similar to: [LLVMdev] 2.8 Release notes

On 2010-10-04 06:43, Chris Lattner wrote: > Hi All, > > I've finished the first draft of the 2.8 release notes: > http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html > > Please feel free to commit improvements and enhancements. There are "a lot" of changes that went into 2.8, but I think I've scraped most of them out of the commits. However, it is also highly likely that I

If your project works with LLVM 2.7 and you want it included in the release notes, please email me a blurb to include ASAP. -Chris

Hi All, With 2.9 starting to make its way out into the world, it is time to start poking at the release notes. I plan to make a pass through llvm-commits to cull some of the major changes into bullets, but am already behind and insanely busy with other stuff over the next week. If you have commit access, I'd really appreciate it if you could take a pass through llvm/docs/ReleaseNotes.html

Hi, On Apr 14, 2010, at 10:51 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote: > Hello fellow LLVMers and Clangstas, > > We want to make Clang great, and we need your help! > > Helping is easy: just build Clang on your platform and start using it as your main compiler for LLVM and Clang development. Much of the Clang team has been living on Clang for at least several weeks already, and we've

I can't switch to clang on my project until it can handle boost headers. On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:17 AM, Rene Rebe <rene at exactcode.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On Apr 14, 2010, at 10:51 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote: > >> Hello fellow LLVMers and Clangstas, >> >> We want to make Clang great, and we need your help! >> >> Helping is easy: just build Clang

Hello fellow LLVMers and Clangstas, We want to make Clang great, and we need your help! Helping is easy: just build Clang on your platform and start using it as your main compiler for LLVM and Clang development. Much of the Clang team has been living on Clang for at least several weeks already, and we've found it to be quite stable for development. If you run into problems---poor

No, this is not the case. Just because you compile something to LLVM IR does not make the thing you compiled work on every architecture. You may even be able to retarget it to any architecture (it depends), but this in no way means the result will *actually work*. The LLVM IR generated by llvm-gcc is very architecture dependent. Theoretically you could make a C compiler that was mostly C

On Oct 21, 2008, at 2:27 AM, Jay Foad wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to use LLVM to compile and optimise code when I don't know > whether the target CPU is big- or little-endian. This would allow me > to create a single optimised LLVM bitcode binary of an application, > and then run it through a JIT compiler on systems of differening > endianness. Ok. > I realise that

Hi Chris, just spotted that the libc++ link in the 2.8 release notes is invalid, points to http://libc++.llvm.org/, should be ...libcxx... René On Oct 4, 2010, at 6:43 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > Hi All, > > I've finished the first draft of the 2.8 release notes: > http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html > > Please feel free to commit improvements and enhancements.

does that mean .o generated with gcc (.c -> .s and .s -> .o) will not contain llvm ir? i meant, final kernel bitcode ir arch independent and can be JIT with any arch-specific backend. Is it not the case? thanks, ashish On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 10:43 PM, Andrew Lenharth <andrewl at lenharth.org> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Ashish Bijlani > <ashish.bijlani at

Hi, I'd like to use LLVM to compile and optimise code when I don't know whether the target CPU is big- or little-endian. This would allow me to create a single optimised LLVM bitcode binary of an application, and then run it through a JIT compiler on systems of differening endianness. I realise that in general the LLVM IR depends on various characteristics of the target; I'd just

Hi all, today we had a performance issue transfering a big amount of data where one file was over 50GB. Rsync was tunneled over SSH and we expected the data to be synced within hours. However after over 10 hours the data is still not synced ... The sending box has rsync running with 60-80 % CPU load (2GHz Pentium 4) while the receiver is nearly idle. So far I had no acces to the poblematic

Good day! To get ready for the release, we need to make sure that the list of external open source projects using LLVM 3.0 (file:///Volumes/Sandbox/llvm/llvm.src/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#externalproj) is up to date. Please send me an email with the project's name and a short description of it. Alternatively, if the project was commented out and you would still like to be listed, just tell me

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 6:45 PM, Ulf Volmer <u.volmer at u-v.de> wrote: > On 14.09.2017 23:56, Larry Martell wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Ulf Volmer <u.volmer at u-v.de> wrote: > >>> Again, please enter 'about:plugins' in the address bar of your browser >>> to make sure, that the right java version is activated. >> >> This

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> wrote: > On 14 September 2017 at 14:51, Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Ulf Volmer <u.volmer at u-v.de> wrote: >>> On 14.09.2017 19:54, Larry Martell wrote: >>> >>>> Where would I do that? This is something

hello all: I have two machines (approx 50 miles apart) that I need to create a co-located backup solution for. One machine will serve as a central fileserver for an office, and every week a backup of that directory will be sent through the internet to a box I have here locally. I am aware of rsync being able to run over SSH, however I need this to be totally automated (SSH opening, passwords

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Ulf Volmer <u.volmer at u-v.de> wrote: > On 14.09.2017 21:26, Larry Martell wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> wrote: > >>> So it sounds like the links needed for the plugin to work are not >>> configured on the system. So you have some symlinks pointing to the >>>

Another one: Name: SDC - The Stupid D Compiler (https://github.com/bhelyer/SDC) Description: A project seeking to write a self-hosting compiler for the D programming language, without using the frontend of the reference compiler (DMD). Regards, Alex On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > Good day! > > To get ready for the release, we need

Readers, Would someone advise whether the distribution of an obsolete version of java should be reported as a bug; http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=827

I have a simple backup shell script that I am using for backups. I have a problem which I think is a result of this error: rsync warning: some files vanished before they could be transferred (code 24) at main.c(789) Any command after the rsync never gets executed if I get the above error. The file system is very large and we have engineers working at all hours so it is rare that this would