similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm-link and ld option --whole-archive

Hi list, For a tool I'm working on I'd like to know where instructions end up in compiled executables by looking them up in the symbol table. Therefore, I've been trying to use the llvm.pcmarker Intrinsic, but I've had no luck. When I pass .bc files with this intrinsic into llc, I'm given this error: LLVM ERROR: Cannot yet select: 0x2026938: ch PCMarker 0x1f0c678, 0x20268b0

Hi, I'd like to disable all inlining in llvm-gcc/llvm-g++. From the FAQ on llvm.org, I see: "Passing "-Wa,-disable-opt -Wl,-disable-opt" will disable *all* cleanup and optimizations done at the llvm level, leaving you with the truly horrible code that you desire." But from a cursory glance at llvm-backend.cpp I don't immediately see that everything has been disabled

Hi Everyone, I am building a script for a client and my imagecreatefromjpeg() is throwing a fatal exception, and dying. It seems as my server with CentOS 4, PHP 4.3.9 doesn't have >= GD-1.8 support or better. I did a phpinfo() and I can not find any reference to GD..............Any help on this would be well appricated -- Best Regards, Jon McCauley

Hey everyone! Got a little problem...with CentOS / BQ / PHP 4.3.9 with the mail() function I'm able to send mail using postfix directly from the command line, however when I try using the mail function of php no mail is being sent. This simple script works on all my older Cobalt Boxs. <? if($action=="send") { $to = 'me at domain.dot'; $subject = 'the

Hello list, I'm wondering about the feasibility of collapsing the following two globals within llvm-link: @"OBJC_CLASSLIST_REFERENCES_$_2" = private global %struct.objc_class* bitcast (%struct._class_t* @"OBJC_CLASS_$_NSString" to %struct.objc_class*), section "__DATA, __objc_classrefs, regular, no_dead_strip", align 4 @"OBJC_CLASSLIST_REFERENCES_$_8"

On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Nathan McCauley <nathan.mccauley at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi list, > > For a tool I'm working on I'd like to know where instructions end up in > compiled executables by looking them up in the symbol table.  Therefore, > I've been trying to use the  llvm.pcmarker Intrinsic, but I've had no luck. > When I pass .bc files with this

I haven't test it completely for Apache , when I finish that I will post it ASAP. BTW, Have you archieved the same goal with gold-plugin???I once tried it but just got a failure for llvm tools is not completely compatible with GNU ones. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Keppler, Dave" <dkeppler at mitre.org> To: "Nan Zhu" <zhunansjtu at gmail.com>;

Hi list, I'm wondering if LLC supports code generation targeting ARM processors and using the EABI. Thanks, Nathan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100505/3f16d04f/attachment.html>

> BTW, Have you archieved the same goal with gold-plugin???I once tried it but just got a failure for llvm tools is not completely compatible with GNU ones. Do you remember what was the failure? Cheers, -- Rafael Ávila de Espíndola

I'm not completely sure but something like the build system will still call the native linker when it meets a LLVM object file which causes an error. I once tried to modify the codes of gold-plugin, but the trouble is still there,I think we should hack collect2 of llvm-gcc to make it invoke llvm-ld automatically when it receive the -emit-llvm option(I once tried this, but I found that even

Hi Rafael, I've tried the LTO options with dragonegg, but I haven't had any luck getting it to work, I'm not sure if it is related to my installation of gold or my gcc configuration. I'm really interested in getting the resulting program as bitcode though. Will LTO do that for me? What I'm trying to do is build a bitcode version of libc that I can combine with a program and

Hello llvm'ers, We are using the llvm compiler tools (llvm-link, llc, etc) to generate code for ARM for the Android NDK. We're on a pretty tight deadline and have a host of issues that we could use some help overcoming. We're interested in bringing on a contractor experienced in llvm to help us. Broadly, llc is giving various assertion failures while generating the native code

Hi, I don't think just use gold-plugin even modified is enough for the task of building a whole-program bc file. When we want to build a whole-program bc file by a general solution(I meant that we can use such a method for all kinds of build system),we need not only a gold-plugin to do what llvm-ld does,but also some mechanisms,not a simple trick to modify the env variables,to run

zhunan wrote: > Hi, > > I don't think just use gold-plugin even modified is enough for the task > of building a whole-program bc file. > > When we want to build a whole-program bc file by a general solution(I > meant that we can use such a method for all kinds of build system),we > need not only a gold-plugin to do what llvm-ld does,but also some > mechanisms,not a

Hi, I found some posts on the topic of whole program bitcode and gold plugin. I put lto_codegen_write_merged_modules(cg, "/path/to/output.bc") into gold-plugin.cpp all_symbols_read_hook() and compiled one autotooled program (ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/diction/diction-1.11.tar.gz) as described in the gold plugin document, however, I still did not see the output.bc. Can anyone has

Thank you for the reply,but I meant that when we building,we can not use the native tools such ar and as to process the llvm files,we must have the ability to call llvm-ar and llvm-as instead of the native ones. 在 2009-10-17六的 19:35 -0700，Nick Lewycky写道： > zhunan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I don't think just use gold-plugin even modified is enough for the task > > of

Hi Gregory, > I've tried the LTO options with dragonegg, but I haven't had any luck getting it > to work, details? Ciao, Duncan. I'm not sure if it is related to my installation of gold or my gcc > configuration. > > I'm really interested in getting the resulting program as bitcode though. Will > LTO do that for me? What I'm trying to do is build a

On 11-06-28 10:45 PM, Gregory Malecha wrote: > Hello, > > I've been trying to build some normal linux applications with clang and I keep running into a snag in configure scripts. Perhaps these scripts are not written very well, but the current clang behavior seems strange. When I run clang with the -emit-llvm option, it still uses /usr/bin/ld as the linker which fails to compile llvm

Yes,but when I just simply replace lto_codegen_compile(cg, ...) with lto_codegen_write_merged_modules(cg, "/path/to/output.bc") in the gold-plugin.cpp to see if it will generate a correct bc file,the llvm-gcc/llvm-g++ will call the native ld in the linking step,which causes the failture because of that ld can not recognize an object file which contains LLVM's IL. I understand the

Hello, I've been trying to build some normal linux applications with clang and I keep running into a snag in configure scripts. Perhaps these scripts are not written very well, but the current clang behavior seems strange. When I run clang with the -emit-llvm option, it still uses /usr/bin/ld as the linker which fails to compile llvm bitcode on linux (though it works on mac). Here's a