similar to: [LLVMdev] JavaScript Backend

On Oct 2, 2010, at 8:11 PM, David LaPalomento wrote: > Hi all, > Over the past couple weeks, I've been putting together a JavaScript > backend for LLVM. At this point, I believe I've got reasonable > implementations for all the instructions, primitives and derived > types. I haven't gotten around to most of the intrinsics but I thought > it would be a good idea to

On 02.01.2013, at 20:37, Alon Zakai wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Sebastian Redl" <sebastian.redl at getdesigned.at> >> >> It would be awesome to combine the llvm.org demo with the in-browser >> emscripten (or possibly a server-side emscripten) so that the user >> can execute his snippets in the browser. >>

On 02.01.2013, at 19:51, Eli Bendersky wrote: >> I compiled parts of LLVM to JavaScript using emscripten and made a demo of parsing and executing LLVM assembly, >> >> http://kripken.github.com/llvm.js/demo.html >> >> Basically you enter some LLVM IR, press a button and see the output of compiling and running it, directly in the browser. >> >> This was

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sebastian Redl" <sebastian.redl at getdesigned.at> > To: "Eli Bendersky" <eliben at google.com> > Cc: "Alon Zakai" <azakai at mozilla.com>, "llvmdev" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Wednesday, January 2, 2013 11:24:33 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM IR execution in JavaScript >

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Eli Friedman" <eli.friedman at gmail.com> > To: "Alon Zakai" <azakai at mozilla.com> > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 7:02:34 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Emscripten: LLVM => JavaScript > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Alon Zakai <azakai at mozilla.com> > wrote: >

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Alon Zakai <azakai at mozilla.com> wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Eli Friedman" <eli.friedman at gmail.com> >> To: "Alon Zakai" <azakai at mozilla.com> >> Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu >> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 7:02:34 PM >> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Emscripten:

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Alon Zakai <azakai at mozilla.com> wrote: > On that topic, I see there is an LLVM users page, > > http://llvm.org/Users.html > > - what is the procedure for suggesting adding a project to > there? Send a patch to llvm-commits. > The third issue I want to raise is regarding closer > integration with LLVM. Right now, Emscripten uses

Hi everyone, I wanted to mention a project using LLVM: Emscripten. Emscripten is an open source LLVM to JavaScript compiler, http://emscripten.org https://github.com/kripken/emscripten/ There are various demos linked to on the wiki (the first link), of various large C/C++ codebases compiled to JS and running on the web, like Python, Bullet, Poppler, etc. Emscripten is not a

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sebastian Redl" <sebastian.redl at getdesigned.at> > To: "Alon Zakai" <azakai at mozilla.com> > Cc: "llvmdev" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>, "Eli Bendersky" <eliben at google.com> > Sent: Wednesday, January 2, 2013 11:44:27 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM IR execution in JavaScript >

The PNaCl project has implemented various IR simplification passes that simplify LLVM IR by lowering complex features to simpler features. We'd like to upstream some of these IR passes to LLVM. We'd like to explore if this acceptable, and if so, how we should go about doing this. The immediate reason is that Emscripten is reusing PNaCl's IR passes for its new "fastcomp"

> $ llc bar.bc -filetype=obj -o bar.o > $ clang -shared -o bar.so bar.o > $ clang -use-gold-plugin foo.o bar.so -o t > > Is that correct? In particular, "lld t" should show a dependency on bar. > Any particular reason for not adding this to the plugin api? > > The result is a native .so here. My goal is to have a bitcode result. > >

On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Rafael Ávila de Espíndola < rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > On 08/12/11 03:56 PM, Ivan Krasin wrote: > > Hi llvm team! > > > > I'm currently working on the extended version of llvm-ld, which has an > > ability to check if all the symbols present (and fail if some symbols > > are not resolved), treat archives in

On 02.01.2013, at 20:50, Alon Zakai wrote: > I agree both are useful approaches. I went with clientside-everything in this demo because I work on that stuff and like it ;) Oh, I agree that it is awesome. It just froze my browser completely for several seconds just compiling the Hello World program. Sebastian

Hi everyone, I compiled parts of LLVM to JavaScript using emscripten and made a demo of parsing and executing LLVM assembly, http://kripken.github.com/llvm.js/demo.html Basically you enter some LLVM IR, press a button and see the output of compiling and running it, directly in the browser. This was done mainly as a fun hacking project over the holidays, but I'm posting it here in case

> I compiled parts of LLVM to JavaScript using emscripten and made a demo of parsing and executing LLVM assembly, > > http://kripken.github.com/llvm.js/demo.html > > Basically you enter some LLVM IR, press a button and see the output of compiling and running it, directly in the browser. > > This was done mainly as a fun hacking project over the holidays, but I'm posting it

Hi there, We are interested in adopting Opus into our web based application for speech recording. I'm wondering if there is a plan to port Opus encoder and decoder to Javascript using Emscripten in the near future? Best Regards, Rachel Wu ETS.org ________________________________ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely

Hello, First of all, I am a complete newblet to anything dealing with audio (a lot of the vocabulary is still rather mysterious to me). I also don't often program in C so please don't throw too many stones if my workflow is less than ideal. :) I would like to port the vorbis encoder to JavaScript. Instead of porting everything by hand from ground up, which would take who-knows-how-long,

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Mark Seaborn <mseaborn at chromium.org>wrote: > >> The PNaCl project has implemented various IR simplification passes that >> simplify LLVM IR by lowering complex features to simpler features. We'd >> like to upstream some of these IR passes to

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote: > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Mark Seaborn <mseaborn at chromium.org>wrote: > >> The PNaCl project has implemented various IR simplification passes that >> simplify LLVM IR by lowering complex features to simpler features. We'd >> like to upstream some of these IR passes

Thomas, Thank you for your interest in this, you description is as accurate as I can see. > From my perspective your challenges will be to get the containers right. > WebM for audio+video > Ogg for audio > > Also (I'm not that familiar with webRTC) you might need to reencode > to Opus and VP8 in some cases? here is the great news