Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] LLVMdev Digest, Vol 75, Issue 40"
2010 Sep 17
1
[LLVMdev] Colocation Facility for LLVM?
Hi Danny,
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote:
> Can't offer it in the bay area, but i can offer space in oregon state
> university (which is where the osuosl machines reside).
> http://osuosl.org/services
>
> Why do you need access if you have people willing to handle support
> tickets and remote console/power control cards?
2010 Sep 19
3
[LLVMdev] Colocation Facility for LLVM?
Another suggestion I've been given is this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm. You wouldn't even have to supply
hardware.
On 17 September 2010 17:13, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote:
> Can't offer it in the bay area, but i can offer space in oregon state
> university (which is where the osuosl machines reside).
> http://osuosl.org/services
>
> Why
2010 Sep 17
0
[LLVMdev] Colocation Facility for LLVM?
Can't offer it in the bay area, but i can offer space in oregon state
university (which is where the osuosl machines reside).
http://osuosl.org/services
Why do you need access if you have people willing to handle support
tickets and remote console/power control cards?
I have yet to see a problem that i could not solve (since the cards
can display console, control power to the machine, etc)
2009 Mar 19
0
[LLVMdev] Wiki?
Done
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote:
> As soon as i get out of this meeting I will
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:22 PM, someguy
> <just.s0m3.guy+llvmdev at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Daniel, can you set up the virtual host please?
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 9:02 PM, John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu>
2009 Mar 23
2
[LLVMdev] Wiki?
I'll see which plugins others use.
Which wiki's pretty printing are you thinking of in particular?
2009/3/23 someguy <just.s0m3.guy+llvmdev at gmail.com>:
> Daniel,
> Can we add the relevant plugins for pretty printing of source code?
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 4:45 AM, Aaron Gray
> <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Done
>>
2009 Mar 23
0
[LLVMdev] Wiki?
Daniel,
Can we add the relevant plugins for pretty printing of source code?
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 4:45 AM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com
> wrote:
> >Done
>
> Yay, we got Wiki, now I can do some wicked UML diagrams for LLVM, he, he,
> he
> :)
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Aaron
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at
2009 Mar 20
2
[LLVMdev] Wiki?
>Done
Yay, we got Wiki, now I can do some wicked UML diagrams for LLVM, he, he, he
:)
Many thanks,
Aaron
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote:
> As soon as i get out of this meeting I will
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:22 PM, someguy
> <just.s0m3.guy+llvmdev at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Daniel, can you set up the virtual
2008 Nov 03
0
[LLVMdev] Buildbot now up and new build failures
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote:
> I set up a buildbot for llvm at http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/waterfall
> It builds every single revision of llvm, runs the testsuite, and
> reports the results. It takes about 3 minutes per build+test right
> now (it's an 8 core machine).
>
> Currently i have it building x86_64-linux.
2014 Aug 11
2
[LLVMdev] [Zorg] Reorganisation, documentation and other issues
Hello everyone,
Zorg is a common code for multiple different buildbot setups. This is why
it sits in its own subtree.
The only tricky thing there is that it assumes some relative position of
zorg and master setup. Documenting this would save somebody some time.
All together wasn't a problem so far. But having a better documentation and
a set of files for a simple local setup is a good idea.
2008 Nov 10
0
[LLVMdev] Buildbot now up and new build failures
Hi Daniel,
I see that you're doing a Debug build. Could you do a "Release" or
"Release-Asserts" build instead? This will catch errors which
developers won't normally see.
-bw
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote:
> I set up a buildbot for llvm at http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/waterfall
> It builds every single
2008 Nov 03
0
[LLVMdev] Buildbot now up and new build failures
Daniel,
Thanks! Is this doing a build of Ada and Fortran? :-)
-bw
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote:
> I set up a buildbot for llvm at http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/waterfall
> It builds every single revision of llvm, runs the testsuite, and
> reports the results. It takes about 3 minutes per build+test right
> now (it's an 8
2008 Nov 03
0
[LLVMdev] Buildbot now up and new build failures
That's cool. And I agree that it if didn't work, people would ignore
it. :-) At the moment, we have only Duncan and a couple of Fortran
guys to tell us when an Apple merge has broken something. I'm sure
that they would welcome an early detection system. :-)
-bw
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote:
> No :)
>
> I'm trying to
2009 Jan 29
1
[LLVMdev] Validation Buildbot is Up!
Also, if you want to put the buildbot status with the other buildbots
we have on google1.osuosl.org, i'm happy to add your config to the
master
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote:
> If you create a slave name and password for me, i'm happy to put one
> of the ubuntu 8.04 8 core machines i have running it. They are
> x86_64-linux
2010 Sep 17
3
[LLVMdev] Colocation Facility for LLVM?
Hi all,
I don't have very high hopes, but does anyone happen to have available
some kind of colocation services in the Bay Area that they could
donate to LLVM?
I would really like to establish a proper LLVM lab somewhere instead
of relying on hardware which is residing at various companies. I would
be willing to personally donate some hardware, but don't have any
place to put it.
My
2008 Nov 03
2
[LLVMdev] Buildbot now up and new build failures
No :)
I'm trying to start by having something that keeps people from
breaking the build and tests (by letting them submit patches and being
whiny 3 minutes after something breaks).
Once that is done, we can move to something that keeps all the
languages in good shape.
I think if i simply made it do everything at once, people would just
ignore it. At least, that's my experience :)
2008 Nov 10
0
[LLVMdev] Buildbot now up and new build failures
Yes.
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 4:45 PM, David Greene <dag at cray.com> wrote:
> On Monday 10 November 2008 15:28, Bill Wendling wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> I see that you're doing a Debug build. Could you do a "Release" or
>> "Release-Asserts" build instead? This will catch errors which
>> developers won't normally see.
>
> I
2008 Nov 10
2
[LLVMdev] Buildbot now up and new build failures
On Monday 10 November 2008 15:28, Bill Wendling wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I see that you're doing a Debug build. Could you do a "Release" or
> "Release-Asserts" build instead? This will catch errors which
> developers won't normally see.
I never knew about buildbot until just now.
This could really help with the validation proposal I just posted. Can
2017 Jul 09
2
Uncovering non-determinism in LLVM - The Next Steps
On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Jack Howarth via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> FYI, I just successfully performed a 3-stage bootstrap with
>> stage2/stage3 object file comparison on x86_64-apple-darwin16 for
>>
2008 Nov 11
1
[LLVMdev] Buildbot now up and new build failures
On Monday 10 November 2008 16:50, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> Yes.
Cool. I'd like to look at installing something here. You offered to walk us
through how to do this.
I'll see if I can install buildbot here and then mail you back when I'm ready
to go.
-Dave
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 4:45 PM, David Greene <dag at
2008 Aug 30
0
FOMS workshop deadline approaching
Hi all,
Below is an invitation to participate in the open media software
developer workshop FOMS to be held in January 2009 in Hobart,
Tasmania.
If you are keen to go, but cannot get your employer to sponsor your
trip, register by tomorrow (or as soon as you can) and request travel
sponsorship.
Others can still register closer to the date, but you might want to
start planning and booking your