similar to: [LLVMdev] OCaml bindings patch

Hi there, I have some questions about authenticating linux users against Active Directory 2003 using winbind. My server is a member of an AD 2003 domain. It is running Samba Version 3.0.23c-2.el5.2.0.2 on a RHEL5. First of all, authentication is working. But I have some smaller issues : * wbinfo -u is very, very slow when dumping AD users. About 30 seconds. Whereas wbinfo -g is instantaneous.

Hi, I would like to add a color under a lm line and not the plotted line. Is this possible? In the example, I do not want the area under the curve red, but rather under the llm line. x=seq(0,5,len=100) y=-(x-5)^2 llm<-lm(y~x) plot(x,y) polygon(c(x,x[length(x)]), c(y, y[1]), col='red') abline(llm) keith -- M. Keith Cox, Ph.D. Alaska NOAA Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service

Hello, I just installed Samba4 using the following doc : http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_HOWTO Everything works Ok. All tests are Ok. Now, I would like to manage it from a remote Windows7 Virtualbox workstation. For that, I followed the following doc : http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_management_from_windows I installed the RSAT component but when trying to connect the

Hello, Being new to this list and to Nut, maybe my question has been asked before but I didn't find a clear answer. My question is : is it possible to make nut aware of the percentage (or duration) of time before the UPS exhausts its power ? Thus making Nut conditionning the shutdown of the servers depending on the remaining load. I saw this thread on the mailing list :

Hi, Is it possible to handle quota management on a samba4 share ? To be more precise, is it possible to have the same quota management as in Windows File Servers. Thanks. -- Emmanuel Lesouef CRBN/DSI/SITI e: e.lesouef at crbn.fr gpg keyid : FCAB0C55 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 490 bytes

Hey everyone, I'm currently trying to figure out a method for providing a unique identification of an llvm::Instruction that is consistent with the output of an AssemblyWriter. Obviously this is easy for named instructions: In this case the identification is the name itself, but I'd like to have the same thing for unnamed instructions. If I understand the code in AssemblyWriter.cpp

Hi Juan: I haven't looked at SlotTracker, but have been using MemoryDependenceWrapperPass to do something similar. hth... don On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 5:55 AM, Juan Ceasar via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Good Morning - Happy Holidays everyone! > > I had a question about the best way to do back tracing of variables via > the IR. So for example, if I

Hamid 2C wrote: > Hi all, > > I am working on some old code which was compiled against llvm-2.5. > Anyway, in some places I, AllocationInst is used (e.g. to ensure the > instruction's type). Even in your current documentation > (http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html), I found an example that > uses this instruction. > If I got it correctly, this istruction

Michael Smith wrote: > Well, line 364 wasn't actually what was holding me up, so it's a bad > example, but the problem's still relevant. Using cast<...>(iter), > dyn_cast<...>(iter), or isa<...>(iter) results in the error messages > mentioned below. .... > When compiling LoadValueNumbering.cpp, I get the following errors: > >

On 12/15/10 2:37 AM, Nick Lewycky wrote: > Hamid 2C wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I am working on some old code which was compiled against llvm-2.5. >> Anyway, in some places I, AllocationInst is used (e.g. to ensure the >> instruction's type). Even in your current documentation >> (http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html), I found an example that >>

On Oct 13, 2010, at 5:09 PM, Kenneth Uildriks wrote: > But I believe the language does allow "undefined behavior" if there's > a use of pT when the pointed-to object isn't actually of type T. It's > an invalid use in that case, right? Yes, but not for an arbitrary pointer which aliases pT. That's why it's a problem that llm.invariant is specified in terms

On Friday 13 November 2009 15:17, you wrote: > > Are these known to be broken right now? I get failure when using either. > > > > $ llc -march=arm -print-machineinstrs hw.bc > > Seems due to David's patches. Ok, it's faulting in SlotTracker with what looks like a bad Function. One of the Argument values is corrupted. I'm not abdicating responsibility, but at

Good Morning - Happy Holidays everyone! I had a question about the best way to do back tracing of variables via the IR. So for example, if I have the following simple IR: define i32 @squak(i32 %num) #0 { %1 = alloca i32, align 4 store i32 %num, i32* %1, align 4 %2 = load i32, i32* %1, align 4 %3 = icmp sgt i32 %2, 10 I’m grabbing the predicate of “icmp”, which in this case is a simple

I had a long discussion with Nick about this where he changed several of my core assumptions and feelings about the best way to proceed here. I'd rather he provide his perspective rather me try to repeat it, so poking him on this thread.... On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith < dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: > > > On 2014 Jul 8, at 18:47, Duncan P. N.

Hi all, I am working on some old code which was compiled against llvm-2.5. Anyway, in some places I, AllocationInst is used (e.g. to ensure the instruction's type). Even in your current documentation (http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html), I found an example that uses this instruction. If I got it correctly, this istruction (AllocationInst) has been removed from llvm instruction set.

On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 09:52:12PM -0700, Gregory Szorc wrote: > The automatic generation of the Python ctypes interfaces using the Clang > Python bindings is pretty friggin cool! A nice side effect is that everything is added to the interface. So it is easy to add a small proxy over the lib that shows which parts of the llvm-c API that is exercised by the tests. (have that in my bindings)

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 7:26 PM, John McCall <rjmccall at apple.com> wrote: > On Oct 13, 2010, at 5:09 PM, Kenneth Uildriks wrote: >> But I believe the language does allow "undefined behavior" if there's >> a use of pT when the pointed-to object isn't actually of type T.  It's >> an invalid use in that case, right? > > Yes, but not for an

On Nov 13, 2009, at 1:49 PM, David Greene wrote: > On Friday 13 November 2009 15:17, you wrote: >>> Are these known to be broken right now? I get failure when using either. >>> >>> $ llc -march=arm -print-machineinstrs hw.bc >> >> Seems due to David's patches. > > Ok, it's faulting in SlotTracker with what looks like a bad Function. One

I'm trying to sync from 3.0.5 to 2.5.5 (SCO, *sigh*) The source machine errors out b/c the --remove-source-files (or --remove-sent-files) options don't exist on 2.5.5. But, since these option are only acted on by the sending machine (which is where I'm typing the command line), it would be so nice if the source machine would NOT pass the option on to the receiver (or at least, not

Are these known to be broken right now? I get failure when using either. $ llc -march=arm -print-machineinstrs hw.bc ... BB#0: derived from LLVM BB %entry Live Ins: %LR %R7 %SP<def> = SUBri %SP<kill>, 8, 14, %reg0, %reg0 STR %LR<kill>, %SP, %reg0, 4, 14, %reg0; mem:ST4[0 llc 0x008b3304 PrintStackTrace(void*) + 45 1 llc 0x008b390c