similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM SVN Repository Offline for Maintenance Tomorrow

Dear All, Just a reminder that the maintenance will be commencing now. -- John T. John Criswell wrote: > Dear LLVMers and Clangers, > > We'll be doing some maintenance on the LLVM repository on Tuesday, Sept. > 14 (tomorrow). There were some files committed to the repository that > we believe need to be removed from both mainline, the branches, and the > revision

John Criswell wrote: > Dear All, > > Just a reminder that the maintenance will be commencing now. > Also, I managed to set things up so that you can use svn diff and svn up but not svn commit (I basically disabled commit access for everyone for the time being). -- John T. > -- John T. > > John Criswell wrote: > >> Dear LLVMers and Clangers, >>

Hi John- Will this also mean a purging of the llvm-commits archive, to remove the diffs with the guilty files in them? Alistair On 14 Sep 2010, at 01:38, John Criswell wrote: > Dear LLVMers and Clangers, > > We'll be doing some maintenance on the LLVM repository on Tuesday, Sept. > 14 (tomorrow). There were some files committed to the repository that > we believe need to

Please create a similar branch for Klee; I've been working on porting that to 2.7 as well.<br /> <br /> Best, Erich Ocean<br /> <br /> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:43 PM, John Criswell (criswell@uiuc.edu) wrote:<br /> > <br /> > Dear SAFECoders and LLVMers,<br /> > <br /> > There is some new work on moving DSA to the new LLVM 2.7 API.

> We'll be doing some maintenance on the LLVM repository on Tuesday, Sept. > 14 (tomorrow).  There were some files committed to the repository that > we believe need to be removed from both mainline, the branches, and the > revision history. Can someone familiar with git-svn confirm if the mirrors will have be to recreated before they are useful again? > -- John T. Cheers, --

On 10/11/2018 03:27 PM, James Y Knight via llvm-dev wrote: > TLDR: https://github.com/llvm-git-prototype/ exists as a read-only mirror of SVN, and is being updated continuously with a script running on an llvm-project AWS VM. > Hi James, What is the current status of the monorepo, have you resolved all the known issues with the history? Are there any other changes that need to be made

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 4:04 PM NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, David. > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 7:46 AM David Jones via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hi James, >> >> I've started working with the prototype layout in context of Google's >> internal infrastructure. With deep apologies, I

Hi, I'm interested in using the "Data Structure Analysis" that is apparently in the "poolalloc" module according to the documentation on alias analysis in LLVM. I have downloaded and built LLVM 2.6 on MinGW but the sources do not seem to include anything related to pool allocation. I don't think MinGW includes svn. Is there an download location where I can get the

On Mar 6, 2010, at 7:26 AM, Patrick Sathyanathan wrote: > Hi, > > I'm interested in using the "Data Structure Analysis" that is apparently in the "poolalloc" module according to the documentation on alias analysis in LLVM. I have downloaded and built LLVM 2.6 on MinGW but the sources do not seem to include anything related to pool allocation. I don't think

Bob Wilson wrote: > On Mar 6, 2010, at 7:26 AM, Patrick Sathyanathan wrote: > > >> Hi, >> >> I'm interested in using the "Data Structure Analysis" that is apparently in the "poolalloc" module according to the documentation on alias analysis in LLVM. I have downloaded and built LLVM 2.6 on MinGW but the sources do not seem to include anything

Hi John, I knew I would hear from you. :) On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:38 PM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> wrote: > On 10/11/11 3:24 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I would like to deprecate the LLVM project's "official" support of >> setting up the Makefiles / autoconf configurations in such a way that >> external

Hi James, I've started working with the prototype layout in context of Google's internal infrastructure. With deep apologies, I have a (very late, I know) pair of requests that have only recently solidified for me. 1. Could you add annotated tags after the cut point of each release? (I think this would probably be easy.) 2. Could you mark branch/tag operations somehow other than a

2010/9/15 <llvmdev-request at cs.uiuc.edu> > Send LLVMdev mailing list submissions to > llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > llvmdev-request at cs.uiuc.edu > > You can

Thanks Bob and John for the response. I am having problems building poolalloc with my MinGW and gcc 4.4.0 setup. Running make in the poolalloc directory results in a bunch of "undefined reference to ..." link errors building Release/lib/LLVMDataStructure.dll. I looked at the command line for this link and found that there are no libraries included with "-l..." options even

Hi, I am trying to evaluate how complex would be to modify KLEE ( http://klee.llvm.org/ ) so that it can run LLVM bitcode compiled from Java code obtained with vmjc (from the VMKIT project). Your feedback will be very appreciated. I am familiar with KLEE but I would like to know more about VMKIT, so please point me to the right docs/source code if appropriate. After a quick look over

On 10/11/11 3:24 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to deprecate the LLVM project's "official" support of > setting up the Makefiles / autoconf configurations in such a way that > external projects are encouraged to leverage them in their own build. > > I am mostly referring to the things documented in docs/Projects.html > and projects/sample.

I see that kvm has been updated since Sept. 08 2007, and qemu hasn't since Sept. 12 2007. I understand that redhat is migrating from xen to kvm, I'm curious if that has provoked this reduced maintenance or if interest was just lost. If this is of interest to others, Qemu 0.9.1 does provide a lot more features lacking in 0.9.0 that I would like to use, including virtio and e1000 NIC

On Oct 11, 2011, at 3:02 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > If the community thinks this is an important problem for LLVM to > address, then I think the ideal solution is that we provide a set of > autoconf/makefile/whatever foo that uses llvm-config and so on, but > doesn't try and do things like include the LLVM Makefiles or the LLVM > autoconf files. This would also provide a

This is a proposal to create memory safety instrumentation and optimization passes for LLVM. Abstract: The goal of this project is to modify SAFECode and AddressSanitizer (ASAN) to use a common set of memory safety instrumentation and optimization passes to increase code reuse. These tools and other similar ones use varying methods to detect whether memory accesses are safe, but are fundamentally

LLVMers, 2.6 pre-release1 is ready to be tested by the community. http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ You will notice that we have quite a few pre-compiled binaries (of both clang and llvm-gcc). We have identified several bugs that will be fixed in pre-release2, so please search the bug database before filing a new bug. If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the