location looks like driver/lguest*. Unfortunately my local git repo cannot get the 2.6.23-rc2 changes from upstream somehow :-/.[duh... says "Cannot get the repository state from http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git"]. i do not know what i am doing

Dear llvm-dev community, I am trying to analyze the optimization remarks generated through clang using -fsave-optimization-remark with -O3. --- !Analysis Pass: loop-vectorize Name: CFGNotUnderstood DebugLoc: { File: c-ray-mt.c, Line: 177, Column: 2 } Function: main Args: - String: 'loop not vectorized: ' - String: loop control flow is not understood by vectorizer I tried to look for

Can I add classes to a rails application manually i.e without using script generate Model/Controller? The reason I am asking, I added a class by putting it in the controller class. I can access the class and its method from command-line (irb), but when I try to instantiate it in another controller, I get "uninitialized constant" error. If I try using script\generate Model

I have a class that is hand-coded (not generated using generator). Is there a preferred location for the file. app/components ? does it matter? Thanks, -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi, Here's one of my proposals for GSoC 2012. What do you think? Chip Project Title: Table-Driven Decompilation Abstract: Over the years, the LLVM family has grown to include nearly every type of build tool in existence. One of the few missing is a decompiler. LLVM's TableGen tool could potentially accelerate development of such a tool; most backends already have the information needed

Structure of the Xen source code hi all, I installed Xen on my Gentoo machine successfully from source. Now i am going through the code. instead of banging aimlessly for a week or so i thought i should ask the mailing list the following small doubts. I noticed that following directories are there in my xen-3.0.3_0-src directories. 1. linux-2.6.-xen-sparse 2. pristine-linux-2.6.16.29 3.

paging mechanism clarification Hi All, The Xen uses 2 level Paging Mechanism to resolve the Virtual Addresses into frame numbers from domU.The first level is taken care by the MMU for the domU i.e translation from virtual address to the physical address just like normal paging mechanism. The second level of translation is done by the Xen hypervisor.It translates the pseduo physical address

Hi, I am creating a sortable list using this code: <%= sortable_element("fields_list", :url => { :action => "order", :id => @fields_list }) %> it creates a sortable and I can move elements up and down, but it is not making any call to the "order" method. I do not see any log activity in the development log nor do I see any errors there. The

Dear LLVM community, How to find out which optimization passes have been performed and which passes have failed? Regards, Pradeep Kumar -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20181117/20c7ad68/attachment.html>