similar to: [LLVMdev] Long & double data type support in LLVM

<div> </div><div>Yes, broad. But what guys say: "You LLVM developers are all racists, because you use 'master' word"</div><div>Or broader: "You  all developers are all racists, because you use 'master' word". We are not racists, but other guys think so.</div><div>So let's begin consistent and take into account all

<div>Here we've began discussion about "master"</div><div><a href="https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-June/142448.html">https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-June/142448.html</a></div><div> </div><div>Lets remove Job word completely</div><div><pre>But as one can easily fact-check,

why llvm contains IntrusiveRefCntPtr instead of using only std::shared_ptr? IntrusiveRefCntPtr widely used in llvm and clang source code. Due to better performance? for example in main func of clang frontend: int cc1_main(ArrayRef<const char *> Argv, const char *Argv0, void *MainAddr) { ensureSufficientStack(); std::unique_ptr<CompilerInstance> Clang(new CompilerInstance());

Hi All Does anyone know any example compiler where it has vector/matrix as first class type like matlab using llvm? If not, does anyone have idea how that should be done on llvm? Thanks Leon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20101215/92febead/attachment.html>

Hi, I have been using clang for quite a while, and I can use `clang -fno-builtin hello.c` to prevent the generation of llvm built-in functions, such as llvm.memset. Recently, I switched to gcc with DragonEgg, since the program to be built is originally designed to be compiled with gcc. I searched on the web, but did not find any information about how to set DragonEgg parameters. Could anyone

Hi all, I used to use llvm-g++ to transform C++ source to LLVM IR. Now I am trying to switch to using DragonEgg, but I faced some problems because of the way DragonEgg is naming types in the resulting IR file. An example: LLVM-GCC: %"struct.Vector<ARPResponder::Entry>" = type { %"struct.ARPResponder::Entry"*, i32, i32 } %"struct.Vector<String>" = type {

Hello Duncan, There is a discussion with Chris Lattner: http://old.nabble.com/Eliminating-the-'void'-type-td33726468.html In the discussion, Chris Lattner suggest Type::getVoidTy() should still exist and return {} for API continuity. If VoidTy and isVoidTy() go away, how do deal with the isVoidTy() function call in LLVM source tree? Another issue is: What should ReturnInst constructor

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:54 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 6:20 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 4:48 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: >>>> Hi Eric,

Rahul Agarwal Analyst Equities Quantitative Research UBS_ISC, Hyderabad On Net: 19 533 6363 hi let me explain you the problem we have a database which is in this format Stocks 30-Jan-08 28-Feb-08 31-Mar-08 30-Apr-08 a 1.00 3.00 7.00 3.00 b 2.00 4.00 4.00 7.00 c 3.00 8.00 655.00 3.00 d 4.00 23.00 4.00 5.00 e 5.00 78.00 6.00 5.00 and we have a query

Attached are the Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results for current llvm/dragonegg svn on x86_64-apple-darwin11 built against Xcode 4.3.2 and FSF gcc 4.6.3. The benchmarks for -msse3 and -msse4 appear identical (at least for degg+optnz). This is fortunate since there seems to be a bug in -msse4 on 2.33 GHz (T7600) Intel Core 2 Duo Merom (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=12434).

---Adding llvm-dev list to CC--- Hi Alberto, Thanks for your prompt reply. Actually, I need this information(about total allocation size and object structure) on runtime, so that is why I was planning to encode this info and store it in the memory itself. Regards, Udit On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 7:05 PM Alberto Barbaro <barbaro.alberto at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Udit, > I'm not

Hi Duncan I am facing a build error about __builtin_iceil when compiled with dragonegg using -ffast-math option. My dragonegg is built with gcc-4.7.0 (I am compiling namd spec benchmark here again). Any idea? g++ -march=bdver2 -save-temps -fplugin=/home/anboyapa/install/bin/dragonegg.so -O2 -march=bdver2 -save-temps -fplugin=/home/anboyapa/install/bin/dragonegg.so -mno-fma -mfma4 -ffast-math

On 6 November 2012 14:52, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Anitha, > > > On 06/11/12 10:19, Anitha Boyapati wrote: > >> Hi Duncan >> I am facing a build error about __builtin_iceil >> > > it's surely just that dragonegg doesn't have any support for this builtin. > ok. Just verified that Target.cpp and x86_builtins do not have

Hi Yes, they both are exactly the same. Regards Shahzad On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi, is the comb.ll used here: > > >> $ time lli ./comb.ll >> >> then the runtime is >> >> real    0m2.671s >> user    0m2.640s >> sys     0m0.020s >> >> But, if I convert this same file comb,ll

Hi ether, > i install mpc-0.8.2 in /home/ether/local/, and gcc-4.5 is configure with: > $HOME/sources/gcc-4.5/configure --enable-plugin --enable-lto > --prefix=$HOME/local/gcc-4.5/ --enable-languages=c,c++ > --disable-bootstrap --disable-multilib --with-mpc=$HOME/local > --with-libelf=$HOME/local because GCC headers include mpc.h, when dragonegg uses GCC headers then it needs to

Hi Jack, > bash-3.2$ gcc-4 hello.c -S -O1 -o - -fplugin=./dragonegg.so > cc1: error: Cannot load plugin ./dragonegg.so > dlopen(./dragonegg.so, 10): Symbol not found: _classify_argument looks like you forgot to apply the i386_static.diff patch to gcc. Ciao, Duncan.

I'm getting the following error when compiling OpenCV 2.0 with OpenMP and SSE intrinsics enabled with GCC+DragonEgg(newest SVN version): /usr/lib64/ccache/c++ -Wall -Wno-long-long -pthread -ffunction-sections -D_GLIBCXX_PARALLEL -fopenmp -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -fplugin=/home/John/Documents/Project/DragonEgg/dragonegg/dragonegg.so -O3 -DNDEBUG -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -ffast-math -mmmx

Hi, > I tried it with -o - but its producing an error > > gcc: fatal error: cannot specify -o with -c, -S or -E with multiple files > > What you suggest? what I wrote: >> for F in *.c ; do B=`basename $F .c` ; gcc -fplugin=/path/to/dragonegg.so >> -S -o - $F -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-emit-ir | opt -adce -o $B.ll ; done >> clang *.ll Thanks to the for loop and

Hello all, I am willing to do "eliminating the void type" project. Is there anyone working on it? === Overview === The general concept is to replaced void with {}. And 'ret void' is a synonym of 'ret {} {}.' === Further Implementation Details === 1. Deleting VoidTyID 2. Deleting LLVMVoidTypeKind (one-to-one relation between VoidTyID and LLVMVoidTypeKind) 3. Use

On 04/01/13 15:58, Duncan Sands wrote: > PS: Another possibility is to do link-time optimization, since at that point the > optimizers are capable of finding out if that global is used anywhere else or > not. By the way, do the GCC optimizers get this, i.e. remove the loads? Ciao, Duncan.