similar to: [LLVMdev] Colocation Facility for LLVM?

Can't offer it in the bay area, but i can offer space in oregon state university (which is where the osuosl machines reside). http://osuosl.org/services Why do you need access if you have people willing to handle support tickets and remote console/power control cards? I have yet to see a problem that i could not solve (since the cards can display console, control power to the machine, etc)

Hi Danny, On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > Can't offer it in the bay area, but i can offer space in oregon state > university (which is where the osuosl machines reside). > http://osuosl.org/services > > Why do you need access if you have people willing to handle support > tickets and remote console/power control cards?

Another suggestion I've been given is this: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm. You wouldn't even have to supply hardware. On 17 September 2010 17:13, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > Can't offer it in the bay area, but i can offer space in oregon state > university (which is where the osuosl machines reside). > http://osuosl.org/services > > Why

On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Óscar Fuentes<ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> writes: > >> MSVC *is* continuously checked; see >> http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/clang-i686-xp-msvc9.  Anyone >> who breaks the MSVC build will get a nastygram from buildbot. > > This is new news for me. > > If the developer

All, I would like to thank the latest donor to the CentOS project: Neosurge.com. We have a nice new, shiny server to help get all those updates out faster. http://www.neosurge.com/ Neosurge has plenty of hosting options from normal website hosting to dedicated / co-located servers. And I can vouch for the speed of the traffic into the datacenters. You can definitely get CentOS pre-installed

These URLs don't work for me. How do I know what is broken? It builds fine on my x86 linux box. -----Original Message----- From: buildbot at google1.osuosl.org [mailto:buildbot at google1.osuosl.org] Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 5:12 PM To: Sanjiv Kumar Gupta - I00171 Cc: llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: buildbot failure in llvm on llvm-i686-linux The Buildbot has detected a new

On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 9:18 AM, <Sanjiv.Gupta at microchip.com> wrote: > These URLs don't work for me. How do I know what is broken? > It builds fine on my x86 linux box. Why don't the URLs work for you? In this case the problem was just because llvm.org went down. When an "svn" step fails; i.e., the line after "BUILD FAILED:", the problem is usually

Hello everyone, LLVM buildmaster is up and running as lab.llvm.org:8011. Daniel Berlin is working on getting the current buildslave passwords from the old buildmaster, but this may not be possible. I'd suggest changing buildslave passwords anyway, just in case. Buildslave owners, please contact me directly with your new passwords and I'll update the master as soon as I can. Thanks

Hi All, Recent conversations [1][2] would suggest we need to rethink zorg or at the very least improve the documentation. I've CC'ed Daniel Dunbar, Galina Kistanova and Duncan Sands because it seemed that they have contributed the most code to Zorg Organisation ========= The current organisation of the Zorg repository doesn't make a huge amount of sense from my perspective. There

Hi my name is Bob Mutch and I am the owner of Solutions with Service, a Canadian company that uses open source software products. I have started a project called ?Project SOS? (Support Open Source) to help fund free and open source software projects. I would like to make a donation to your open source work http://theora.org/ though our project. Here is the page that how the donations work.

I set up a buildbot for llvm at http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/waterfall It builds every single revision of llvm, runs the testsuite, and reports the results. It takes about 3 minutes per build+test right now (it's an 8 core machine). Currently i have it building x86_64-linux. Setting up a builder/slave for any platform would be trivial. I simply don't have machines running anything but

As soon as i get out of this meeting I will On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:22 PM, someguy <just.s0m3.guy+llvmdev at gmail.com> wrote: > Daniel, can you set up the virtual host please? > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 9:02 PM, John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: >> John Criswell wrote: >>> someguy wrote: >>> >>>> Hi All, >>>>

>Done Yay, we got Wiki, now I can do some wicked UML diagrams for LLVM, he, he, he :) Many thanks, Aaron On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > As soon as i get out of this meeting I will > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:22 PM, someguy > <just.s0m3.guy+llvmdev at gmail.com> wrote: >> Daniel, can you set up the virtual

A fairly serious question: how much can we (as users) donate to get the Google ads off the Wiki? I guess this does not give so much revenue, and it is really distracting. So, if we can match the annual income of Google Ads on the Wiki, I think I (and others) are willing to compensate this with donations. I have seen some potential Dutch users getting turned away seeing the main CentOS site

A few days ago Tal Galili posted a message about some controversies concerning the future of R. Having read the discussions, especially those following Ross Ihaka's post, I have come to the conclusion, that, as usual, the problem is money. I doubt there would be discussions about dropping R in its present form if the R-Foundation were properly funded and could hire computer scientists,

I have a few thoughs and questions about donating to Xiph that I hop you have a minute for. Here we go: == "Who donated what" list == As it seems we don't have a "Who donated what" list. I thought creating such a list could increase motivation to donate to some parties. What I currently have in mind would be to start listing donations from now on below the current content

Hello All, I want to ask about CentOS and money. Please do not start some kind of shitstorm over this, it isn't productive. I have just been looking at archive.org to see when the paypal option went missing from the donate menu at centos.org. I can't pin it down, but it was there on October 16, 2010 and isn't now, so that's the information I have on that point. There was a

On: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:27:02 -0500, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > I STILL do not understand why anyone would care what CentOS does > with money donated by people who used the product and wanted to > donate. > > If we were having wild beer parties every week ... as long as the > packages are built, compared, signed, and released on time, what >

On 09/19/2010 03:48 PM, Ben Laurie wrote: > Another suggestion I've been given is this: > http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm. You wouldn't even have to supply > hardware. The compile farm is a set of machines that is shared between different users. They are great to try your code on different architectures, but the level of control is a lot lower than the level you get from

Wine has reached the final round in the category: "Best Open Source of 2010" which gives a donation of EUR 300 to the winner. I recommend to vote for Wine (http://www.portalprogramas.com/software-libre/premios/proyecto/75)