similar to: [LLVMdev] libstdc++.so.6 problem

Hi all, I am really stumped on this problem. I googled and could not find any solution. Here is the problem. I compiled and installed glibc-2.5-20090518 in a local directory with gcc version 4.1.2. I compiled glibc-2.5 because I wanted to test glibc-2.5 on gcc first llvm-gcc. However, after I installed glibc, llvm-gcc does not work any more. It reported this error message:

Hi All, Did anyone try to compile glibc with llvm-gcc or clang? I tried to configure glibc with CC=llvm-gcc and it failed with this message: ... checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin//install -c checking whether ln -s works... yes checking for gcc... llvm-gcc checking for suffix of object files... configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile See

Hi Aaron, Duncan Thanks for the answers. >From Duncan's e-mail, I've tried to build llvm-2.6. First problem was a missing dependence on lbffi.so.4. But I've downloaded the source from redhat, compiled and passed that point. Now I have another missing dependence on GLIBCXX_3.4.9. The version in my system is 3.4.6-11. I've been looking around for a 3.4.9 rpm for redhat, could

Hi, I try to compile LLVM and the GCC frontend for LLVM. The steps that I follow are first to compile LLVM and later to compile GCC front end. I tried to compile LLVM 1.8, 1.9 releases and the CVS versions. I tried to compile with different GCC compilers 3.4.0, 4.1.2 and 4.2.0 GCC compilers 3.4.0 and 4.2.0 fail compiling LLVM sources. GCC 4.1.2 works. I cannot compile GCC front end. When I

My platform is RedHat Enterprise 5, as shown below: [wuxi at ppidellsc1420 lib]$ uname -a Linux ppidellsc1420 2.6.18-8.el5 #1 SMP Fri Jan 26 14:15:21 EST 2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux and I install gcc-4.2.3, as shown below: [wuxi at ppidellsc1420 lib]$ g++ -v Using built-in specs. Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-4.2.3/configure

The errors are /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found I can not use it in the command line... Rafael Espindola wrote: >> However, I got >> "... >> checking for gcc... llvm-gcc -use-gold-plugin >> checking for C compiler default output file name... >> ... >> configure: error: C

Hi Eliseu, > Now I have another missing dependence on GLIBCXX_3.4.9. The version in > my system is 3.4.6-11. how does this missing dependence manifest itself? Ciao, Duncan.

Hi all, A question about statically linking a pass to clang instead of dynamically loading it at runtime. I am stumped on this bug for a while. I inserted a pass under lib/Transforms/mypass directory, registered it with INITIALIZE_PASS and defined createMyPass in the pass. Also I added file mypass.h in include/llvm/Transforms/ to expose the accessor functions that expose my passes. Entries are

I am attempting to install llvm on CentOS 5.3, which uses gcc-4.1.2 as its system compiler. Since this compiler has reported to behave poorly with llvm, I built gcc-4.2.4 in an insulated directory for use with my llvm installation. However, I am not sure I am configuring properly. The gcc-4.2.4 installation is in /pkg/bin/gcc-4.2.4. Here is my config line: ../llvm-2.5/configure

Some things to check: Run llvm-gcc a.c -emit-llvm -use-gold-plugin -Wl,debug This will print the link command line. What is it? Do you get the same error messages if you run just that? Are gold and the plugin linked with the same libstdc++? Cheers On Jun 5, 2010 11:50 PM, "Guoliang Jin" <jingl1345 at gmail.com> wrote: The errors are /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version

Ah, nevermind... just needed to make clean to clear out some of the junk I compiled with gcc-4.1.2. The build completed without error. On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Scott Ricketts <sricketts at maxentric.com>wrote: > I am attempting to install llvm on CentOS 5.3, which uses gcc-4.1.2 as its > system compiler. Since this compiler has reported to behave poorly with > llvm, I built

I am still having problems getting everything installed. I realized that the successful build of llvm-2.5 had in fact been configured to use the system gcc (4.1.2). However, I was unable to sucessfully build llvm-gcc with gcc 4.1.2. I went back and attempted to build llvm-2.5 with gcc-4.2.4 (installed in a separate directory from system gcc). However, I got the same build error as before. Then I

Hi, > But when I use 'make ENABLE_OPTMIZED=1', the compilation fails with the spelling mistake: should be ENABLE_OPTIMIZED not ENABLE_OPTMIZED. > message: > > /home/wuxi/llvm-2.2/llvm-objects-opt/Release/bin/tblgen: > /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found (required by > /home/wuxi/llvm-2.2/llvm-objects-opt/Release/bin/tblgen) The

I easily installed and used skype on my previous linux distro on this same machine, but am having problems getting it to work on my relatively new centos 5.3. I downloaded three versions of skype from their website: the two fedora rpms wouldn't install, their error messages complaining that it needed another package, a package which was already installed. (I figured it had to be looking for

Hi Eli, I tried to build llvm with gcc-4.4.3 and binutils-2.20.1. This time it failed with /build/toolchain/src/llvm-2.7/objdir/Release/bin/tblgen: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found (required by /build/toolchain/src/llvm-2.7/objdir/Release/bin/tblgen) make[1]: *** [/build/toolchain/src/llvm-2.7/objdir/lib/VMCore/Release/Intrinsics.gen.tmp] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving

On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Zeng Bin <ezengbin at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> There might be a bug in DeadStoreElimination.cpp. This pass eliminates >> stores backwards aggressively in an end BB. It does not check dependencies >> on stores in an end BB though.

If int_guard_load returns a pointer based on the passed-in pointer, it captures it (at least according to the definition of "capture" which NoCapture uses). -Eli On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Zeng Bin <ezengbin at gmail.com> wrote: > It does not do anything. It is an abstract function which transforms a > pointer and returns another pointer of the same type. It does not

It does not do anything. It is an abstract function which transforms a pointer and returns another pointer of the same type. It does not visit memory or capture the pointer parameter. On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at

Hi all, There might be a bug in DeadStoreElimination.cpp. This pass eliminates stores backwards aggressively in an end BB. It does not check dependencies on stores in an end BB though. For example, in this code snippet: ... 1. %sum.safe_r47.pre-phi = phi i64* [ %sum.safe_r47.pre, %entry.for.end_crit_edge ], [ %sum.safe_r42, %for.body ] 2. %call9 = call i32 @gettimeofday(%struct.timeval* %end,

Hi all, I'm trying to compile dahdi-tools on Ubuntu 8.04 on Xen (Amazon EC2 to be exact). dahdi-linux compiled and installed successfully, after which I do the following to install dahdi-tools: wget http://downloads.digium.com/pub/telephony/dahdi-tools/dahdi-tools-current.tar.gz tar xzvf dahdi-tools-current.tar.gz cd dahdi-tools* ./configure make make install make config Everything