similar to: [LLVMdev] Intrinsic prototype has incorrect number of arguments!

On Sep 7, 2010, at 8:03 AM, F van der Meeren wrote: > Hello, > > I have a question, what is wrong with the following code? > > declare void @llvm.memcpy.p0i64.p0i64.i8(i64*, i64*, i8, i32, i1) nounwind > > ... > > call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i64.p0i64.i8(i64* %19, i64* %21, i8 %17, i32 0, i1 false) > > ... > > > According to the compiler this is the

I have created the function prototype with the following code: const uintmax_t methodNameSize = 1024; const char methodNameTemplate[] = "llvm.memcpy.p0i%llu.p0i%llu.i%llu"; char methodName[methodNameSize]; // Create the methodName. memset(methodName, 0, methodNameSize); sprintf(methodName, methodNameTemplate, dstSize, srcSize, lengthSize); // Search for the

On Sep 7, 2010, at 8:03 AM, F van der Meeren wrote: > Hello, > > I have a question, what is wrong with the following code? > > declare void @llvm.memcpy.p0i64.p0i64.i8(i64*, i64*, i8, i32, i1) nounwind > > ... > > call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i64.p0i64.i8(i64* %19, i64* %21, i8 %17, i32 0, i1 false) > > ... > > > According to the compiler this is the

declare i8 @llvm.atomic.load.max.i8.p0i8( i8* <ptr>, i8 <delta> ) declare i16 @llvm.atomic.load.max.i16.p0i16( i16* <ptr>, i16 <delta> ) declare i32 @llvm.atomic.load.max.i32.p0i32( i32* <ptr>, i32 <delta> ) declare i64 @llvm.atomic.load.max.i64.p0i64( i64* <ptr>, i64 <delta> ) declare i8 @llvm.atomic.load.min.i8.p0i8( i8* <ptr>, i8

In working on an LLVM backend for SBCL (a lisp compiler), there are certain sequences of code that must be atomic with regards to async signals. So, for example, on x86, a single SUB on a memory location should be used, not a load/sub/store sequence. LLVM's IR doesn't currently have any way to express this kind of constraint (...and really, that's essentially impossible since

On Jan 3, 2010, at 10:10 PM, James Y Knight wrote: > In working on an LLVM backend for SBCL (a lisp compiler), there are > certain sequences of code that must be atomic with regards to async > signals. So, for example, on x86, a single SUB on a memory location > should be used, not a load/sub/store sequence. LLVM's IR doesn't > currently have any way to express this

Its seems an bug in langref, is there anyone have an look or give an explain? 2010/5/5, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) <luoyonggang at gmail.com>: > declare i8 @llvm.atomic.load.max.i8.p0i8( i8* <ptr>, i8 <delta> ) > declare i16 @llvm.atomic.load.max.i16.p0i16( i16* <ptr>, i16 <delta> ) > declare i32 @llvm.atomic.load.max.i32.p0i32( i32* <ptr>, i32

I am going to post my first chapter, just to see if it is acceptable. Any feedback is good feedback for me. Filip On 31 Aug 2010, at 17:25, Rajika Kumarasiri wrote: > Most of the documents (html) are generated using rst2html. So I think a patch to the rst file in llvm/tools/llvmc/doc should be fine. > > Rajika > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 7:59 PM, F van der Meeren

Hello i have some trouble getting my webservice to run . I have the following webservice : class DirectSpoolAPI < ActionWebService::API::Base api_method :add, :expects => [{:html=>:string},{:from=>:string}], :returns => [Customer] end class DirectSpoolService < ActionWebService::Base web_service_api DirectSpoolAPI def add(html,from) Customer.find(:first) end

I am still having some trouble finding my way in the C++ files. Could you give me a clearer direction? Filip On 13 Sep 2010, at 18:39, Charles Davis wrote: > On 9/13/10 10:32 AM, F van der Meeren wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am trying to emit C code from the module I just created. And this from LLVM-C. >> If someone could give me a pointer on how to do this in llvm (with

Hi all, I have a question concerning ActionWebService XMLRPC servers: Is it possible to send multicall requests to the Web service? I tried to use multicall and get the error message: no such method ''system.multicall'' on API [MyAPI] In Changeset 2021 there is the following commit message: add ''system.multicall'' support to XML-RPC. boxcarred methods must

On Sep 13, 2010, at 10:40 AM, F van der Meeren wrote: > I am still having some trouble finding my way in the C++ files. > Could you give me a clearer direction? If you have llvm IR then you can use 'llc' to generate c code. Try $ llc <input_llvm_ir> -march=c -o /tmp/output.c This C backend is implemented in llvm/lib/Target/CBackend - Devang

I don't see why not. C is a worthy language, one that I think we should fully support. And by just providing some minor features really limits its usefulness. Right now, at this very instance it isn't usable. Except as a stepping stone to the bigger framework. But thats just my 2 cents. - Filip On 16 Sep 2010, at 19:51, Eric Christopher wrote: > > On Sep 16, 2010, at 5:35 AM, F

I'm in the process of converting some S3 methods to S4 methods. I have this function : setGeneric("enrichmentCalc", function(rs, organism, seqLen, ...){standardGeneric("enrichmentCalc")}) setMethod("enrichmentCalc", c("GenomeDataList", "BSgenome"), function(rs, organism, seqLen, ...) { ... ... ... })

Hi, I am trying to get started with the llvm-c headers. Is there any place where I can get/retrieve documentation about it? Such as a basic tutorial, memory managment... Thank you, Filip

Attached patch fixes a problem in marshaling large integers. It seems to only occur on systems with very large memory. However, on those systems, it''s a show-stopper. I see this as a temporary solution until we can sanitize the XML-RPC functions and get rid of all the S-Expression stuff. I''ll run xm-test tomorrow against it. Right now I''ve only done basic

Hello, I have a question concerning llvm-c. I have set up a function that needs to invoke an external method, in a other library. It has the following signature: void* NSFullUserName(void); The void* can be replaced with a i8*, that far I was able to get, but when my call is invoked, the engine gives me the following message: LLVM ERROR: Tried to execute an unknown external function: i8* ()*

I think it'd be nice to have a ToC describing what you plan to cover in the "hello world" tutorial. I'll take a look at the tutorial in the week end and send feed back. Rajika On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:02 AM, F van der Meeren <llvm-dev at code2develop.com>wrote: > I am going to post my first chapter, just to see if it is acceptable. > Any feedback is good feedback

On Aug 12, 2010, at 10:43 AM, F van der Meeren wrote: > Where am I going wrong here? > Did you link against the library that contains the function? -eric

That won't work when you are trying to limit yourself to C and only C. Is there an LLVM-C alternative? Filip On 07 Sep 2010, at 20:37, Eric Christopher wrote: > > On Sep 7, 2010, at 11:30 AM, F van der Meeren wrote: > >> >> >> Any ideas on what I am doing wrong here ? >> > > > Why not just use something like: > > const Type