similar to: [LLVMdev] MS VS2008 build fails - X86AsmParser

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] MS VS2008 build fails - X86AsmParser"

2010 Sep 07
0
[LLVMdev] MS VS2008 build fails - X86AsmParser
On Sep 6, 2010, at 10:50 PM, David Shipman wrote: > Hi all, > > Just tried to build from svn sources with Visual Studio 2008, mostly > OK but fails > building the X86AsmParser lib - > > I see a few commits from yesterday that may have something to do with it, but no > idea what the solution is. Wow, that's a pretty terrible diagnostic. Does r113198 help? -Chris
2011 Mar 09
0
[LLVMdev] Unable to build latest with Visual Studio 2008
Hello, I've been building Clang under Windows 7 and Visual Studio 2008 for a while now, but had not touched it in a few months. Last night I wiped my build tree to do a full rebuild with the latest version, and got the identical error as David Shipman was seeing last September. Are others able to build under VS9 right now? Thanks, John > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] MS VS2008 build fails -
2005 Mar 10
2
[LLVMdev] Errors building llvm with Visual Studio in Debug mode
I'm not sure what causes this. Everything builds fine in Release mode but when I try to do a Debug build I get an error in Transforms (which causes all dependant projects to fail as well). I'm not exactly sure what causes the error, I'll try to investigate tomorrow (unless someone can figure out what it is by then). Below is the output from VS: ------ Build started: Project:
2005 Mar 10
0
[LLVMdev] Errors building llvm with Visual Studio in Debug mode
It compiles successfully with VC++ 7.1. You are apparently using VC++ 8.0, otherwise known as the Whidbey beta. The cause is no doubt due to bugs in Whidbey and this isn't the first one encountered. I'm sorry, but I cannot support beta Microsoft products (if only because I refuse to have them anywhere near my computer). All I can suggest is that you do a 'clean solution'
2012 May 22
2
[LLVMdev] Match operands
I'm trying to implement the standalone assembler for mips and I have encountered a problem in instruction operands matcher. In mips instruction set there are math instructions with two format flags in the mnemonic, one for source and one for destination register. For example ceil.w.s means both source and destination are F32 registers while ceil.l.d means both source and destination are F64
2012 May 22
0
[LLVMdev] Match operands
On May 22, 2012, at 8:05 AM, "Medic, Vladimir" <vmedic at mips.com> wrote: > I'm trying to implement the standalone assembler for mips and I have encountered a problem in instruction operands matcher. > In mips instruction set there are math instructions with two format flags in the mnemonic, one for source and one for destination register. > For example ceil.w.s
2013 Jul 04
4
[LLVMdev] llvm (hence Clang) not compiling with Visual Studio 2008
Hello, I have just updated my svn copy of the llvm/clang repositories after quite a long time of inactivity, and found it not compiling on Windows with Visual Studio 2008. The incriminated file is: llvm/lib/MC/MCModule.cpp Where several calls to "std::lower_bound" are made, like: atom_iterator I = std::lower_bound(atom_begin(), atom_end(),
2007 Jul 27
2
[LLVMdev] Couple of changes (2005 and other toolchain related)
Hi, I upgraded the Visual Studio SLN file to work with 2005 and had to make some changes. The first two have to do with the fact that the debug implementation of 2005's STL does all sort of validation, that's why they didn’t show up on 2003. I'm not set up for patch submission yet, but if somebody has time to review these changes that'd be greatly appreciated. Meanwhile
2007 Nov 12
1
[LLVMdev] MSVC 8 Build
Hi, I had to add an include statement for the math header to LiveIntervalAnalysis.h to get it to compile today e.g #ifndef LLVM_CODEGEN_LIVEINTERVAL_ANALYSIS_H #define LLVM_CODEGEN_LIVEINTERVAL_ANALYSIS_H #include <math.h> It seems then to work without failures; odd. However, the deprecation warnings are not suppressed for std::_Uninit_Copy and std::_Copy_Opt (warning 4996) in xutility
2012 Aug 09
1
[LLVMdev] Type inconsistency in LLVM 3.1: CGDebugInfo.cpp
Hi Ben, Thanks that helped a lot. The problem seems to be that with the move to C++11 we now have: void std::vector<_Ty>::push_back(std::pair<_Ty1,_Ty2> &&)' and there no conversion operator that can be applied to convert: 'std::pair<_Ty1,_Ty2>' to 'std::pair<_Ty3,_Ty4> && Where: [ _Ty1=void *,
2012 Aug 09
0
[LLVMdev] Type inconsistency in LLVM 3.1: CGDebugInfo.cpp
On 09.08.2012, at 19:43, "Gaster, Benedict" <Benedict.Gaster at amd.com> wrote: > I’m probably missing something simple here but in: > > CGDebugInfo.h: > > std::vector<std::pair<void *, llvm::WeakVH> >ReplaceMap; > > but then in > > CGDebugInfo.cpp: > > llvm::DIType TC = getTypeOrNull(Ty); > > void * v =
2012 Aug 09
3
[LLVMdev] Type inconsistency in LLVM 3.1: CGDebugInfo.cpp
I'm probably missing something simple here but in: CGDebugInfo.h: std::vector<std::pair<void *, llvm::WeakVH> >ReplaceMap; but then in CGDebugInfo.cpp: llvm::DIType TC = getTypeOrNull(Ty); void * v = Ty.getAsOpaquePtr(); std::pair<void *, llvm::WeakVH> tmp = std::make_pair(v, TC); if (TC.Verify() && TC.isForwardDecl())
2015 Mar 09
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.6: problems building on Windows using MSVC 2013
Hi, I have been using LLVM+Clang in my project for some time and it has been working just fine up to now (I am currently using version 3.5.1). However, with version 3.6 having just been released, I thought I would give it a try and update my code to use MCJIT rather than the now discontinued JIT. Well, this proved to be a relatively smooth process, and everything is now working fine on
2015 Mar 09
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.6: problems building on Windows using MSVC 2013
Sorry, I am using CMake+JOM or CMake+Ninja, if Ninja is available on the developer’s machine. Either way, it fails in both cases with a message similar to the one I included below (which was obtained using CMake+Ninja). Just in case, my (current) CMakeLists.txt file can be found at here
2017 Apr 10
2
clang build failures using Visual Studio
Anyone run into this before? I'm trying to get a Windows native build using Visual Studio of LLVM, Clang, and LLD 4.0.0. So far LLVM built successfully, but I'm getting these cryptic error messages when building Clang: Microsoft (R) Build Engine version 15.1.1012.6693 Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. ClangDiagnosticsEmitter.cpp c:\program files
2013 Jul 04
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] llvm (hence Clang) not compiling with Visual Studio 2008
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Benoit Perrot <benoit.noe.perrot at gmail.com>wrote: > Hello, > Hi Benoit, > I have just updated my svn copy of the llvm/clang repositories after quite > a long time of inactivity, and found it not compiling on Windows with > Visual Studio 2008. > > The incriminated file is: > > llvm/lib/MC/MCModule.cpp > > Where several
2005 Aug 02
1
Latest tarball
The latest tarball won''t compile on Windows: src/Functions.cpp(582) : error C2664: ''wxLogWarning'' : cannot convert parameter 1 from ''const class wxWCharBuffer'' to ''const char *'' No user-defined-conversion operator available that can perform this conversion, or the operator cannot be called src/Functions.cpp(592) : error
2008 Dec 05
2
[LLVMdev] Build errors on trunk for about a week now.
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 6:38 AM, Cédric Venet <cedric.venet at laposte.net> wrote: > should be fixed with r60590 (work for me) That seems to have fixed a large amount of those errors (nicely simple fix). I went ahead and termserved into my dev box (I will not be able to get to it for another day or so) and told svn to update, and cmake to make into a new directory, and build it, but it
2007 Nov 12
0
[LLVMdev] MSVC 8 Build
George, > I have been experimenting with getting LLVM to build with > MSVC8 express. > > I have succeeded in getting trunk to build and run the > Fibonacci example in release mode. I have found various minor > problems with the build system. First, it appears not to be > able to run the configure subproject commands if there is a > space in the directory path.
2007 Jul 27
0
[LLVMdev] Couple of changes (2005 and other toolchain related)
Hola Jaap, I'm curious which version of the source are you working with? It sounds like you and I were working on the same problem yesterday, but I didn't see those particular compiler errors. (I saw a couple of other ones for which I submitted a patch). I did see errors like the ones you saw with the CVS LLVM 2.0 sources a while back, namely the missing < operator and the debug STL